Teaching Techniques Implemented by Preschool Teachers in English Early Literacy Instructional Practices: A Case Study
- 1 Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
- 2 Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
Abstract
This multiple case study aims to address preschool teachers’ practices implemented in early literacy instruction specifically in terms of the teaching techniques used by teachers during English early literacy classroom instruction. Four in-service teachers from three types of preschool which are private, government and non-government organization s located in a suburban area, were selected as the study’s participants. Data collection s involved throughout the study w ere field notes, checklist, video recording and classroom observations. A teaching technique checklist is used as an instrument to analyze types of teaching techniques implemented by teachers. Results show that the preschool teachers only implement general teaching techniques and often do not implement specialist teaching techniques during English literacy instruction. The most common teaching techniques implemented by the teachers during English literacy instruction are: 1 ) demonstrating, 2 ) describing, 3 ) encouraging, praising, and helping, 4 ) facilitating, 5 ) listening, 6 ) positioning people, 7 ) questioning, 8 ) recalling, 9 ) singing and 10 ) telling and instructing. Generalization may not be fair at this stage, but the findings may reflect the need to provide appropriate training for preschool teachers. Larger samples are crucial to understand the scale of the teaching practice being appropriate or not for effective English language literacy instruction.
- Abdul Rahman, N. A., & Maarof, N. (2015). The Relationship between Language Strategies and Students’ Motivation in Learning English as a Second Language. Jurnal Teknikal Sosial Sains, 1, 1-18.
- Asmawi, A., & SeyedHendi, N. (2016). Preschool English Teachers’ Practices and Early Literacy Instruction: A Multiple Case Study. Asian Education Studies, 1, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.20849/aes.v1i2.72
- Asmawi, A., & SeyedHendi, N. (2018). Preschool English Teachers’ Practices and Early Literacy Instruction: Montessori vs International Preschool Curriculum. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6, 29-36.
- Baroody, A. E., & Diamond, K. E. (2016). Associations among Preschool Children’s Classroom Literacy Environment, Interest and Engagement in Literacy Activities, and Early Reading Skills. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 14, 146-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X14529280
- Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. London: Pearson Education.
- Dennis, L. R., & Horn, E. (2011). Strategies for Supporting Early Literacy Development. Young Exceptional Children, 14, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250611420553
- Fern, N. P., & Jiar, Y. K. (2014). Preschool Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices on Early Literacy Instruction. Sains Humanika, 2, 139-146.
- Fox, L. C. (2014). Effects of Technology on Literacy Skills and Motivation to Read and Write (p. 522). Education and Human Development Master’s Theses.
- Johnston, P., & Costello, P. (2005). Principles for Literacy Assessment. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 256-267. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.40.2.6
- Mac Naughton, G., & Williams, G. (2009). Teaching Young Children: Choices in Theory and Practice. New York: Open University Press.
- Majzub, R. M. (2013). Critical Issues in Preschool Education in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Education and Educational Technologies (pp. 150-155).
- Masnan, H., Josin, E. H., Zain, A., & Zainudin, N. A. S. (2018). Environmental Preschool Education Module Based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 1442-1449.
- Md. Yunus, M. M., Hashim, H., Ishak, N. M., & Mahamod, Z. (2010). Understanding TESL Pre-Service Teachers’ Teaching Experience and Challenges via Post-Practicum Reflection Forms. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 722-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.224