The aims of this study were two-fold : first, to investigate the effect of a heterophonic homographic initial of a sentence (HP-HG) on the reading process of beginning Arabic readers as they read for comprehension; and second, to examine the role of the correct short vowels and diacritics in resolving garden-path (GP) ambiguity. Thirty-nine native monolingual Arab male fourth- grade students aged between 9 and 10, participated in reading 31 sentences representing three reading conditions, plain, vowelized-discretized, and wrongly vowelized, using a self-paced reading software program. The results showed that the GP structure of Arabic sentences did not affect the reading process of the beginning Arabic readers, nor was their process of reading such sentences significantly improved or shortened by the disambiguating short vowels and diacritics. However, examining the means descriptively shows that on average, the GP sentences took more time for the students to read but were comprehended better than their counterparts. Different proposed explanations were suggested, and a good-enough model is a good candidate to start with. One important factor that arose in all possible interpretations for the ineffectiveness of the GP structure on the reading comprehension process of Arab children (and adults) resides in the nature of Arabic morphology by supposedly maintaining the core root of the initial HP-HG words during GP sentence processing. Assessing the same phenomenon with different populations of low-skilled Arab children and learners of Arabic as a second language is recommended because they are both accustomed to reading a vowelized-diacritized script and their mastery of Arabic morphology is assumedly developing.
KeywordsGarden-Path StructureArabic Short VowelsGood-Enough ApproachHeterophonic HomographicComprehension
Abu-Rabia, S. (1995). Learning to Read in Arabic: Reading, Syntactic, Orthographic & Working Memory Skills in Normally Achieving and Poor Arabic Readers. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 16, 351-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/0270271950160401
Abu-Rabia, S. (1999). The Effect of Arabic Vowels on Reading Comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023291620997
Abu-Rabia, S. (2001). The Role of Vowels in Reading Semitic Scripts: Data from Arabic & Hebrew. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 39-59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008147606320
Abu-Rabia, S. (2012). The Role of Morphology and Short Vowelization in Reading Morphological Complex Words: Evidence for the Domination of the Morpheme/Root-Based Theory in Reading Arabic. Creative Education, 3, 486-494. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.34074
Abu-Rabia, S. (2019). The Role of Short Vowels in Reading Arabic: A Critical Literature Review. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48, 785-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09631-4
Abu-Rabia, S. (2021). The Impact of Diacritic Marking on Listening Comprehension Skills in Arabic Orthography. The Journal of Educational Research. 114, 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1872476
Abu-Rabia, S., & Abu-Rahmoun, N. (2012). The Role of Phonology and Morphology in the Development of Basic Reading Skills of Dyslexic and Normal Native Arabic Readers. Creative Education, 3, 1259-1268. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.37185
Al-Fahid, J. M. (2000). The Goodman Psycholinguistic Model of English Reading and Its Applicability to Semitic languages. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona.
Badry, F. (1982). The Centrality of Root in Semitic Lexical Derivation: Evidence from Children’s Acquisition of Moroccan Arabic (Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, No. 21. 9-15). Stanford University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 222046).
Benmamoun, E. (1999). Arabic Morphology: The Central Role of the Imperfective. Lingua, 108, 175-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00045-X
Boudelaa, S. (2014). Is the Arabic Mental Lexicon Morpheme-Based or Stem Based? Implications for Spoken and Written Word Recognition. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic Literacy: Insights and Perspectives (pp. 31-54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8545-7_2
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2005). Discontinuous Morphology in Time: Incremental Masked Priming in Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 207-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000106
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2015). Structure, Form, and Meaning in the Mental Lexicon: Evidence from Arabic. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 955-992. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1048258
Cole, P., Segui, J., & Taft, M. (1997). Words and Morphemes as Units for Lexical Access. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 312-330. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2523
El Akiki, C., & Content, A. (2020). Early Sensitivity to Morphology in Beginning Readers of Arabic. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article ID: 552315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552315
Fassi, A. (1993). Issues in the Structure of Arabic Clauses and Words (Vol. 29). Kluwer Academic Publishers
Ferreira, F., & Cokal, D. (2016). Sentence Processing. In G. Hickok, & S. L. Small (Eds.), Neurobiology of Language (pp. 265-274). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00022-5
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. (1998). Syntactic Reanalysis, Thematic Processing, and Sentence Comprehension. In J. D. Fodor, & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in Sentence Processing (pp. 73-100). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9070-9_3
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Use of Verb Information in Syntactic Parsing: Evidence from Eye Movements and Word-By-Word Self-Paced Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 555-568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.555
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1991). Recovery from Misanalyses of Garden-Path Sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 725-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90034-H
Ferreira, F., Christianson, K., & Hollingworth, A. (2001). Misinterpretations of Garden-Path Sentences: Implications for Models of Sentence Processing and Reanalysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005290706460
Ferreira, F., Engelhardt, P. E., & Jones, M. W. (2009). Good Enough Language Processing: A Satisficing Approach. In N. Taatgen, H. Rijn, J. Nerbonne, & L. Schomaker (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 413-418). Cognitive Science Society.
