This paper aims to highlight some of the key issues surrounding the development and application of immigration law as it applies in the United Kingdom (UK) to refugees attempting to be reunited with their families living abroad. The right for refugees to be reunited with their families is enshrined in international law, but this is frequently frustrated by the legal and administrative systems used in the UK. Using content analysis and doctrinal analysis techniques, the paper provides an examination of how a philosophy which considers the emotional effects of the law, therapeutic jurisprudence, could be used not only to inform interpretation of current domestic laws, but also influence the drafting of future legislation. This is an aspect of current refugee law in the United Kingdom which has yet to be examined. It provides, we argue, a humanitarian direction to statutory interpretation which may provide tangible benefits to current and proposed legal systems.
KeywordsRefugeesFamily ReunionTherapeutic JurisprudencePurposive InterpretationRefugee (Family Reunion) Bill
Beswick, J. (2015). Not So Straightforward: The Need for Qualified Legal Support in Refugee Family Reunion. London: British Red Cross.
Boswell, C. (2002). Addressing the Causes of Migratory and Refugee Movements: The Role of the European Union. New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 73, Switzerland: UNHCR Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit.
Castles, S. (2011). Understanding Global Migration: A Social Transformation Perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 1565. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2010.489381
Connell, J., Mulvey, G., Brady, J., & Christie, G. (2010). One Day We Will Be Reunited: Experiences of Refugee Family Reunion in the UK. Glasgow: Scottish Refugee Council.
Cruz, E. H. (2009). Through the Clinical Lens: A Pragmatic Look at Infusing Therapeutic Jurisprudence into Clinical Pedagogy. Thomas Jefferson Law Review, 30, 463-485.
Dagilyte, E., & Coe, P. (2014). Professionalism in Higher Education: Important Not Only for Lawyers. The Law Teacher, 48, 36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2013.875303
Diesen, C. (2007). Therapeutic Jurisprudence—An Introduction from a Swedish Perspective. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 51, 131-162.
Donoghue, J. (2014). Transforming Criminal Justice? Problem-Solving and Court Specialisation. Routledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice, Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
Douglas, S. (2015). Incorporating Emotional Intelligence in Legal Education: A Theoretical Perspective. E-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship Teaching, 9, 56-71.
Faist, T. (2000). The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198293910.001.0001
Fortuny, K., Hernandez, D. J., & Chaudry, A. (2010). Young Children of Immigrants: The Leading Edge of America’s Future. Washington DC: Urban Institute. https://doi.org/10.1037/e721852011-001
Gal, T., & Wexler, D. B. (2015). Synergizing Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Positive Criminology. In N. Ronel, & D. Segev (Eds.), Positive Criminology (pp. 85-97). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315796536-6
Gerdy, K. B. (2008). Clients, Empathy, and Compassion: Introducing First-Year Students to the “Heart” of Lawyering. Nebraska Law Review, 87, 18.
Goldberg, S. (2011). Problem-Solving in Canada’s Courtrooms: A Guide to Therapeutic Justice. Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Paper 3, Ottawa: National Judicial Institute. https://www.nji-inm.ca/index.cfm/publications/problem-solving-in-canada-s-courtrooms-a-guide-to-therapeutic-justice-2nd-edition/?langSwitch=en
Goodman, R. D., Vesely, C. K., Letiecq, B., & Cleaveland, C. L. (2017). Trauma and Resilience among Refugee and Undocumented Immigrant Women. Journal of Counselling and Development, 95, 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12145
Goodwin-Gill, G. (2001). Editorial: Asylum 2001—A Convention and A Purpose. International Journal of Refugee Law, 13, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/13.1_and_2.1
Gower, M., & McGuiness, T. (2016). The UK’s Refugee Family Reunion Rules: Striking the Right Balance? Briefing Paper No. 07511, London: House of Commons Library. http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/58ac50564.pdf
Harris, C. (2018). There Is No Access to Justice If the Public Cannot Understand It. Thetimes.co.uk 20 September. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/law/there-is-no-access-to-justice-if-the-public-cannot -understand-it-przdt50rn
Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence—From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. New York: Basic Books.
Home Office/Department for Children and Families (2009). Every Child Matters.
Hora, P. F. (2002). A Dozen Years of Drug Court Treatment Courts: Uncovering Our Theoretical Foundation and the Construction of a Mainstream. Paradigm Substance Use and Misuse, 37, 1469-1488. https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014419
Hora, P. F., Schma, W. G., & Rosenthal, J. T. A. (1999). Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Drug Treatment Court Movement: Revolutionizing the Criminal Justice System’s Response to Drug Abuse and Crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review, 74, 439-537.
House of Lords and House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights (2004). The Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Specification of Particularly Serious Crimes) Order 2004. Twenty-Second Report of Session 2003-04, HL Paper 190, HC 1212.
Inter-Governmental Consultation on Asylum, Refugee and Migration Policies in Europe, North America and Australia (1997). Report on Family Reunification: Overview of Policies and Practices in IGC Participating States.
Jastram, K., & Newland, K. (2003). Family Unity and Refugee Protection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.refworld.org/docid/470a33be0.html
KPMG (2014). Evaluation of the Drug Court of Victoria. Final Report Magistrates’ Court of Victoria. Government Advisory Services, Australia. https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2014/12/apo-nid54071-1194101.pdf
Legal Action (2014). Review of Evidence to LASPO Act Impact Inquiry (p. 9).
Lens, V., Katz, C. C., & Suarez, K. S. (2016). Case Workers in Family Court: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 68, 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.06.027
Letiecq, B. L., Grzywacz, J. G., Gray, K. M., & Eudave, Y. M. (2014). Depression among Mexican Men on the Frontier: The Role of Family Separation and Other Structural and Situational Stressors. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 16, 1193-1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-013-9918-1
Maroney, T. A. (2006). Law and Emotion: A Proposed Taxonomy of an Emerging Field. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 119-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9029-9
Marson, J., & Ferris, K. (2018). After Arrival, the Problems Facing Refugees and Their Families: A Clinical Legal Response. International Journal of Clinical Legal Education, 25, 185-217. https://doi.org/10.19164/ijcle.v25i2.726
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1994). Narrowing the Gap by Narrowing the Field: What’s Mission from the Mac-Crate Report—of Skills, Legal Science and Being a Human Being. Washington Law Review, 69, 593.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (2001). Summary Conclusions on Family Unity. Global Consultations on International Protection, Geneva Expert Roundtable 8-9 Nov. 2001.
Patry, M. W. (1998). Better Legal Counseling through Empirical Research: Identifying Psycholegal Soft Spots and Strategies. California Western Law Review, 34, 439-455.
Pereira, K. M., Crosnoe, R., Fortuny, K., Pedroza, J.-M., Ulvestad, K., Weiland, C., Yoshikawa, H., & Chaudry, A. (2012). Barriers to Immigrants’ Access to Health and Human Services Programs. Washington DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
Perlin, M. L. (1994). Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Understanding the Sanist and Pretextual Bases of Mental Disability Law. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 20, 369-382.
Perlin, M. L. (2012). “Justice’s Beautiful Face”: Bob Sadoff and the Redemptive Promise of Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 40, 265-292. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2002815
Perlin, M. L. (2013). “The Judge, He Cast His Robe Aside”: Mental Health Courts, Dignity and Due Process. Mental Health Law and Policy Journal, 3, 1-28.
Perlin, M. L. (2018). “Changing of the Guards”: David Wexler, Therapeutic Jurisprudence, and the Transformation of Legal Scholarship. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 63, 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.07.001
Perlin, M. L., Gould, K. K., & Dorfman, D. A. (1995). Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Mentally Disabled Persons: Hopeless Oxymoron or Path to Redemption? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 80-119. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8971.1.1.80
Petrucci, C. (2002). Respect as a Component in the Judge-Defendant Interaction in a Specialized Domestic Violence Court that Utilizes Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Criminal Law Bulletin, 28, 263-295.
Refugee Action (2018). Tipping the Scales: Access to Justice in the Asylum System. London: Refugee Action.
Refugee Council and Oxfam (2018). Safe But Not Settled: The Impact of Family Separation on Refugees in the UK. https://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/safe-but-not-settled-the-impact-of-family -separation-on-refugees-in-the-uk-620409
Schumm, J. A., Stines, L. R., Hobfoll, S. E., & Jackson, A. P. (2005). The Double Barreled Burden of Child Abuse and Current Stressful Circumstances on Adult Women: The Kindling Effect of Early Traumatic Experience. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18, 467-476. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20054
Scottish Refugee Council (2010). “One Day We Will Be Reunited” Experiences of Refugee Family Reunion in the UK. Scottishrefugeecouncil.org.uk.
