Penalty Clauses: A Comparative Analysis between the Turkish and Ethiopian Laws
- 1 Law at Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
Abstract
Both the Ethiopian Civil Code and the Turkish Code of Obligation recognized party autonomy to agree a penalty clause either as an ex-ante estimation of a possible damage from non-performance of an obligation or as a sanction for default. But, despite the fact that both countries adhered to the continental legal system, there are considerable differences between the two regarding the regulation of penalty clauses. The paper examines the regulation of penalty clauses in legal literature as well as the laws of the two countries. It, in particular, analyses the two laws on the type of principal obligations that can be secured by penalty clauses, the possibility of claiming the enforcement of both the contract and the penalty, the relation between fault of the debtor & damaged suffered by the creditor on one hand and the enforcement of the agreed penalty on the other hand as well as possible court intervention in altering the free wills of the parties. A comparative approach is used throughout the paper in which the differences and similarities of the two systems are examined.
- Benjamin, P. (1960). Penalties, Liquidated Damages and Penal Clauses in Commercial Contracts: A Comparative Study of English and Continental Law. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 9, 600-627. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/9.4.600
- Calleros, C. (2006). Punitive Damages, Liquidated Damages, and Clauses Pénales in Contract Actions: A Comparative Analysis of the American Common Law and the French Civil Code. Brook. J. INT’L L, 32, 69-119.
- Cansel, E., & Ozel, C. (2007). Penalty Clauses under the Turkish Law of Obligation. (In Turkish) http://journal.yasar.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/19-E.CANSEL-%C3%87.-%C3%96ZEL
- Cinar O. (2009). Reduction of Penalty Clauses under the Turkish Code of Obligation and the German Civil Code (Turkish). Istanbul Ticaret University Journal of Social Science, 8, 91-115.
- Civil Code of the Empire of Ethiopia (CCE), Proclamation No. 165/1960.
- Commercial Code of the Empire of Ethiopia, Proclamation No. 166/1960.
- Council of Europe Resolution (78) 3 Relating to Penal Clauses in Civil Law (1978).
- De Geest, G., &Wuyts F. (1999). Penalty Clauses and Liquidated Damages. https://reference.findlaw.com/lawandeconomics/4610-penalty-clauses-and-liquidated-damages.pdf
- Erdem, M. (2009). Determination of Compensation by Agreement. (In Turkish) http://webftp.gazi.edu.tr/hukuk/sorumluluk/s_5.pdf
- Eren, F. (1999). General Provisions of the Law of Obligations (5th ed.). Istanbul: Beta. (In Turkish)
- García, M. I. (2012). Enforcement of Penalty Clauses in Civil and Common Law: A Puzzle to Be Solved by the Contracting Parties. European Journal of Legal Studies, 5, 95-124.
- Gassim Obeidat, M. Y. (2004). The “Penalty” Clause in English Law: A Critical Analysis and Comparison with Jordanian Law. PHD Thesis, Leeds: University of Leeds.
- Graves, J. (2012). Penalty Clauses and the CISG. Journal of Law and Commerce, 30, 153-172. https://doi.org/10.5195/JLC.2012.2
- International Institute for the Unification of Private Laws (UNIDROIT) (2010). Principles on International Commercial Contracts. Rome.
- Kilicoglu, M. A. ( 2015). General Provisions of the Law of Obligation (Turkish) (19th ed.). Ankara: Turhal KitabEvi yayinlar.
- Mulugeta, M. A. (2010). Ethiopia. In International Encyclopedia of Laws: Contracts. Kluwer Law International.