Designing Accessible Learning Outcomes Assessments through Intentional Test Design
- 1 Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA
- 2 Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA
Abstract
Postsecondary students represent a diverse population with unique learning needs that may impact their ability to accurately demonstrate their knowledge and skills on traditional forms of learning outcomes assessments. Designing assessments is a complex process that includes specifying the assessed content and designing the actual test. Both components should work together to accurately measure key learning outcomes and generate reliable results. This process, however, is often difficult to execute. While the faculty have considera ble content expertise, many lack experience in designing high - quality assessments that are also accessible to students with diverse needs and preferences. This article discusses the importance of designing accessible learning outcomes assessments, provides a framework for designing accessible assessments that are grounde d in universal design principles, and lays out step-by-step actions faculty can take to improve the accessibility of their assessments. Examples of accessible assessments are provided.
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
- Bevitt, S. (2015). Assessment Innovation and Student Experience: A New Assessment Challenge and Call for a Multi-Perspective Approach to Assessment Research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40, 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.890170
- Douglas, M., Wilson, J., & Ennis, S. (2012). Multiple-Choice Question Tests: A Convenient, Flexible, and Effective Tool? A Case Study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49, 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.677596
- Haladyna, T., & Downing, S. M. (2004). Construct Irrelevant Variance in High Stakes Testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23, 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2004.tb00149.x
- Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., & Crawford, L. (2011). Improving Accommodations Assignment: Reconceptualizing Professional Development to Support Accommodations Decision Making. In M. Russell, & M. Kavanaugh (Eds.), Assessing Students in the Margins: Challenges, Strategies, and Techniques. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
- Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Crawford, L., & Huscroft-D’Angelo, J. N. (2014). Screening to Assign Accommodations: Using Data to Make Decisions. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20, 61-74. https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2014-V20-I2-5277
- Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Johnstone, C., & Thurlow, M. (2015). Universal Design of Assessment. In S. Burgstahler (Ed.), Universal Design in Higher Education: From Principles to Practice (2nd ed., pp. 163-175). Boston, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Yovanoff, P., & Tindal, G. (2007). Developing a New Paradigm for Accommodations Research. Exceptional Children, 73, 331-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300304
- Lane, S., Raymond, M. R., Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (2016). Test Development Process. In S. Lane, M. R. Raymond, & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of Test Development (2nd Ed., pp. 3-18). New York: Taylor & Francis.
- Lindholm, J. A., Szelenyi, K., Hurtado, S., & Korn, W. S. (2005). The American College Teacher: National Norms for the 2004-2005 HERI Faculty Survey. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
- Magnus, E., & Tossebro, J. (2014). Negotiating Individual Accommodation in Higher Education. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 16, 316-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2012.761156