The Influence of Fiscal Consequences on the Brazilian Supreme Court’s Ratio decidendi in Tax Matters
- 1 School of Law, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Abstract
This paper examines the extent to which economic consequences—particularly aggregate fiscal impact—enter the Brazilian Supreme Court’s (Supremo Tribunal Federal, STF) ratio decidendi in tax cases. The article advances the hypothesis on tax cases after the recent legislation that incorporates the consequentialist arguments in Brazil. We hypothesize that consequentialist arguments have been used by STF to decide tax matters in Brazil not only as time-management techniques, such as modulation, but also regarding the merit. The Case selection followed: (i) judgments with general repercussion; (ii) references to fiscal or macroeconomic effects; and (iii) the discussions of modulation of effects. Using a hypothetico-deductive method and STF landmark cases, we offer an analytical grid to conclude that consequentialism has gained relevance in recent years due to the Supreme Federal Court comparing with taxpayers’ constitutional tax principles.
- Alvim, T. A. (2021). Modulação na alteração da jurisprudência firme ou de precedentes vinculantes (2nd ed., p. 23). Thomson Reuters Brasil.
- Ávila, H. (2015). A Inconstitucionalidade da Inclusão do ICMS na Base de Cálculo do PIS/COFINS. In Contribuições e Imposto sobre a Renda: Estudos e pareceres (pp. 27-28). Malheiros.
- Barreni, S. (2024). Modulação de efeitos em matéria tributária (p. 132). Almedina.
- Becho, R. L. (2020). The Application of Judicial Precedents as a Way to Reduce Brazilians Tax Lawsuits. Beijing Law Review, 11, 729-739. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2020.113044
- Blackstone, W. (1723-1780). Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England .
- Blackstone, W. (1975). Commentaries on the Laws of England (pp. 69-70).
- Carrazza, R. A. (2015). Curso de Direito Constitucional Tributário (30th Edição, pp. 443, 482). Editora Malheiros.
- Carrazza, R. A. (2019). Curso de Direito Constitucional Tributário (32nd ed., pp. 292-293). Malheiros.
- Carvalho, C. (2018). Teoria da Decisão Tributária (p. 339). Almedina Brasil.
- Carvalho, P. de B. (2021). Direito Tributário, Linguagem e Método (8ª Edição, pp. 133, 181, 178). Editora Noeses.
- Ferraz Jr., T. S. (1981). Segurança Jurídica e Normas Gerais Tributárias. Revista de Direito Tributário, São Paulo, 5 , 51.
- Holmes Jr., O. W. (1897). The Path of the Law. Harvard Law Review, 10, 457-478.
- Holmes Jr., O. W. (2009). The Common Law . Harvard University Press.
- Posner, R. A. (2008). How Judges Think (p. 13). Harvard University Press.
- Ratnapala, S. (2017). Jurisprudence (3rd ed., p. 326). Cambridge Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316716960
- Schoueri, L. E. (2024). Direito Tributário (12a ed., p. 41). Editora Saraiva.