Crimea’s independence from Ukraine and merging with Russia is an incident of great geopolitical significance after the Cold War, which took place against the background of the long-term geopolitical struggle. Russia used force in the incident, which Russia tried to justify mainly with grounds of protecting its nationals and having been invited by both president Yanukovych and the local government of Crimea. But the grounds cannot prove that Russia’s use of force accords with the exceptions to the principle of prohibition of the use of force addressed in the UN Charter or conforms to the already disputed relevant principles of “intervention by invitation” and so Russia’s use of force is illegal. This article presents a comprehensive and deep analysis of the illegality of Russia’s use of force in the event and therefore, will not only provide convincing legal grounds for the illegality of Crimea’s independence from Ukraine and incorporation into Russia, but also be helpful for assessing the future development of strategic relations between Russia and the west in particular and even between powers in general.
KeywordsCrimeaRussiaUkraineUse of Force
Azubuike, E. C. (2011). Probing the Scope of Self Defense in International Law. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, XVII, 141.
Alexandrov, S. (1996). Self-Defence against the Use of Force in International Law. Hague: Kluwer Law International, 98.
Balouziyeh, J. (2014). Russia’s Annexation of Crimea: An Analysis under the Principles of Jus ad Bellum.
Berry, L. (2014). Putin Admits Russian Soldiers Were in Crimea, Slams West for Role in Ukraine Crisis. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/17/putin-ukraine_n_5165913.html
Corten, O. (2010). The Law against War: The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd., 91-92.
Crawford, J. (2012). Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th ed., p. 754). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199699698.001.0001
Defensor-Santiago, S. (2013). Sabah Issue in International Law. Philippine Daily Inquirer, March 23.
Dronova, K. (2014). UN Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine: Why Is It Important? http://voxukraine.org/2014/04/26/58/
Eichensehr, K. (2008). Defending Nationals Abroad: Assessing the Lawfulness of Forcible Hostage Rescues. Virginia Journal of International Law, 48, 461-462.
Fox, G. H. (2014). Intervention by Invitation. Wayne State University Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series, No. 4, 1.
Franck, T. M. (1992). The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance. The American Journal of International Law, 86, 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2203138
Gray, C. (2010). The Use of Force and the International Legal Order. In M. D. Evans (Ed.), International Law (p. 627). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199565665.003.0021
Jennings, R., & Watts, A. (1992). Oppenheim’s International Law (9th ed., pp.150-154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kreß, C. (2015). The Fine Line between Collective Self-Defense and Intervention by Invitation: Reflections on the Use of Force against “IS” in Syria. https://www.justsecurity.org/20118/claus-kreb-force-isil-syria/
Larsen, H. (2014). Great Power Politics and the Ukrainian Crisis: NATO, EU and Russia after 2014. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS).
Li, B. (2010). Practical Course of Concise International Law (p. 310). Wuhan: Wuhan University Press.
Lieblich, E. (2011). Intervention and Consent: Consensual Forcible Interventions in Internal Armed Conflicts as International Agreements. Boston University International Law Journal, 29, 340-341.
Lieblich, E. (2012). Intervention in Civil Wars: Intervention and Consent (p. 1). New York: Columbia University.
Paust, J. (2010). Self-Defense Targetings of Non-State Actors and Permissibility of U.S. Use of Drones in Pakistan. Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, 19, 238-239.
Roth, B. R. (2010). Secessions, Coups and the International Rule of Law: Assessing the Decline of the Effective Control Doctrine. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 11, 7.
Ruys, T. (2008). The “Protection of Nationals” Doctrine Revisited (p. 4). Working Paper No. 17. https://www.law.kuleuven.be/iir/nl/onderzoek/wp/WP129e.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krn025
Saul, B. (2014). The Battle for Legal Legitimacy in Crimea. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-03/saul-the-battle-for-legal-legitimacy-in-crimea/5294828
Shao, J. (2008). International Law (p. 424). Beijing: Beijing University Press.
Shevchenko, V. (2014). “Little Green Men” or “Russian Invaders”? BBC Monitoring. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26532154
Stallard, K. (2015). Putin Comes Clean on Crimea’s Little Green Men. http://news.sky.com/story/1442038/putin-comes-clean-on-crimeas-little-green-men
Sun, J. (2014). The Resolution for Abolishing the Law on the Principles of State Language Policy Didn’t Pass in Ukraine. http://gb.cri.cn/42071/2014/03/04/6071s4447257.htm
Sun, S. (2014). Analysis of the Incorporation into Russia through Referendum in the Perspective of International Law. Law Review, No. 5, 139.
Talmon, S. (1998). Recognition of Governments in International Law: With Particular Reference to Governments in Exile (pp. 147-149). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wang, L. (2014). Timeline of the Ukraine Crisis.
Wippman, D. (1996). Military Intervention, Regional Organizations, and Host-State Consent. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 7, 209-240.
Wisehart, D. (2014). The Crisis in Ukraine and the Prohibition of the Use of Force: A Legal Basis for Russia’s Intervention? http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-crisis-in-ukraine-and-the-prohibition-of-the-use-of-force-a-legal-basis-for-russias-intervention/
Yang, S., & Wang, S. (2014). The Development of Russia-Belarus Customs Union and Its Impact. International Studies, No. 4, 94-112.
Yu, M. (2004). Legal Characterization of “Armed Attack”. Law Review, No. 1, 17-28.
Zemanek, K. (2013). Armed Attack. Oxford Public International Law. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e241#
Zhou, Q. (1998). America’s Human Rights Diplomacy and Relevant Disputes. Chinese Journal of American Studies, No. 1, 29-56.