Fodor, J. D., & Ferreira, F. (1998). Reanalysis in Sentence Processing. Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9070-9
Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1994). The Diagnosis and Cure of Garden Paths. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 407-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143947
Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (2000). Garden Path Reanalysis: Attach (Anyway) and Revision as Last Resort? In M. de Vincenzi, & V. Lombardo (Eds.), Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Language Processing (pp. 21-61). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3949-6_2
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and Correcting Errors in Sentence Comprehension: Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally Ambiguous Sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
Hermena, E. W., Drieghe, D., Hellmuth, S., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015). Processing of Arabic Diacritical Marks: Phonological-Syntactic Disambiguation of Homographic Verbs and Visual Crowding Effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 494-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000032
Hermena, E., & Reichle, E. (2020). Insights from the Study of Arabic Reading. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12400
Ibrahim, R. (2013). Reading in Arabic: New Evidence for the Role of Vowels Diacritics. Creative Education, 4, 248-253. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.44036
Lin, C.-J., & Bever, T. (2011). Garden Path and the Comprehension of Head-Final Relative Clauses. In H. Yamashita et al. (Eds.), Processing and Producing Head-Final Structures, Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics (Vol. 38, pp. 277-297). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9213-7_13
MacDonald, M., & Hsiao, Y. (2018) Sentence Comprehension (Chp 8). In S.-A. Rueschemeyer, & M. G. Gaskell (Eds.), The Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 171-196). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786825.013.8
Mahfoudhi, A. (2007). Roots and Patterns in Arabic Lexical Processing. In E. Benmamoun (Ed.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XIX (pp. 123-150). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.289.11mah
Mahfoudhi, A., Elbeheri, G., Al-Rashidi, M., & Everatt, J. (2010). The Role of Morphological Awareness in Reading Comprehension among Typical and Learning Disabled Native Arabic Speakers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 500-514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355478
Mahmoud, Y. (1979). The Arabic Writing System and the Sociolinguistics of Orthographic Reform. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Georgetown University.
Mason, R., Just, M., Keller, T., & Carpenter, P. (2003). Ambiguity in the Brain: What Brain Imaging Reveals About the Processing of Syntactically Ambiguous Sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1319-1338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1319
Mazuka, R., & Itoh, K. (1995). Can Japanese Speakers Be Led down the Garden Path? In R. Mazuka, & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese Sentence Processing (pp. 295-329). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mazuka, R., Itoh, K., & Kondo, T. (1997). Processing down the Garden Path in Japanese: Processing of Sentences with Lexical Homonyms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025013716381
McCarthy, J. (1979). Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
McCarthy, J. (1981). A Prosodic Theory of Nonconcatenative Morphology. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 373-418.
Mitchell, D. C. (1994). Sentence parsing. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 375-409). Academic Press.
Mohammed, M. (2000). Word Order, Agreement in Arabic. John Benjamins B.V.
Roman, G., Pavard, B., & Asselah, B. (1985). Traitement perceptif des phrases ambigües en Arabe [Perceptive analysis of ambiguous Arabic sentences]. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 5, 5-22.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2017). Learning to Read Arabic. In L. Verhoeven, & C. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems (pp. 104-126). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316155752.006
Seraye, A. M. (2004). The Role of Short Vowels and Context in the Reading of Arabic, Comprehension, and Word Recognition of Highly Skilled Reader. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/9821/
Seraye, A. M. (2016). Short Vowels versus Word Familiarity in the Reading Comprehension of Arab Readers: A Revisited Issue. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8, 481-506.
Shormani, M. M. (2015). Is Standard Arabic a VSO Language? Evidence from Syntax and Semantics. Al-Qalam Journal, 3, 1-49. https://doi.org/10.35695/1946-000-003-012
Swets, B., Desmet, T., Clifton, C., & Ferreira, F. (2008). Underspecification of Syntactic Ambiguities: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading. Memory & Cognition, 36, 201-216. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.1.201
Taft, M. (1981a). Lexical Access via an Orthography Code: The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90544-9
Taft, M. (1981b). Prefix Stripping Revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90439-4
Taha, H. (2016). Deep and Shallow in Arabic Orthography: New Evidence from Reading Performance of Elementary School Native Arab Readers. Writing Systems Research, 8, 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1114910
Taha, H., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2016). The Role of Phonological versus Morphological Skills in the Development of Arabic Spelling: An Intervention Study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45, 507-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9362-6
Taha, H., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2017). Morphology and Spelling in Arabic: Development and Interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9425-3
Watson, J. (2000). Word Order in Arabic [Book Review]. Journal of Semitic Studies, 45, 389-391.
Wattad, H., & Abu-Rabia, S. (2020). The Advantage of Morphological Awareness among Normal and Dyslexic Native Arabic Readers: A Literature Review. Reading Psychology, 41, 130-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2020.1768973
Wonnacott, E., Joseph, H., Adelman, J., & Nation, K. (2016). Is Children’s Reading ‘Good Enough’? Links between Online Processing and Comprehension as Children Read Syntactically Ambiguous Sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 855-879. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1011176