This article analyzes the growing relevance of scientific evidence in Brazilian civil procedure, with emphasis on the role of the judge as the ultimate recipient of the evidence and the pursuit of the factual truth. The work addresses the technical complexity surrounding this type of evidence, such as expert reports, highlighting the judge’s responsibility to properly interpret the data presented, always in observance of the principle of human dignity. The interaction between judges and experts, the principle of free evaluation of evidence, and the new challenges posed by the use of artificial intelligence and digital evidence in the judicial sphere are also discussed. It concludes that, although scientific evidence stands out as a fundamental tool for building a fair and well-reasoned decision, its application demands rigor in evaluation and necessary precautions to avoid injustices and ensure the protection of the fundamental rights of the parties involved.
KeywordsEvidenceCode of Civil ProcedureScientific EvidenceExpert ReportsArtificial IntelligenceHuman Dignity
Arenhart, S. C. (2005). Truth and Proof in Civil Procedure. Brazilian Academy of Civil Procedural Law-ABDPC.
Aroca, J. M. (2011). Evidence in Civil Procedure (6th ed.). Civitas.
Barbosa Moreira, J. C. (1984). The Judge and the Evidence, RePro 35/178-184.
Bedaque, J. R. D. S. (2001). Instructional Powers of the Judge (3rd ed.). Revista dos Tribunais.
Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure (2015). Law N. 13.105, of March 16, 2015. Presidency of the Republic. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm
Brusco, C. (2008). The Evaluation of Scientific Evidence. http://www.antoniocasella.eu/dnlaw/Brusco_2008.pdf
Cambi, E. (2016). Chapter XII. Evidence. In Cunha, José Sebastião Fagundes.
Carnelutti, F. (1947). La prova civile (2nd ed.). Ateneo.
Carvalho, D. (2020). 3 Criteria for Valuing Scientific Evidence of Environmental Damage and Risks: Between Scientific Credibility and Legal Validity. In Public Civil Action . Editora Revista dos Tribunais. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/doutrina/acao-civil-publica/1188257268
Cintra, A. C. D. A. (2003). Comentários ao Código de Processo Civil (2nd ed., p. 237). Editora Forense.
Da Silva, F. Q. (2018). The Judge and the Analysis of Expert Evidence. Legal Journal of the Attorney General ’ s Office of the State of Paraná, Curitiba, 9, 11-30. https://www.pge.pr.gov.br/sites/default/arquivos_restritos/files/documento/2019-10/002ojuizeaanalisedaprovapericial.pdf
Dantas, M. (2022). 2. The Free Conviction of the Judge in the Evaluation of Evidence in the Process. In M. Dantas (Ed.), Current Issues in Procedural Law: Studies in Honor of Professor Eduardo Arruda Alvim . Editora Revista dos Tribunais. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/doutrina/temas-atuais-de-direito-processual-estudos-em-homenagem-ao-professor-eduardo-arruda-alvim/1481216024
Dinamarco, C. R. (2005). Institutions of Civil Procedural Law (5th ed.). Malheiros.
Ferreira, W. S. (2014). Fundamental Principles of Civil Evidence. Revista dos Tribunais,.
Granito, F., & Barbosa, T. (2024). Truth in the Aristotelian View and the Purpose of Evidence as a Search for “Truth” in Civil Procedure. Revista Jurídica Brasileira , 2 .
Lopes, J. B. (1999). Evidence in Civil Procedural Law. Revista dos Tribunais.
Lopes, J. B. (2017). Comentários ao Código de Processo Civil—Volume 2 (arts. 318 to 538). Saraiva.
Lopes, J. B. (2022). Prova científica: Conceito e valoração. Revista de Processo, 327 , 165-173.
Marinoni, L., & Arenhart, S. (2022). Relations between Truth and Proof. In L. Marinoni, & S. Arenhart (Eds.), Proof and Conviction (page). Editora Revista dos Tribunais. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/doutrina/prova-e-conviccao-ed-2022/1765408472
Marques, J. F. (1967). Institutions of Civil Procedural Law (2nd ed.). Forense.
Mendes, J. D. C. (1961). Do conceito de prova em processo civil. Edições Ática.
Nery Junior, N. (2004). Principles of Civil Procedure in the Federal Constitution (8th ed.). Revista dos Tribunais.
Nery Junior, N., & Nery, R. M. D. A. (2016). Commentary on the Code of Civil Procedure (16th ed.). Revista dos Tribunais.
Neto, J. (2018). 6.28 Principle of Real Truth; Process and Formal Truth; the Prohibition of Unlawful Evidence In J. C. Neto (Ed.), Fundamentos principiológicos do Processo Civil . Editora Revista dos Tribunais. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/doutrina/fundamentos-principiologicos-do-processo-civil/1280763105
Pizzol, P. M. (2019). Collective Protection: Collective Proceedings and Techniques for Standardizing Decisions. Revista dos Tribunais. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/doutrina/tutela-coletiva-processo-coletivo-e-tecnicas-de-padronizacao-das-decisoes/1300338209
Portugal (2021). Portuguese Charter on Human Rights in the Digital Age. Law No. 27/2021. Electronic Official Gazette. https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/lei/27-2021-163442504
Rabenhorst, E. R. (2001). Human Dignity and Democratic Morality. Brasília Jurídica.
Santos, M. A. (1983). Prova judiciária no cível e comercial (5th ed.). Saraiva. https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/materias/2024/08/23/para-brasileiros-noticias-falsas-impactam-eleicoes-revela-datasenado
Santos, M. A. (2004). First Lines of Civil Procedural Law (pp. 337-338). Editora Saraiva.
Soneghetti, V. (2012). The Use of Science in the Process: Scientific Evidence in Brazilian Civil Procedural Law. Master’s Thesis, Federal University of Espírito Santo.
Taruffo, M. (2014). Il Concetto Di “ Prova ” Nel Diritto Processuale . Revista de Processo.
Tepedino, G., & Viégas, F. D. A. (2017). Pensar, Revista de Ciências Jurídicas. Fortaleza, 22, 551-566.
Tonini, P. (2000). Criminal Evidence (4th ed.). Padova.
Wambier, L. R., Almeida, F. R. C., & Talamini, E. (2006). Advanced Course in Civil Procedure: General Theory of Procedure and Process of Knowledge. Revista dos Tribunais.
Wambier, L., & Talamini, E. (2022). Chapter 18. Judicial Inspection. In L. Wambier, & E. Talamini (Eds.), Advanced Course in Civil Procedure . Editora Revista dos Tribunais. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/doutrina/curso-avancado-de-processo-civil-vol-2-ed-2022/1734145967
Wambier, T. A. A. et al. (2015). Breves comentários ao novo Código de Processo Civil. Revista dos Tribunais.