Algorithmic Tax Power and Constitutional Safeguards: Global Perspectives on AI, Bias, and Digital Tax Justice
- 1 Tax Law, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
Abstract
The growing use of algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI) systems in tax administration poses significant challenges to constitutional principles that have historically constrained the state’s power to levy taxes. This paper analyses how the automated exercise of taxing authority—here referred to as the “artificial taxing power”—can reproduce biases, obscure decision-making processes, and undermine fundamental rights such as legality, equality, ability to pay, and due process. Based on doctrinal, constitutional, and empirical analysis, the study argues that the Brazilian Constitution, from 1946 to the present, provides a solid foundation for the creation of a Digital Taxpayer Bill of Rights. Comparative experiences (EU, US, China and Latin America) are examined, the risks of generative models (LLMs) are discussed, and a governance agenda is proposed for digital tax justice, including legal, institutional, and technical safeguards to ensure transparency, explainability, and human oversight.
- Benjamins, R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., & Gangemi, A. (2005). Law and the Semantic Web: Legal Ontologies, Methodologies, Legal Information, Retrieval, and Applications . Springer.
- Berends, S. (2021). Dutch Child Benefit Scandal: Origin and Latest Develo pments . ESPN Flash Report 2021/51, European Social Policy Network (ESPN), European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=24723&langId=en
- Faceli, K., Lorena, A. C., Gama, J., & Carvalho, A. C. P. de L. F de (2011). Inteligência Artificial: Uma abordagem de aprendizado de máquina . LTC.
- Freitas, J. (2013). Hermenêutica jurídica e ciência do cérebro: Como tratar os auto-matismos mentais. Revista da AJURI S, No. 130 , 223-244.
- Gruner, R. (1986). Thinking like a Lawyer: Expert Systems for Legal Analysis. Berkeley Technology Law Journal , 1, 261-262.
- Minsky, M. (1961). Steps toward Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the IRE, 49, 8-30. https://doi.org/10.1109/jrproc.1961.287775
- Nilsson, N. J. (2010). The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements . Cambridge University Press.
- OECD (2020). Tax Administration 3.0: The Digital Transformation of Tax Administration . OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/tax/forum-on-tax-administration/publications-and-products/tax-administration-3-0.pdf
- Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society : The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information . Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061
- Soffner, R. (2013). Algorithms and Programming in C Language (p. 21). Saraiva.
- Sunstein, C. R. (2018a). Algorithmic Bias and Human Error . SSRN Working Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3300171
- Sunstein, C. R. (2018b). Algorithms, Bias Correction . Forthcoming, Social Research. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3300171
- Susskind, R. (2008). The End of Lawyers: Rethinking the Nature of Legal Serv ices . Oxford University Press.
- Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind , 49, 433-460.
- Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017). Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation. International Data Privacy Law, 7, 76-99. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipx005