Does One More Time Verbalization’s Sequence Increases the Progression of Motor Learning — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Does One More Time Verbalization’s Sequence Increases the Progression of Motor Learning
Research Unit, Sportive Performance and Physical Rehabilitation, High Institute of Sports and Physical Education of Kef, University of Jendouba, Kef, Tunisia
,
Research Unit, Sportive Performance and Physical Rehabilitation, High Institute of Sports and Physical Education of Kef, University of Jendouba, Kef, Tunisia
,
Higher Institute of Sports and Physical Education, Ksar-Said, Tunisia
,
Research Unit, Sportive Performance and Physical Rehabilitation, High Institute of Sports and Physical Education of Kef, University of Jendouba, Kef, Tunisia
,
Research Unit, Sportive Performance and Physical Rehabilitation, High Institute of Sports and Physical Education of Kef, University of Jendouba, Kef, Tunisia
1 Research Unit, Sportive Performance and Physical Rehabilitation, High Institute of Sports and Physical Education of Kef, University of Jendouba, Kef, Tunisia
2 Research Unit, Sportive Performance and Physical Rehabilitation, High Institute of Sports and Physical Education of Kef, University of Jendouba, Kef, Tunisia
3 Higher Institute of Sports and Physical Education, Ksar-Said, Tunisia
4 Research Unit, Sportive Performance and Physical Rehabilitation, High Institute of Sports and Physical Education of Kef, University of Jendouba, Kef, Tunisia
5 Research Unit, Sportive Performance and Physical Rehabilitation, High Institute of Sports and Physical Education of Kef, University of Jendouba, Kef, Tunisia
This work studies the effect of the verbalization sequences constructed by the pupils during a cycle of eight basketball sessions in Physical Education and Sport (PES) on motor learning for a mixed class of Tunisian high school pupils. On the one hand, we compare the effects of pupil’s discursive productions after a first and a second sequence of verbalization. On the other hand, we consider the differences in the action projects between the language interactions of girls, boys and mixed groups. The observation is used as data collection instruments. The didactic interaction is studied by exercising the quantitative approach to identify hidden intentions. The measured parameters are: played balls, shots and scored baskets. The results of the experiments showed that the practice of learning in condition with verbalization brings positive effects in terms of behavioral modification. The addition of a second sequence of verbalization during the same session is more effective for the learning than the practice under condition of a single sequence application. We suggest to Tunisian PES teachers to give more time to verbalization, pupils learn better after identifying the mechanisms that lead to the success of their action projects and have a more pronounced rate of learning.
Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. J. (2000). Gesture and the Process of Speech Production: We Think, Therefore We Gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 593-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909600750040571
Altet, M. (1994). The Professional Development of Teachers: Analysis of Practices and Teaching Situations. University Press of France.
Amade-Escot, C. (1998). The Teacher of Physical Education and Sport in the Didactic Interactions: Research Itinerary. Doctoral Dissertation.
Austin, J. L., & Lane, G. (1970). When to Say, Is to Do.
Bastien, C. (1987). Schemes and Strategies in the Cognitive Activity of the Child. University Press of France.
Biao, I. (2013). The Place of Transformative Learning in the Building of Learning Cities in Africa. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 19, 3-16. https://doi.org/10.7227/JACE.19.1.2
Bouthier, D. (1988). Contribution of Psychology to the Problematic of Training of Collective Sports Actions. Doctoral Dissertation, PhD Thesis, EPHE, University Paris V. Paris, France.
Bronckart, J. P. (1997). Language Activity, Texts and Discourses. For Socio-Discursive Interactionism.
Bronckart, J. P. (2009). Learning and Development in the Perspective of Socio-Discursive Interactionism. eJRIEPS-e Journal de la Recherche sur lIntervention en éducation Physique et Sport, 18, 5-23.
Cadopi, M. (2005). The Dancers Motor Skills: A Cognitive Approach. Psychology Bulletin, 475, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3917/bupsy.475.0029
Chang, C. W. (2009). Language, Thinking and Action: Semio-Constructivist Approach to the Learning of Play in Basketball for the Pupil of CM2 (5th Grade). Doctoral Dissertation.
Chikoko, V. (2007). The School Cluster System as an Innovation: Perceptions of Zimbabwean Teachers and School Heads. Africa Education Review, 4, 42-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146620701412142
Cottinet, C., & Harmand, M. (2003). Verbalize to Learn, a Central Activity in EPS.
