The present research examined creative drawing processes in teams of gifted adolescents with different educational specializations, including teams with homogeneous (the same specialization) and heterogeneous (mixed specialization) composition. Based on the converging evidence from protocol and Linkography analyses, we identified the differences in frequency and dynamic distribution of distinct creative processes between the different teams specializing in visual art, natural science, humanities, as well as mixed specialization teams. Visualization processes played a crucial role for visual art, science, mixed, but not for humanities teams. All teams except humanities had visual planning earlier in the creative process. Visual artists’ visualization processes developed prominently and continuously throughout all stages of creative production with the main focus on visual aesthetics while for scientists, they developed more discreetly, and in conjunction with understanding of function. Mixed and visual art teams shared many similarities, and they had the highest level of integration between the ideas expressed during their creative processes. Mixed team had higher frequency of organizational processes, indicating coordination and organization challenges due to their diversity. The results of this research show the importance of considering differences in visualization profiles while composing teams of different specializations.
Aggarwal, I., & Woolley, A. W. (2013). Do You See What I See? The Effect of Members’ Cognitive Styles on Team Processes and Errors in Task Execution. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.04.003
Atman, C. J., Chimka, J. R., Bursic, K. M., & Nachtmann, H. (1999). A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes. Design Studies, 20, 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00031-3
Austin, S., Steele, J., Macmillan, S., Kirby, P., & Spence, R. (2001). Mapping the Conceptual Design Activity of Interdisciplinary Teams. Design Studies, 22, 211-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00026-0
Banks, A. P., & Millward, L. J. (2000). Running Shared Mental Models as a Distributed Cognitive Process. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712600161961
Bilda, Z., Costello, B., & Amitani, S. (2006). Collaborative Analysis Framework for Evaluating Interactive Art Experience. CoDesign, 2, 225-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880601008026
Blazhenkova, O., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2010). Visual-Object Ability: A New Dimension of Non-Verbal Intelligence. Cognition, 117, 276-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.021
Blazhenkova, O., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2016). Types of Creativity and Visualization in Teams of Different Educational Specialization. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1162638
Blazhenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., & Becker, M. (2011). Object-Spatial Imagery and Cognitive Styles in Children and Adolescents: Developmental Trajectories in Relation to Ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.012
Cai, H., Do, E. Y.-L., & Zimring, C. M. (2010). Extended Linkography and Distance Graph in Design Evaluation: An Empirical Study of the Dual Effects of Inspiration Sources in Creative Design. Design Studies, 31, 146-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.12.003
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared Mental Models in Expert Team Decision Making. In N. J. Castellan Jr. (Ed.), Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (1992). An Empirical Study into Design Thinking. In N. Cross, K. Dorst, & N. Roozenburg (Eds.), Research in Design Thinking (pp. 119-126). Delft: Delft University Press.
Cronin, M. A., & Weingart, L. R. (2007). Representational Gaps, Information Processing, and Conflict in Functionally Diverse Teams. Academy of Management Review, 32, 761-774. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275511
Dong, A. (2005). The Latent Semantic Approach to Studying Design Team Communication. Design Studies, 26, 445-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.10.003
Dunbar, K. (1999). The Scientist in Vivo: How Scientists Think and Reason in the Laboratory. In L. Magnani, N. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds). Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery (pp. 89-98). New York: Plenum Press.
Edmonds, E., & Leggett, M. (2010). How Artists Fit into the Research Processes. Leonardo, 43, 194-195. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2010.43.2.194
Egan, T. M. (2005). Creativity in the Context of Team Diversity: Team Leader Perspectives. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7, 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422305274526
Goldschmidt, G. (1990). Linkography: Assessing Design Productivity. In R. Trappl (Ed.), Cybernetics and Systems 90. Proceedings of the Tenth European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research (pp. 291-298). Singapore: World Scientific.
Goldschmidt, G. (1992). Criteria for Design Evaluation: A Process-Oriented Paradigm. In Y. E. Kalay (Ed.), Evaluating and Predicting Design (pp. 67-79). New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)00009-3
Goldschmidt, G. (1995). The Designer as a Team of One. Design Studies, 16, 189-209.
Goldschmidt, G., & Tatsa, D. (2005). How Good Are Good Ideas? Correlates of Design Creativity. Design Studies, 26, 593-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.02.004
Gooding, D. (2004). Cognition, Construction and Culture: Visual Theories in the Sciences. Journal of Culture and Cognition, 4, 551-593. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568537042484896
Hackman, J. R., & Hackman, R. J. (2002). Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Hagaman, S. (1990). The Community of Inquiry: An Approach to Collaborative Learning. Studies in Art Education, 31, 149-157. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320762
Hirsch, P. L., Shwom, B. L., Yarnoff, C., Anderson, J. C., Kelso, D. M., Olson, G. B., & Colgate, J. E. (2001). Engineering Design and Communication: The Case for Interdisciplinary Collaboration. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17, 343-348.
