The Protection of Cruise Passengers and the Athens Convention
- 1 Centre for International Shipping Policy and Law Studies, School of Law, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
Abstract
The partly application of the Athens Convention 1974 by Shanghai Maritime Court in Miss Yang v Cruise PLC reflected some problems relating to the application of the Athens Convention 1974 in China and its protection for the cruise passengers. With the popularization of cruise vacation and the development of cruise industry, issues relating to the protection of cruise passengers gain growing attentions. Law application and jurisdiction is essential for the protection of cruise passengers. This paper will discuss the need for legal protection of cruise passengers versus carriers, and explore the application of the Athens Convention 1974 to cruise passengers, in particular, the relations between its application and choice of law, its protection for passengers in choosing the court. This paper will carry out a comparative study on the issue of the application of the Athens Convention 1974 to cruise passengers and the issue of its direct effect and supremacy in China and UK. It concludes that the Athens Convention 1974 is applicable to cruise passengers, it shall have direct effect and supremacy in Chinese court, and China should accede to the 2002 Protocol to the Athens Convention 1974 for better protection of the cruise passengers.
- Berlingieri, F. (2014). International Maritime Conventions: Volume 1 the Carriage of Goods and Passengers by Sea (p. 260). London: Informa Law from Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315796451
- CLIA (2018). Cruise Lines International Association Updates Official 2017 Global Passenger Numbers. https://www.cruising.org/about-the-industry/press-room/press-releases/pr/cruise-lines-international-association-updates-official-2017-global-passenger-numbers
- Guo, P. (2016). A Study on Legal Nature of Cruise Contract. Chinese Journal of Maritime Law, 27, 55-62.
- Han, D. P. (2014). Private International Law (p. 26). Beijing: Higher Education Press.
- IMO (2018). Status of IMO Treaties: Comprehensive Information on the Status of Multilateral Conventions and Instruments in Respect of Which the International Maritime Organization or Its Secretary-General Performs Depositary or Other Functions. http://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/StatusOfConventions/Documents/Status%20-%202018.pdf
- Li, H. P. (2003). Introduction to Law of Treaty (pp. 314-317). Beijing: Law Press.
- Peltz, R. (2012). The Athens Convention Revisited. Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, 43, 491.
- Soyer, B. (2002). Sundry Considerations on the Draft Protocol to the Athens Convention Relating to the Carriage of Passengers and Their Luggage by Sea 1974. Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, 33, 519.
- Soyer, B., & Leloudas, G. (2018). Carriage of Passengers by Sea: A Critical Analysis of the International Regime. Michigan State International Law Review, 26, 483.
- Waldron, A. (1991). The Theory and Practice of a Carrier’s Liability under the Athens Convention—The English Experience. Maritime Policy and Management, 18, 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839100000004
- Wu, H. N. (1996). Maritime Law (p. 148). Beijing: Law Press.