As the world is moving towards Industrial Revolution 4.0 (IR 4.0), the need to develop creative thinking is demonstrated in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) curriculum. Students are prepared to nurture the problem-solving skills which are vital in their future STEM career. As this field is needed globally, communication skills are as important as content knowledge. Generally known as lingua franca , acquiring English enables people to communicate globally, hence broadening their chance of having their career. Thus, developing critical thinking should be in line with developing the language skills especially for the English as second language (ESL) learners. This paper views the interdisciplinary learning and multiple learning approaches that could help student’s attainment in STEM and ESL. This paper proposes the collaboration among ESL and STEM teachers to conduct interdisciplinary learning experience by the application of student-centred learn ing approaches such as inquiry-based learning, project-based learning, blended learning and problem-based learning. The proposed learning approaches are the bridge to integrate ESL and STEM disciplines in interdisciplinary learning and it provides advantages for teachers and learners. Hence, it is accepted to promote and implement interdisciplinary learning in the current curriculum environment.
KeywordsESLSTEMInterdisciplinary LearningMultiple Learning ApproachesInquiry-Based LearningProject-Based LearningBlended Learning and Problem-Based Learning
Adas, D., & Bakir, A. (2013). Writing Difficulties and New Solutions: Blended Learning as an Approach to Improve Writing Abilities. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3, 254-266.
Aiedah, A. K., & Lee, K. C. (2012). Application of Project-Based Learning in Students’ Engagement in Malaysian Studies and English Language. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Education (JIRE), 2, 37-46.
Apple, M. T., Falout, J., & Hill, G. (2020). The Relationship between Future Career Self Images and English Achievement Test Scores of Japanese STEM Students. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63, 372-385. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2020.3029662
Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM Education in Secondary Science Contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1349
Athirah, N., Nasir, M., & Aziz, A. A. (2020). Implementing Student-Centered Collaborative Learning When Teaching Productive Skills in an ESL Primary Classroom. International Journal of Publication and Social Studies, 5, 44-54. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.135.2020.51.44.54
Baharin, N., & Kamarudin, N. (2018). STEM ASEAN Project to Promote 21st Century Teaching and Learning. Learning Science and Mathematics, No. 13, 98-114.
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What Is STEM? A Discussion about Conceptions of STEM in Education and Partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112, 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179-201. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002179
Delgado, S. J., Collazo Reyes, J. J., Gómez Dopazo, S. I., Rodríguez Díaz, E. A., & Torres Arroyo, K. M. (2019). Hispanic ESL Science Majors Need More Practice Using English for Scientific Purposes. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, in press. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192719852025
Deneme, S., & Ada, S. (2012). On Applying the Interdisciplinary Approach in Primary Schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 885-889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.217
Engelbret, C. J. (2015). The Confluence of STEM Education and Language Learning: Curriculum Integration to Benefit Language Learners. School of Education Student Capstone Theses and Dissertations, 250. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/250
Galvez, S. (2019). From Traditional to Practical: A Twist Using Inquiry Based Instruction in ESL Learning. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3488896
Glancy, A. W., & Moore, T. J. (2013). Theoretical Foundations for Effective STEM Learning Environments. School of Engineering Education Working Papers, Paper 1.
Hersulastuti, H., Setiyadi, D. P., & Riyadi, I. (2019). Implementing Creative Problem-Based Learning Model in English Classroom: Students and Teachers Voices. 8th UNNES International Conference on ELTLT, Indonesia: Universitas Negeri Semarang, October 2019, 81-89.
Ivanitskaya, L., Clark, D., Montgomery, G., & Primeau, R. (2002). Interdisciplinary Learning: Process and Outcomes. Innovative Higher Education, 27, 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021105309984
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Moore, T. J. (Eds.) (2015). STEM Road Map: A Framework for Integrated STEM Education. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753157
Jones, C. (2010). Interdisciplinary Approach—Advantages, Disadvantages, and the Future Benefits of Interdisciplinary Studies. ESSAI, 7, Article 26.
Kong, S. F., Effendi, M., & Matore, E. M. (2020). STEM Approaches in Teaching and Learning Process: Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 10, 29-44.
LaCosse, J., Canning, E. A., Bowman, N. A., Murphy, M. C., & Logel, C. (2020). A Social-Belonging Intervention Improves STEM Outcomes for Students Who Speak English as a Second Language. Science Advances, 6, eabb6543. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb6543
Lai, C. S. (2018). Using Inquiry-Based Strategies for Enhancing Students’ STEM Education Learning. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 4, 110-117
MacKinnon, G., Greene, K., Rawn, E., Cressey, J., & He, W. (2017). Employing STEM Curriculum in an ESL Classroom: A Chinese Case Study. K-12 STEM Education, 3, 143-155.
Ministry of Education (2016). Panduan Pelaksanaan Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM) Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.
Muniandy, J., & Shuib, M. (2016). Learning Styles, Language Learning Strategies and Fields of Study among ESL Learners. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 12, 1-19.
Othman, N., & Shah, M. I. A. (2013). Problem-Based Learning in the English Language Classroom. English Language Teaching, 6, 125-134. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n3p125
Pedaste, M., & Sarapuu, T. (2006). Developing an Effective Support System for Inquiry Learning in a Web-Based Environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00159.x
Quvanch, Z., & Na, K. S. (2020). A Review on Impact of Blended Learning on the English Writing Skills. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal (ITLJ), 4, 41-50.
Rowntree, D. (1981). A Dictionary of Education. Harper & Row Pub.
Sehlaoui, A. S. (2018). Teaching ESL and STEM Content through CALL: A Research-Based Interdisciplinary Critical Pedagogical Approach. Rowman & Littlefield.
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
Unin, N., & Bearing, P. (2016). Brainstorming as a Way to Approach Student-Centered Learning in the ESL Classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224, 605-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.450
Wicklein, R. C., & Schell, J. W. (1995). Case Studies of Multidisciplinary Approaches to Integrating Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education, 6, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v6i2.a.5