Kan, J. W. T., Bilda, Z., & Gero, J. S. (2007). Comparing Entropy Measures of Idea Links in Design Protocols: Linkography Entropy Measurement and Analysis of Differently Conditioned Design Sessions. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 21, 367-377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060407000339
Kan, J. W., & Gero, J. S. (2005). Can Entropy Indicate the Richness of Idea Generation in Team Designing. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (pp. 451-457). New Delhi, India: TVB.
Kan, J. W. T., & Gero, J. S. (2007). Can an Objective Measurement of Design Protocols Reflect the Quality of a Design Outcome? In ICED07 (pp. 1-12). Paris: Ecole Centrale de Paris.
Kan, J. W. T., & Gero, J. S. (2008). Acquiring Information from Linkography in Protocol Studies of Designers. Design Studies, 29, 315-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.03.001
Kan, J. W. T., & Gero, J. S. (2009). Using the FBS Ontology to Capture Semantic Design Information in Design Protocol Studies. In J. McDonnell, & P. Lloyd (Eds.), About: Designing. Analysing Design Meetings (pp. 213-229). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Keefe, D., Karelitz, D., Vote, E., & Laidlaw, D. H. (2005). Artistic Collaboration in Designing VR Visualizations. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 25, 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2005.34
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639402000206
Kozbelt, A. (2001). Artists as Experts in Visual Cognition. Visual Cognition, 8, 705-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280042000090
Kozhevnikov, M., Blazhenkova, O., & Becker, M. (2010). Trade-Off in Object versus Spatial Visualization Abilities: Restriction in the Development of Visual Processing Resources. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 29-35. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.29
Kozhevnikov, M., Kozhevnikov, M., Chen, J. Y., & Blazhenkova, O. (2013). Creativity, Visualization Abilities, and Visual Cognitive Style. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 196-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12013
Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S. M., & Shepard, J. (2005). Spatial versus Object Visualizers: A New Characterization of Visual Cognitive Style. Memory and Cognition, 33, 710-726. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195337
Kraiger, K., & Wenzel, L. H. (1997). Conceptual Development and Empirical Evaluation of Measures of Shared Mental Models as Indicators of Team Effectiveness. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & E. Prince (Eds.), Team Performance Assessment and Measurement (pp. 63-84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kvan, T. (2000). Collaborative Design: What Is It? Automation in Construction, 9, 409-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(99)00025-4
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information Sharing and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535-546. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013773
Meyer, J., Staples, L., Minneman, S., Naimark, M., & Glassner, A. (1998). Artists and Technologists Working Together (Panel). In Proceedings of the 11th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 67-69). New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/288392.289101
Miller, A. I. (1996). Insights of Genius Imagery and Creativity in Science and Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Milliken, F. J., Bartel, C., & Kurtzberg, T. (2003). Diversity and Creativity in Work Groups: A Dynamic Perspective on the Affective and Cognitive Processes That Link Diversity and Performance. In P. B. Paulus, & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group Creativity (pp. 32-62). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0003
Pourmohamadi, M., & Gero, J. S. (2011). Linkographer: An Analysis Tool to Study Design Protocols Based on FBS Coding Scheme. In S. Culley, B. Hicks, T. McAloone, T. Howard, & Y. Reich (Eds.), Design Theory and Methodology (pp. 294-303). Glasgow: Design Society.
Rosenberg, H. S., & Trusheim, W. (1989). Creative Transformations: How Visual Artists, Musicians, and Dancers Use Mental Imagery in Their Work. In P. Robin, & J. E. Schorr (Eds.), Imagery: Current Perspectives (pp. 55-75). New York: Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0876-6_6
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is There a “Big Five” in Teamwork?. Small Group Research, 36, 555-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405277134
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 397-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Sonnenwald, D. H. (1996). Communication Roles That Support Collaboration during the Design Process. Design Studies, 17, 277-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(96)00002-6
Stevelt-Kaser, K., Pennington-Busick, S., & Rhoades, M. (2004). Redefining the Principles and Elements of Educating Artists in the 21st Century. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
Stokols, D., Hall, K. L., Taylor, B. K., & Moser, R. P. (2008). The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S77-S89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002
Terenzini, P. T., Cabrera, A. F., Colbeck, C. L., Parente, J. M., & Bjorklund, S. A. (2001). Collaborative Learning vs. Lecture/Discussion: Students’ Reported Learning Gains. Journal of Engineering Education, 90, 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00579.x
Van der Lugt, R. (2003). Relating the Quality of the Idea Generation Process to the Quality of the Resulting Design Ideas. In DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design (pp. 601-602). Glasgow, UK: Design Society.
Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Science, 330, 686-688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193147
Woolley, A. W., Hackman, J. R., Jerde, T. E., Chabris, C. F., Bennett, S. L., & Kosslyn, S.M. (2007). Using Brain-Based Measures to Compose Teams: How Individual Capabilities and Team Collaboration Strategies Jointly Shape Performance. Social Neuroscience, 2, 96-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910701363041
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science, 316, 1036-1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099