Relationship between School Autonomy and Students’ Academic Achievement in Government Secondary Schools in East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia
- 1 Department of Educational Planning and Management, College of Education and Behavioral Sciences, PhD Program in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia
- 2 Department of Educational Planning and Management, College of Education and Behavioral Sciences, Adama Science and Technology University, Adama, Ethiopia
- 3 Department of Adult Education and Community Development, College of Education and Behavioral Sciences, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia
- 4 Department of Educational Planning and Management, College of Education and Behavioral Sciences, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia
Abstract
In a number of countries, education systems are moving towards practices of school autonomy reform to increase learning outcomes. As a result of this reform, decision-making at the school level has become supreme, and the role of the school leader has gained in significance. The aim of school autonomy is to improve the efficiency of education quality by independence and flexibility in managing existing resources. Regardless of these trends, amazingly little is known about how schools use school autonomy in practice, and there were a lot of controversies regarding the relationship between school autonomy and students’ academic achievement. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to find out the practiced areas of school autonomy and to examine the magnitude of relationship between the areas of school autonomy and students’ academic achievement in government secondary schools in the study area by using a descriptive-correlational survey research designs with a quantitative approach. A total of 502 respondents (secondary school teachers n = 347, and zone and district education offices experts n = 155) were samples. The sample schools were selected by stratified random sampling and the respondents were selected by simple random sampling using RAND or RANDBETWEEN function on Microsoft Excel. Closed-ended questionnaires were employed for gathering data from the respondents. The correlation statistical test was used to describe and measure the degree of association (or relationship) between the variables or sets of scores. Moreover, t-test was also conducted to test the difference between the two groups. Analysis results demonstrate that there have been practices of the three areas of school autonomy in the schools, that is, personnel management autonomy, financial management autonomy and academic autonomy. Moreover, school autonomy practices in general and its three dimensions in particular have weak to moderate significant positive re lationships with students’ academic achievement. The overall conclusion dr awn from the results of this study was that granting autonomy to secondary s chools may be the best idea for the better performance of educational systems in the study area. Further, similar to many of the developed countries, practice of school autonomy in developing countries was also one of the means to improve students’ academic achievement.
- Abdulkadiroglu, A., Angrist, J. D., Dynarski, S. M., Kane, T. J., & Pathak, P. A. (2011). Accountability and Flexibility in Public Schools: Evidence from Boston’s Charters and Pilots. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 699-748. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr017
- Abebe, W. (2012). School Management and Decision Making in Ethiopian Government Schools: Evidence from the Young Lives Qualitative School Survey. Addis Ababa.
- Arcia, G., Patrinos, H., Porta, E., & Macdonald, K. (2011). SABER School Autonomy and Accountability Background Paper. Working Paper No. 94450, The World Bank.
- Barrera, F., Fasih, T., & Patrinos, H. (2009). Decentralized Decision Making in Schools. The Theory and Evidence on School-Based Management. The World Bank.
- Bloom, N., Lemos, R., Sadun, R., & Reenen, V. (2015). Does Management Matter in Schools? Economic Journal, 125, 647-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12267
- Brauckmann, S., & Schwarz, A. (2014). Autonomous Leadership and a Centralized School System: An Odd Couple? Empirical Insights from Cyprus. The International Journal of Educational Management, 28, 823-841. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2013-0124
- Caldwell, B. (2005). The Structure and Funding of the School System: Achieving an Optimal Balance of Centralization and Decentralization in Education. Australian Economic Review, 38, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8462.2005.00355.x
- Cheusheva, S. (2021). How to Select Random Sample in Excel. https://www.ablebits.com/office-addins-blog/2018/01/31/excel-random-selection-random-sample
- Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
- Di Gropello, E. (2004). Educational Decentralization and Accountability Structure in Latin American and the Caribbean Region. International Handbook of School Effectiveness and Improvement, 17, 503-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5747-2_28
- Di Gropello, E. (2006). A Comparative Analysis of School Based Management in Central America. World Bank Working Paper No. 72, The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6525-0
- Dobbie, W., & Fryer (2011). Getting Beneath the Veil of Effective Schools: Evidence from New York City. Working Paper 17632, National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17632
- Duflo, E., Dupas, M., & Kremer (2015). School Governance, Teacher Incentives, and Pupil-Teacher Ratios: Experimental Evidence from Kenyan Primary Schools. Journal of Public Economics, 123, 92-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.11.008