Electoral Courts and the Regulation of Social Media in Brazil: An Analysis of the Anti-Democratic Disinformation Regulation during the 2022 Elections
- 1 Graduate Program in Constitutional Law (PPGD), University of Fortaleza (Unifor), Fortaleza, Brazil
- 2 Center for Legal Sciences (CCJ), University of Fortaleza (Unifor), Fortaleza, Brazil
- 3 Ceará Foundation for Scientific and Technological Development Support (Funcap)—Research Scholarship, Fortaleza, Brazil
Abstract
This study analyzes the need for specific legislation regulating big techs’ activities concerning network transparency and accountability in Brazilian law, considering the massive dissemination of fake news and the question of its influence on democratic stability. Drawing on the operations of major technology firms and their algorithms, coupled with prevalent self-regulation and the lack of comprehensive data on fake news dissemination, this work establishes parameters based on the decisions of the Brazilian Superior Electoral Court (TSE) and Regional Electoral Courts (TREs) regarding anti-democratic fake news shared on social media during electoral processes. The research is both fundamental and applied in nature, incorporates a propositional objective, and employs bibliographic, documentary, and jurimetric methods through a mixed-methods approach that combines quantitative and qualitative techniques, employs content analysis and incorporates an instrument-validation procedure. The conclusion presents an objective synthesis of the findings, including an assessment of the tested hypotheses, in a propositional format aligned with the study’s purpose. It also reflects on the data analysis to underscore the imperative of regulating social media as a mechanism to preserve democratic order.
- Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments . Stanford University Press.
- Bauman, Z. (2005). Liquid Life. Polity Press.
- Brasil (1965). Lei n ˚ 4.737, de 15 de julho de 1965 (Código Eleitoral). Diário Oficial da União. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l4737compilado.htm
- Brasil (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil (de 5 de outubro de 1988). Promulgada pela Assembleia Nacional Constituinte . Diário Oficial da União. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm
- Brasil (2018). Lei n ˚ 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018 (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais — LGPD) . Diário Oficial da União. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/l13709.htm
- Brasil (2019). Resolução n˚ 23.610, de 18 de dezembro de 2019 (Dispõe sobre a propaganda eleitoral). Diário da Justiça Eletrônico, 249, 156-184. https://www.tse.jus.br/legislacao/compilada/res/2019/resolucao-no-23-610-de-18-de-dezembro-de-2019
- Brasil (2020). Projeto de Lei n ˚ 2630, de 2020 (Lei Brasileira de Liberdade, Responsabilidade e Transparência na Internet) . Plenário do Senado Federal. https://www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/materias/-/materia/141944
- Câmara dos Deputados (2022). Deputados rejeitam urgência a projeto de combate a fake news . https://www.camara.leg.br/noticias/864946-deputados-rejeitam-urgencia-a-projeto-de-combate-a-fake-news/
- Canclini, N. G. (2012). Culturas híbridas: Estrategias para entrar y salir de la modernidad. Paidós.
- Fisher, M. (2022). The Chaos Machine: The Inside Story of How Social Media Rewired Our Minds and Our World . Little, Brown and Company.
- Foucault, M. (2009). Nascimento da biopolítica: Curso dado no Collège de France (1978-1979) . Martins Fontes.
- Gray, J., Bounegru, L., & Venturini, T. (2020). ‘Fake News’ as Infrastructural Uncanny. New Media & Society, 22, 317-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819856912
- Hall, S. (1996). Questions of Cultural Identity. Sage Publications.
- Han, B. C. (2020). Psicopolítica: O neoliberalismo e as novas técnicas de poder (M. Liesen, Trad.). Âyiné.
- Han, B. C. (2022). Infocracia: Digitalização e a crise da democracia (G. S. Philipson, Trad.). Vozes.