Teaching for Empowerment: Creative Use of Student-Generated Knowledge to Enrich Learning
- 1 School of Chinese, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Abstract
This paper will use the approaches and practices adopted by Dr. Aihe Wang, Honorary Associate Professor from School of Chinese at HKU, to illustrate how a student-generated knowledge project empowered students to grow into producers of knowledge by developing them as partners during the implementation process. This project provides an opportunity for students to co-construct an online database of oral history testimonies. To prepare, undertake, analyze, and document their oral history interviews, students need to be actively engaged in reading, researching, asking, discussing, interpreting and writing. At the final stage of the project, each student generates a one-page archive, and all participants co-construct an online oral history archive. Through this case study, I seek to demonstrate how this project enhances students’ critical thinking abilities and empowers students to be knowledge producers for a student-built oral history online archive. This study also attempts to address the active role of teachers in this learning process. Teachers should actively adjust teaching methodology based on students’ difficulties and provide support to help students develop deeper levels of thinking.
- Barnett, R. (2014). Conditions of Flexibility: Creating a More Responsive Higher Education System. York: Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/fp_conditions_of_flexibility_0.pdf
- Brew, A. (2006). Research and Teaching: Beyond the Divide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36502-5
- Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging Students as Partners in Teaching and Learning: A Guide for Faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.
- Higher Education Research Institute (HERI) (2009). The American College Teacher: National Norms for 2007-2008. http://www.heri.ucla.edu/PDFs/pubs/briefs/brief-pr030508-08faculty.pdf
- Kusumoto, Y. (2018). Enhancing Critical Thinking through Active Learning. Language Learning in Higher Education, 8, 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2018-0003
- Levy, P., & Petrulis, R. (2012). How Do First-Year University Students Experience Inquiry and Research, and What Are the Implications for the Practice of Inquiry-Based Learning? Studies in Higher Education, 37, 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.499166
- Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On Qualitative Differences in Learning: 1-Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
- Neary, M., & Winn, J. (2009). The Student as Producer: Reinventing the Student Experience in Higher Education. In L. Bell, H. Stevenson, & M. Neary (Eds.), The Future of Higher Education: Policy, Pedagogy and the Student Experience (pp. 192-210). London: Continuum.
- Pithers, R. T., & Soden, R. (2000). Critical Thinking in Education: A Review. Educational Research, 42, 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/001318800440579
- VanSledright, B. A. (2004). What Does It Mean to Teach Historically and How Do You Teach It? Social Education, 68, 230-233.
- Walker, S. E. (2003). Active Learning Strategies to Promote Critical Thinking. Journal of Athletic Training, 38, 263-267.