The Antitrust Undertaking Commitment System in the United States: Consent Decrees and Consent Orders
- 1 School of International Law, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China
Abstract
The undertaking commitment system originated in the United States and has gradually been adopted by other countries and regions following the global expansion of U.S. law after World War II. As an important mode of antitrust enforcement, it is of great significance in the swift restoration of fair competition market order, the effective enhancement of antitrust enforcement efficacy, and the efficient conservation of antitrust enforcement resources. In the United States, this system primarily takes two forms: consent decrees and consent orders. China likewise introduced this system in the process of learning from advanced rule-of-law experiences of the West and constructing a socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics, and has applied it extensively in antitrust enforcement practice. This article compares and introduces the antitrust undertaking commitment systems of China and the United States from three aspects: Part I provides a brief overview of the origin and basic theory of the antitrust commitment system; Part II focuses on analyzing the U.S. consent decree and consent order; and Part III examines China’s undertaking commitment system and its application.
- Dau-Schmidt, K. G., Gallo, J. C., Craycraft, J. L., & Parker, C. J. (2000). Department of Justice Antitrust Enforcement, 1955-1997: An Empirical Study. Review of Industrial Organization , 17 , 75-133. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007865923061
- Huang, Y. (2014). Rational Reflection and Interpretive Application of the Commitment System for Undertakings: An Analysis Based on Antitrust Enforcement Practice. Price: Theory & Practice , 5 , 29-31.
- Jiao, H. T. (2017). The Commitment System in the Implementation of Anti-Monopoly Law (p. 151). Law Press China.
- Jiao, H. T. (2020). Introduction of the Principle of Proportionality in the Amendment of China’s Anti-Monopoly Law. Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law, 2 3 , 29-49. (In Chinese)
- Lang, J. T. (2003). Commitment Decisions under Regulation 1/2003: Legal Aspects of a New Kind of Competition Decision. European Competition Law Review , 24 , 347-356. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Commitment+decisions+under+Regulation+1%2F2003+European+Competition+Law+Review+2003+24%288%29+347-356
- Luo, R. R. (2016). Application of Commitment System in Anti-Monopoly of Technology Standardization. Law Science Magazin e, 4 , 94-101.
- Pera, A., & Carpagnano, M. (2008). The Law and Practice of Commitment Decisions: A Comparative Analysis. European Competition Law Review, 29, 669. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=The+law+and+practice+of+commitment+decisions%3A+a+comparative+analysis+European+Competition+Law+Review+2008
- Shi, J. Z. (2022). The Practical Significance and Interpretation of the Newly Amended Anti-Monopoly Law. China Law Review, 4, 182-194.
- State Administration for Market Regulation of China (2020). Interpretation of the Guidelines on Undertakings’ Commitments in Monopoly Cases. https://www.samr.gov.cn/zw/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/xwxcs/art/2023/art_67a76a2124654ffca1754c58aac2d6a9.html
- Yin, J. G. (2013). The Settlement System in Antitrust Enforcement: The Origin of Contractualization of State Intervention. China Legal Publishing House.