Darnis, F., & Lafont, L. (2008). Effects of the Dissymmetry of Competence for a Co-Operative Learning in Dyads in Physical and Sports Education. International Social Psychology Books, 79, 69-83. https://doi.org/10.3917/cips.079.0069
Darnis, F., & Lafont, L. (2013). Cooperative Learning and Dyad Interactions: Two Modes of Knowledge Construction in Socio-Constructivist Settings for Team-Sport Teaching. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 20, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2013.803528
Darnis-Paraboschi, F., Lafont, L., & Menaut, A. (2005). A Social-Constructivist Approach in Physical Education: Influence of Dyadic Interactions on Tactical Choices in an Instructional Team Sport Setting. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173506
Elandoulsi, S. (2006). Effects of Verbal Intercommunications between Pupils on Motor Learning: Example of Learning of the Handstand in Gymnastics. Staps, 74, 41-45. https://doi.org/10.3917/sta.074.0041
Fleurance, P. (1991). Place and Roles of Representations in Motor Learning. In J. P. Famose, P. Fleurance, & Y. Touchard (Eds.), Motor Learning. Role of Representations, (pp. 81-95). revue EPS.
Grehaigne, J. F. (1996). The Rules of Action: A Support for Learning. EPS Review, 265, 71-73.
Gréhaigne, J. F. (2009). Around the Time: Learning, Spaces, Projects in Collective Sports. Presses Univ. Franche-Comte.
Grehaigne, J. F., & Godbout, P. (1995). Tactical Knowledge in Team Sports from a Constructivist and Cognitivist Perspective. Quest, 47, 490-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1995.10484171
Grehaigne, J. F., Billard, M., Guillon, R., & Roche, J. (1989). Towards a Different Conception of the Teaching of Collective Sports. In Methodology and Didactics of Physical and Sports Education (pp. 155-172).
Keukelaere, C. D., Guérin, J., & Saury, J. (2008). Co-Construction of Knowledge in Physical Education during a Training Situation in Volley Ball. Staps: International Journal of Sport Science and Physical Education, 29, 23-38. https://doi.org/10.3917/sta.079.0023
Lafont, L., & Martin, L. (2014). Learning and Teaching in Physical Activities with an Artistic Dimension: Theoretical Considerations and Research Results. Staps, 103, 39-52. https://doi.org/10.3917/sta.103.0039
Nachon, M. (2004). Interactions in Physical Education and Sport: The Case of Basketball: An Approach to Semio-Language Skills and the Construction of Knowledge. Doctoral dissertation, University of Franche-Comté, UFR of Language, Human and Society Sciences.
Ouesslati, N., Mekni, R., Sahli, H., & Bouassida, A. (2015). Verbalization in Sport and Physical Education Study of Volleyball Teachers Conceptions. Creative Education, 6, 1603. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.614161
Sarrazy, B. (2001). Teacher-Student Interactions in Mathematics Education. Contribution to an Anthropo-Didactic Approach to Teaching Phenomena. French Review of Education, 136, 117-132. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfp.2001.2832
Wallian, N., & Chang, C. W. (2007a). Language, Thinking and Action: Towards a Semio-Constructivist Approach in Physical Education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 12, 289-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980701610219
Wallian, N., & Chang, C. W. (2007b). Semiotics of Motor Action and Language Activities: Towards an Epistemology of Knowledge Co-Constructed in Collective Sports. In J. F. Gréhaigne (Ed.), Configurations of the Game. Debate of Ideas and Learning of Football and Team Sports (pp. 145-164).
Zerai, Z., Rezig, M., & Zhigbi, M. (2008). Debates of Ideas and Learning among Girls in Collective Sport. e Journal of Research on Intervention in Physical and Sports Education, 13, 78-93.
Zghibi, M. (2009). Language Interactions of Students and Learning in Football: The Case of Four Classes of 9th Year Basic in Tunisia. Doctoral Dissertation.
Zghibi, M., Guinoubi, C., Bennour, N., & Moheiddine, N. (2013a). Debate of Ideas and Implementation of the Projects of Actions in Football Game: Cases of the Boys of Third Year Secondary in Tunisia. Sport Science Review, 22, 151-180. https://doi.org/10.2478/ssr-2013-0008
Zghibi, M., Sahli, H., Bennour, N., Guinoubi, C., Guerchi, M., & Hamdi, M. (2013b). The Pupils Discourse and Action Projects: The Case of Third Year High School Pupils in Tunisia. Creative Education, 4, 165. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.43024
Zghibi, M., Sahli, H., Jabri, M., Ouelhezi, S., Guelmemi, N., & Wallian, N. (2014). Modalities of Decision Making for Girls and Boys in the Presence or Absence of the Teacher. International Review of Education, 59, 751-769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-013-9397-6