Generative Artificial Intelligence Data Risks and Governance Pathways
- 1 School of International Law, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China
- 2 Law School, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China
Abstract
Generative AI, exemplified by ChatGPT, offers societal benefits while posing challenges to data governance. Addressing data risks is vital for its healthy development. This paper examines the technical framework and pre-training data system of generative AI, identifying risks such as personal information, data property, and national security. These risks amplify traditional network data concerns. To mitigate them, the study suggests categorizing risks and applying relevant legal frameworks, including China’s Personal Information Protection Law and Cybersecurity Law. Acknowledging the limitations of existing laws, it advocates for supplementary ethics rules, stricter penalties for violations, and an enhanced sanctions system to strengthen data governance in generative AI.
- Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., & Askell, A. (2020). Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877-1901.
- Bu. X. M. (2021). On the Reconsideration and System Construction of Data Localization Mode. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 44, 80-87, 79. http://doi.org/10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2021.12.011
- Cai. C. H. (2018). Geopolitics in the Cyberspace: A New Perspective on U.S.-China Relations. The Journal of International Studies, 39, 9-37.
- Chen. Y. W. (2023). Beyond ChatGPT: Opportunities, Risks, and Challenges from Generative AI. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) , No. 3, 127-143. http://doi.org/10.19836/j.cnki.37-1100/c.2023.03.012
- De Jong-Chen, J. (2015). Data Sovereignty, Cybersecurity, and Challenges for Globalization. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 16, 112.
- European Commission (2019). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
- Guo. S. (2022). Data Sovereignty Maintenance from the Cloud Storage: Taking the Long Arm Jurisdiction Regulated by the Blocking Statute as an Example. China Law Review No. 6, 72-85.
- Hendler, J., & Mulvehill, A. (2016). Social Machines: The Coming Collision of Artificial Intelligence, Social Networking, and Humanity. Apress.
- Hu, W. (2018). The Soft Law Governance in Risk Society. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 34, 33-37.
- Jin, L. J., & Zai, Y. (2023). Review of the Principle of Minimum and Necessity in Personal Information Processing. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 25, 140-150. http://doi.org/10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.0363
- Liu, H. (2021). Logic of Platform Power—The Recentralization Mechanism of Online Society. Beijing Cultural Review , No . 1, 31-39.
- Ma, Z. S. (2016). Issues of ‘Rule of Soft Law’ and Its Countermeasures in ‘Internet +’ Age. Modern Law Science , No. 5, 49-56.
- Mei, X. Y. (2019a). Between Sharing and Control: The Limitation of Private Law and the Building of Public Order in Data Proteciton. Peking University Law Journal, 31, 845-870. http://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-4875.2019.04.001
- Mei, X. Y. (2019b). The Abstraction of Civil Subject and Its Impact on the System of Private Law. Business and Economic Law Review , No. 1, 86-99.