Corporate Groups under the Laws of Rwanda: An Economic Reality without Legal Identity
- 1 ENSafrica, Kigali, Rwanda
Abstract
Corporate groups have become common in and dominate the business world. They emerge from reconfiguration of large companies into a multitude of subsidiaries from the simplest radial structure to the complex pyramidal and circular structures, in all structures, all companies within the group being ultimately held by a single parent company. Despite the omnipresence of corporate groups and their place in business world, their legal nature is yet to be seen whereas the use of this structure (corporate groups) to conduct business leads to tensions with traditional corporate law notions of each company being a separate legal entity and the blurring of lines of independence and modus operandi of corporate groups can be dangerous for creditors, employees, minority shareholders and pose challenges for regulators (such as taxman and anti-trust regulatory bodies) assessing the status of transactions conducted within the group. This article will discuss the notion of corporate groups under the laws of Rwanda and will argue that, albeit the fact that corporate groups (under traditional principles of corporate law) do not have legal existence, in some branches of law such as tax, anti-trust, employment, banking and finance law, the same have got a legal recognition and are treated as such. However, it will be submitted that the tenor of and challenges posed by corporate groups call for a clear recognition and stand of the legislator on the legal nature of corporate groups.
- Andrew, P., Richard, J. T., Marc, S., Gary, G., Joseph, S., & Coq, V. (2002). The Economic and Commercial Benefits of Corporate Guarantee: An International Comparison. Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, 259-263.
- Barthelemy, M., & Philippe, J. (1996). Companies. Editions Francis Lefebvre.
- Bertrand, L. (2013). The Liability of Parents Companies Vis-à-Vis Their Subsidiaries in Labour Law. Paris: Panthéon-Assas Paris II University.
- Blouin, J., Huizinga, H., Laeven, L., & Nicodème, G. (2014). Thin Capitalization Rules and Corporate Leverage. http://www.voxeu.org/article/thin-capitalisation-rules-and-corporate-leverage
- Blumberg, P. (2005). The Transformation of Modern Corporation Law: The Law of Corporate Groups. Connectcut Law Review, 605.
- Bouchard, C. (1997). The Legal Personality Demystified: Contribution to the Definition of the Legal Nature of Companies of Quebecois Persons. Saint Foy: Laval University Press.
- Danny, O. (2011). Global Transfer Pricing Trends. International Transfer Pricing Journal, 119.
- Desfeuillet, M. (2002). Corporate Groups Confronted to the Theory of Abnormal Acts of Management. Robert Schuman University.
- Dickfos, J. (2011). Enterprise Liability for Corporate Groups: A More Efficient Outcome for Creditors. Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 25, 242-273.
- Didier, P. (1996). Commercial Law. RIDC, 222-513.
- Duet, A. C. (2007a). Being or Not Being: The Group as a Unified Enterprise or a Body of Companies? A Sociological Approach. Law and Companies, 615. https://www.cairn.info/revue-droit-et-societe-2007-3-page-615.htm
- Duet, A. C. (2007b). The Governance of Corporate Groups, Relationships between Property and Power to the Test of Relations of Contemporary Enterprise. Université de Pierre Mendes France-Grenoble II.
- Estrabaud, P. (2014). Corporate Groups in Anti-Trust Law and Tax Law. Paris: Pantheon Assas, Paris II University.
- European Commission (2015). Commission Decides Selective Tax Advantages for Fiat in Luxembourg and Starbucks in the Netherlands Are Illegal under EU State Aid Rules. Brussels: European Commission.
- Gauthier, T. (2002). Directors and Corporate Groups. Litec.
- George, R., René, R., & Germain, M. (1993). The Traitize of Commercial Law. L.G.D.J., n° 1608.