Settle, M. (2018). SNP MP Angus Brendan MacNeil Makes Parliamentary Bid to End “Grievous Injustice” for Syrian Refugees. The Sunday Herald. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/16090953.snp-mp-angus-brendan-macneil-makes -parliamentary-bid-to-end-grievous-injustice-for-syrian-refugees/
Silver, M. A. (1999). Emotional Intelligence and Legal Education. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 1173-1203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.5.4.1173
Sneath, G. R. (1985). Case Note: The Purposive Approach. Statute Law Review, 6, 116. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/6.1.175
Staver, A. (2008). Family Reunification: A Right for Forced Migrants? Refugee Studies Centre Working Paper Series 51.
Stolle, D. P., & Wexler, D. B. (1997). Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Preventive Law: A Combined Concentration to Invigorate the Everyday Practice of Law. Arizona Law Review, 39, 25-33.
Stolle, D. P., Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (2000). Practicing Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Stotz, S. J., Elbert, T., Müeller, V., & Schauer, M. (2015). The Relationship between Trauma, Shame, and Guilt: Findings from a Community-Based Study of Refugee Minors in Germany. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 6, Article ID: 25863. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v6.25863
The Right Honourable the Lord Woolf (1996). Access to Justice Final Report. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20060213205513/http://www.dca.gov.uk/civil/final/ contents.htm
Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond Formal Procedures: The Interpersonal Context of Procedural Justice. In J. S. Carroll (Ed.), Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings (pp. 77-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315728377-4
UNICEF United Kingdom (2016). For Every Child in Danger. The Refuge of the Family: How the UK Government Can Help Children Fleeing Danger Reach the Safety of Family. https://downloads.unicef.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Unicef_TheRefugeOfFamily_briefing.pdf
van Bueren, G. (1995). The International Protection of Family Members’ Rights as the 21st Century Approaches. Human Rights Quarterly, 17, 734-735. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.1995.0040
Walshaw, G. (2014). Concurrent Legal Interpretation versus Moderate Intentionalism. Statute Law Review, 35, 244-260. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmt025
Wexler, D. B. (1999). Therapeutic Jurisprudence: An Overview. Public Lecture Given at the Thomas Cooley Law Review Disabilities Law Symposium, Para 41.
Wexler, D. B. (2005). Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Rehabilitative Role of the Criminal Defense Lawyer. St. Thomas Law Review, 17, 743-774.
Wexler, D. B. (2008). Rehabilitating Lawyers: Principles of Therapeutic Jurisprudence for Criminal Law Practice. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Wexler, D. B. (2011a). From Theory to Practice and Back Again in Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Now Comes the Hard Part. Monash University Law Review, 37, 33-42.
Wexler, D. B. (2011b). Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Criminal Law Practice, and Relation-Centered Lawyering. Chapman Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1456463
Wexler, D. B. (2013). Getting and Giving: What Therapeutic Jurisprudence Can Get from and Give to Positive Criminology. Phoenix Law Review, 6, 907-915. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2220509
Wexler, D. B. (2014a). Moving Forward on Mainstreaming Therapeutic Jurisprudence: An Ongoing Process to Facilitate the Therapeutic Design and Application of the Law. Therapeutic Jurisprudence (Paper 6). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2564613
Wexler, D. B. (2014b). New Wine in New Bottles: The Need to Sketch a Therapeutic Jurisprudence “Code” of Proposed Criminal Processes and Practices (p. 470). Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 12-16.
Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (1991). Essays in Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (1996). Law in a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (2006). The Use of Therapeutic Jurisprudence in Law School Clinical Education: Transforming the Criminal Law. Clinical Law Review, 13, 605-632.
Winick, B. J. (2000). Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Role of Counsel in Litigation. California Western Law Review, 37, 105-120.
Winick, B. J., & Wexler, D. B. (2003). Judging in a Therapeutic Key, Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Courts. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Yoshikawa, H., Godfrey, E. B., & Rivera, A. C. (2008). Access to Institutional Resources as a Measure of Social Exclusion: Relations with Family Process and Cognitive Development in the Context of Immigration. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 121, 63-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.223