Force Majeure and Discharge of Performance in Contracts: The UK Supreme Court’s Judgment in RTI v MUR Shipping B V and the Ensuing Repercussions on Contractual Interpretation
- 1 Commercial Law Division, Osborne Law Practice (Head Office: LagosBranches: Abuja & Port Harcourt), Nigeria
Abstract
In RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV (UKSC, 2024), the Supreme Court held that a party’s obligation to use reasonable endeavors to overcome a force-majeure event does not require acceptance of non-contractual performance: mitigation must proceed strictly by the contractually stipulated mode. This formalist stance sits uneasily with the mainstream of English mitigation doctrine and with interpretive commitments to commercial common sense, business efficacy, and relevant background facts, which often privilege attainment of contractual purpose over rigid adherence to form. The article contends that the Court’s reasoning is under-theorized: it engages only lightly with the implicated authorities on contractual interpretation and leaves unaddressed the bearing of privity and separate corporate personality. The result, the article argues, is a decision insufficiently attuned to commercial practice and the expectations of reasonable businesspeople. Unless overruled, it risks chilling transactions in a sanctions-sensitive trading environment and misaligning English contract legal framework with contemporary market realities.
- Al-Tawil, T. (2013). Damages for Breach of Contract: Compensation, Cost of Cure and Vindication. Adelaide Law Review, 34, 351-377.
- Atiyah, P. S. (1979). The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract. Oxford University Press.
- Bamiatzi, V., Brieger, S. A., Karakulak, Ö., Kinderman, D., & Manning, S. (2025). The Rise of Partisan CSR: Corporate Responses to the Russia-Ukraine War. Journal of Business Ethics, 198, 263-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05795-9
- Barnett, R. E. (1986). A Consent Theory of Contract. Columbia Law Review, 86, 269-321. https://doi.org/10.2307/1122705
- Beale, H. (2021). Chitty on Contracts (34th ed., Vol. I.). Sweet & Maxwell.
- Burrows, A. (2019). Remedies for Torts and Breach of Contract (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Gerhart, P. M., & Kostritsky, J. P. (2015). Efficient Contextualism. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 76, 509-568. https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2015.362
- Goff, R. (1984). Commercial Contracts and the Commercial Court. Lloyd’s Maritime & Commercial Law Quarterly, 382-385
- Goode, R., & McKendrick, E. (2020). Goode and McKendrick on Commercial Law (6th ed.). Penguin Books.
- Havelock, R. (2016). Return to Tradition in Contractual Interpretation. King ’ s Law Journal, 27, 188-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2016.1191260
- Hoffmann, L. (1997). The Intolerable Wrestle with Words and Meanings. South African Law Journal, 114, 656-674.
- Hooley, R. (2013). Controlling Contractual Discretion. The Cambridge Law Journal, 72, 65-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197313000019
- Ingham, G. (2004). The Nature of Money. Polity.
- Kaiser, R., & Hovsepyan, E. (2024). Secondary Sanctions and Force Majeure Clauses. In T. Ruys, C. Ryngaert, & F. R. Silvestre, (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Secondary Sanctions and International Law (pp. 333-361). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009365840.019
- Kramer, A. (2003). Common Sense Principles of Contract Interpretation (and How We’ve Been Using Them All Along). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23, 173-196. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/23.2.173
- Markus, S. (2022). Long-Term Business Implications of Russia’s War in Ukraine. Asian Business & Management, 21, 483-487. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-022-00181-7