Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Private Property and Constitutional Limits on the Taxing Power: An Overview of the Prohibition on Confiscatory Taxation in the Brazilian, German, Spanish, Argentine, and Mexican Legal Orders
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- 1 Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Beijing Law Review·Volume 16 (2025)·Pages 2480–2494·Published 17 October 2025·DOI10.4236/blr.2025.164126
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
This paper examines the constitutional prohibition on confiscatory taxation in Brazilian law as a limit on state taxing power. Using doctrinal and comparative analysis, it explores the principle’s connection to property rights, the ability-to-pay principle, and minimum subsistence. The study finds that this prohibition, while explicit in Brazil’s 1988 Constitution, is a common feature across the German, Spanish, Argentine, and Mexican legal systems, where it is protected either explicitly or implicitly through fundamental rights.
KeywordsProhibition on Confiscatory TaxationAbility-to-Pay PrincipleMinimum SubsistenceBrazilian Federal ConstitutionTax Equality (Isonomy)
- Alexy, R. (1999). Colisão de direito fundamentais e realização de direitos fundamentais no Estado de Direito democrático. Revista De Direito Administrativo, 217, 67-79. https://doi.org/10.12660/rda.v217.1999.47414
- Barroso, L. R. (2024). Contemporary Constitutional Law (12th ed.). SaraivaJur.
- Becho, R. L. (2015). Lessons in Tax Law (3rd ed.). Saraiva.
- Brazil (1988). Federal Constitution of 1988 . http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm
- Cardoso, D. B. (2016). Collision of Fundamental Rights, Balancing, and Proportionality in Robert Alexy’s View. Constitution and Rights Guarantee Journal, 137-155. https://periodicos.ufrn.br/constituicaoegarantiadedireitos/article/viewFile/10327/7300
- Carrazza, R. A. (2024). Course in Constitutional Tax Law (35th ed.). JusPodivm.
- Carrazza, R. A., & Barreni, S. R. (2019). Prohibition of Confiscatory Effects in Tax Law: Enshrinement, Application, and Identification of Objective Limits. Rdiet, 14, 28-52.
- Coêlho, S. C. N. (2016). Judicial Review of Laws and the Power to Tax under the 1988 Federal Constitution (4th ed.). Forense.
- Costa, R. H. (2022). Course in Tax Law: Constitution and the National Tax Code (12th ed.). SaraivaJur.
- Englisch, J., & Kube, H. (2023). Constitutional Requirements for Substantive Tax Law in Federal Republic of Germany. Review of International and European Economic Law, 2 . https://rieel.com/index.php/rieel/article/view/46
- Filgueira, E. F. B., & Valadão, M. A. P. (2020). The Principle of Non-Confiscation and Its Delimiting Criteria. Revista Jurídica (FURB), 24, 1-24.
- Moraes, A. de (2023). Constitutional Law (39th ed.). Atlas.
- Nakagaki, R. K. (2010). The Principle of Non-Confiscation in Tax Law . Master’s Thesis (Law), Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo (PUC-SP).
- Oliveira, A. M. de, & Borges, A. de M. (2016). Limitations on the Principle of Contributive Capacity: Minimum Existential and Confiscation. Conpedi Law Review, 2, 180-200. https://doi.org/10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2016.v2i4.3660
- Saraiva Filho, O. O. P. (2021). Fundamental Rights of Taxpayers: A Tribute to Jurist Gilmar Ferreira Mendes (p. 77). Almedina.
- Schoueri, L. E. (2023). Tax Law (12th ed.). SaraivaJur.