The Right to a Remedy in Türkiye: From the Ottoman Era to the Republic of Türkiye
- 1 Faculty of Law, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
Abstract
The right to an effective remedy is a foundational principle of international human rights law, ensuring that individuals whose rights have been violated can seek redress through accessible and impartial legal mechanisms. This principle is enshrined in Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights ( UDHR ) and Article 2(3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ( ICCPR ), which obligates states to provide effective remedies for violations of recognized rights. First, I will begin with the historical background of Turkish law to outline the scope of “rights” under Turkish law. Second, I will evaluate the right to a remedy within international human rights documents, especially in terms of the ICCPR and Türkiye. Third, I will examine the right to a remedy under Turkish law in relation to the European Convention on Human Rights and the cases of its court. Fourth, this study will examine the post-2010 constitutional amendment that introduced the right of individual application to the Turkish Constitutional Court, following the exhaustion of domestic remedies, and which entered into force on 23 September 2012.
- Akdivar v. Türkiye, 23 Eur. H.R. Rep. 143 (1996).
- Akgündüz, A. (1989). Fo rmer Constitutions of (Turks) and Islamic Constitu tion . Timaş Yayınları.
- Akgündüz, A., & Cin, H. (1996). Turkish Legal History (Private Law), Volume II . Osmanlı Yayınları.
- Akgündüz, A., & Öztürk, S. (1999). Un known Ottoman on the 700th Anniversa ry . Osmanlı Yayınları.
- Armağan, S. (1987). Basic Rights and Freedoms in Islamic Law . Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı Yayınları.
- Aydın v. Türkiye, 25 Eur. H.R. Rep. 251 (1997).
- Batum, S. (1993). The European Convention on Human Rights and Its Influences on the Turkish Constitutional System . İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi İ.Ü. Basımevi.
- Boyle, K., & Sheen, J. (1997). Freedom of Religion and Belief . Routledge.
- Çalı, B. (2021). Strategic Compliance and Judicial Politics: The Turkish Constitutional Court’s Human Rights Jurisprudence after 2016. Hu man Rights Law Review, 21, 255-278.
- Dışişleri Bakanlığı, T. C. (2025). Human Rights Developments in Türkiye . https://www.mfa.gov.tr/humanrights_.en.mfa
- Gemalmaz, M. S. (1994). The State of Emergency Regime Standards in International Human Rights Law and Turkish Law (2nd ed.). Beta Yayınları.
- Gözler, K. (2019). Türk Anayasa Hukuku Dersler i (13th ed.). Ekin Yayınları.
- Gözübüyük, A. Ş. (2004). Administrative Law . Yetkin Yayınları.
- İnalcık, H. (1987). D ocuments and Researches on Fatih Era (Mehmet II), Volu me I (2nd ed.). Türk Dil Kurumu (TDK).
- Jabari v. Türkiye, App. No. 40035/98, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2000).
- Kaboğlu, İ. Ö. (2012). Anayasa Yargısı ve İnsan Hakları. İmge Kitabevi.
- Karatepe, Ş. (1997). The Single Party Era . İz Yayıncılık.
- Karpat, K. H. (2004). Studies on Turkish Politics and Society : Selected Articles and Essays . Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047402718
- Kaya, N. (2019). The Impact of the 2016 Purges on the Judiciary in Türkiye . Human Rights Watch.
- Kaya, N., & Baldwin, C. (2004). Minorities in Türkiye : Submission to the European Union and the Government of Türkiye . Minority Rights Group International. https://en.rightsagenda.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/313_minorities_in_turkey.pdf