Empowering Early Childhood Pre-Service Teachers with Tech Fluency
- 1 Education Department, Carlow University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- 2 Education Department, Carlow University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Abstract
Many early childhood pre-service teachers will bring some experience with technology into college which may include word processing, gaming, and social media. Some will have a knowledge of block or html programming.Working adult students often bring less experience. Technology in a 21 st century elementary classroom integrates technology tools intentionally and ethically. Teachers need to be able to adapt to new technologies and coding languages quickly. Teachers need to embrace the interdisciplinary nature of Science- Technology-Engineering-Mathematics (STEM). A complex myriad of tools and strategies exist. This can seem overwhelming and disconnected from the individual disciplinary goals in the classroom. Pre-service teacher preparation programs must empower pre-service teachers with technology fluency in order to respond to fluid and diverse challenges of the 21 st century classroom. This exploratory research project synthesizes pedagogy, international technology standards, peer groups, technology trainings, student evaluations, growth mindset theory, and common readers to reform a small liberal arts college’s approach to early childhood pre-service teacher preparation. The curriculum revision was guided by these questions: 1) How do our pre-service teachers relate to the present and future worlds of themselves and of their students? 2) How can pre-services programs empower early childhood teachers with tech fluency? The exploration involved undergraduate pre-service teachers over a 6-year period. The research resulted in a five-phase approach to educational technology that consists of Play, Learn, Create, Plan, and Share. Pre-service teachers explore technology tools, learn how they work, create innovative robots and projects from the tools, plan curricula that integrate those tools, and develop agency through sharing their thinking, curricula, and projects with the broader educational community. This approach can offer innovative systemic changes in education technology pedagogy.
- Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational Thinking: A Digital Age Skill for Everyone. International Society for Technology in Education, 38, 20-23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ918910
- Basu, S., Mustafaraj, E., & Rich, K. (2016). Computational Thinking. https://circlcenter.org/computational-thinking
- Bowen, G., Gordon, N., & Chojnacki, M. (2017). Advocacy through Social Media: Exploring Student Engagement in Addressing Social Issues. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 21, 5. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1156183
- Carnegie Mellon CREATE lab. (n.d.). http://www.cmucreatelab.org/
- Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., & Souberman, E. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. http://ouleft.org/wp-content/uploads/Vygotsky-Mind-in-Society.pdf
- Couros, G. (2015). The Innovator’s Mindset: Empower Learning, Unleash Talent, and Lead a Culture of Creativity. San Diego: Dave Burgess Consulting, Inc.
- Damhof, L., Kazemier, E., Gulmans, J., Cremers, P., Doornbos, A., & Beenen, P. (2020). Anticipation for Emergence: Defining, Designing and Refining Futures Literacy in Higher Education. In Humanistic Futures of Learning: Perspectives from UNESCO Chairs and UNITWIN Networks. Paris: Unesco.
- Duncker, K. (1945). On Problem Solving (L.S. Lees, Trans). Psychological Monographs, 58, i-113. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093599
- Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Singer, D. G. (2006). Why Play=Learning: A Challenge for Parents and Educators. In D. G. Singer, R. M. Golinkoff, & K. Hirsh-Pasek (Eds.), Play=Learning: How Play Motivates and Enhances Children’s Cognitive and Social-Emotional Growth (pp. 3-12). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304381.003.0001
- Greenspan, S., & Shanker, S. (2004). The First Idea: How Symbols, Language, and Intelligence Evolved Form our Primate Ancestors to Modern Humans. Cambridge, MA: Capo Press.
- Hirsh, R. (2004). Early Childhood Curriculum: Incorporating Multiple Intelligences, Developmentally Appropriate Practice, and Play. Boston, MA: Pearson.
- International Society for Technology (2020). ISTE Standards. https://www.iste.org/standards
- Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Angelia, C. (2017). Effect of Robotics on Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Science Learning, and Computational Thinking. Journal of Sci- ence Education and Technology, 26, 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9663-z