Lesson planning and presentation are regarded as an effective method that allows pre-service teachers to gain experience in the instructional processes and improve teaching skills. Lesson Portfolio and Presentations, not only is utilized as a method for increasing the quality of a teacher’s education, but also used to research the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework. The purpose was to investigate changes in pre-service teachers’ TPACK from their lesson portfolio and presentation practices conducted under the TPACK framework. The participants are 22 third-year pre-service teachers. An analysis was performed based on specific concepts from the projects, which had been developed to reveal the changes in pre-service teachers’ TPACK components. Content analysis was used to analyze the observation forms, self-evaluations, videos and interviews. The study’s findings indicate that pre-service teachers use GeoGebra tools to attain what they had specified in their instructional plans. When considered in terms of the TPACK components, pre-service teachers made noticeable progress.
An, Y.-J., & Reigeluth, C. (2011). Creating Technology-Enhanced, Learner-Centred Classrooms: K-12 Teachers’ Beliefs, Perceptions, Barriers, and Support Needs. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28, 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784681
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and Methodological Issues for the Conceptualization, Development, and Assessment of CT-TPCK: Advances in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52, 154- 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
Artigue, M. (2002). Learning Mathematics in a CAS Environment: The Genesis of a Reflection about Instrumentation and the Dialectics between Technical and Conceptual Work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 245-274. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022103903080
Berthold, K., Eysink, T. H. S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Assisting Self-Explanation Prompts Are More Effective than Open Prompts When Learning with Multiple Representations. Instructional Science, 37, 345-363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9051-z
Bingolbali, E., & Ozmantar, M. F. (2009). Mathematical Difficulties in Elementary Schools and Solution Proposals. In E. Bingolbali, & M. F. Ozmantar (Eds.), Mathematical Misconceptions: Reasons and Seeking Solutions (pp. 1-30). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on the Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cavin, R. M. (2007). Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Pre- Service Teachers through Microteaching Lesson Study. Doctoral Dissertation, Tallahassee, FL: The Florida State University.
Cavin, R. M., & Fernández, M. (2007). Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Pre-Service Math and Science Teachers. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Society for Technology Information and Teacher Education International Conference Proceedings 2007 (pp. 2180-2186). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Duval, R. (1999). Representation, Vision, and Visualization: Cognitive Functions in Mathematical Thinking. Basic Issues for Learning. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 30-26). Cuernavaca.
Fernandez, M. L. (2005). Learning through Microteaching Lesson Study in Teacher Preparation. Action in Teacher Education, 26, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2005.10463341
Gorgen, G. (2003). Effect of Micro-Instruction Practices on Pre-Service Teachers’ Opinions on Instruction n the Classroom. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 24, 56-63.
Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A Framework for Addressing Challenges to Classroom Tech- nology Use. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Journal, 16, 21-46.
Gronlund, N. (2006). Assessment of Student Achievement (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Activity Types: Curriculum-Based Technology Integration Reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 393-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536
Hew, K., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating Technology into K-12 Teaching and Learning: Current Knowledge Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
Hughes, J. (2005). The Role of Teacher Knowledge and Learning Experiences in Forming Technology-Integrated Pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 277-302.
Kafyulilo, A. (2010). Practical Use of ICT in Science and Mathematics Teachers’ Training at DUCE: An Analysis of Prospective Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Know- ledge. Master’s Thesis, Twente: University of Twente.
Kissane, B., Bradley, J., & Kemp, M. (1994). Graphics Calculators, Equity, and Assessment. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 8, 31-43.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the Development of Teacher Knowledge in a Design Seminar: Integrating Content, Pedagogy, and Technology. Computers & Education, 49, 740-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012
Kpanja, E. (2001). A Study of the Effects of Video Tape Recording in Microteaching Training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 483-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00215
Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional Development in Integrating Technology into Teaching and Learning: Known, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, 575-614. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309921
Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2008). Teachers’ Views on Factors Affecting Effective Integration of Information Technology in the Classroom: Developmental Scenery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16, 233-263.
Lim, C. P., Teo, Y. H., Wong, P., Khine, M. S., Chai, C. S., & Divaharan, S. (2003). Creating a Conducive Learning Environment for the Effective Integration of CT: Classroom Management Issues. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14, 405-423.
Linchevski, L., Kutscher, B., & Olivier, A. (1999). Assessment in Support of Equity. In Fifth Annual Congress of the South Africa Association for Mathematics Education Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 155-167). Port Elizabeth: Port Elizabeth Technikon.
Ma, L. (2010). Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers’ Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States (10th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856345
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature Sources and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Construct and Its Implications for Science Education (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4
Mallet, D. G. (2007). Multiple Representations for Systems of Linear Equations via the Computer Algebra System Maple. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 1, 16-31.
Marulcu, G., & Dedetürk, A. (2014). Preservice Science Teachers’ Practices of Micro-In- struction Method: An Action Research. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 11, 353-372.
Metaxas, N., & Karagiannidou, A. (2010). When Two Circles Determine a Triangle. Discovering and Proving a Geometrical Condition in a Computer Environment. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15, 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-009-9146-x
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing Teachers to Teach Science and Mathematics with Technology: Developing a Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
O’Callaghan, B. R. (1998). Computer-Intensive Algebra and Students’ Conceptual Knowledge of Functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 21-40. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.29.1.0021
Ozmantar, M. F., Akkoc, H., Bngolbali, E., Demir, S., & Ergene, B. (2010). Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Multiple Representations in Technology Rich Environments. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6, 19-36. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75224
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a Conceptual Tool to Understand Teachers as Professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
Peker, M. (2009). The Use of Expanded Microteaching for Reducing Preservice Teachers’ Teaching Anxiety about Mathematics. Scientific Research and Essay, 4, 872-880. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75284
Philipp, R. A., Ambrose, R., Lamb, L. L. C., Sowder, J. T., Schappelle, B. P., Sowder, L., & Chauvot, J. (2007). Effects of Early Field Experiences on the Mathematical Content Knowledge and Beliefs of Prospective Elementary School Teachers: An Experimental Study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 438-476.
Purcell, K., Heaps, A., Buchanan, J., & Friedrich, L. (2013). How Teachers Are Using Technology at Home and in Their Classrooms. Washington DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project.
Rasinen, A. (2003). An Analysis of the Technology Education Curriculum of Six Countries. Journal of Technology Education, 15, 31-47. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v15i1.a.3
Selden, A., Dubinsky, E., Harel, G., & Hitt, F. (2003) Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education V (Vol. 12). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
Stump, S. L. (2001). Developing Pre-Service Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Slope. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 207-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00071-2
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Computer-Assis- ted Learning, 29, 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
Wakwinji, J. (2011). Exploring How a Workshop Approach Helps Mathematics Teachers Start to Develop Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Master’s Thesis, Amsterdam: Faculty of Science Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Yerushalmy, M. (1991). Student Perceptions of Aspects of Algebraic Function Using Multiple Representation Software. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 42-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00223.x
Yetkin, E. (2003). Student Difficulties in Learning Elementary Mathematics. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.
Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G. W., & Dick, T. P. (2007). Research on Technology in Mathematics Education: A Perspective of Constructs. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 1169-1208). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.