Determining the Difficulty and Discrimination Parameters of a Mathematics Performance-Based Assessment
- 1 Department of Educational Studies, Wesley College of Education, Kumasi, Ghana
- 2 Darden College of Education & Professional Studies, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
Abstract
Performance-based assessment (PBA) is different from traditional testing methods in that PBA presents real-life problems for students to solve by integrating critical thinking with their content knowledge and skills. Implementing PBA regularly in mathematics classes is associated with improved student achievement and motivation to learn; however, there are concerns about the general lack of psychometric data to support the use of performance assessments. To address such concerns, this study applied item response theory to estimate the difficulty and discrimination indices of items that comprised a newly developed mathematics PBA. Data were collected by administering the PBA to 750 senior high school students in the Western Region of Ghana. The results indicated that the difficulty and discrimination levels of each item were satisfactory, which suggests that well-designed and properly vetted math PBA items would improve classroom assessments as well as high-stakes tests administered on a large scale. Additional recommendations are included at the end of this paper.
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association.
- Arhin, A. K. (2015). The Effect of Performance Assessment-Driven Instruction on the Attitude and Achievement of Senior High School Students in Mathematics in Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 6, 109-116. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1083838.pdf
- Bahr, D. L. (2007). Creating Mathematics Performance Assessments that Address Multiple Student Levels. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 63, 33-40. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2352&context=facpub
- Baker, E. L. (2019). Foreword. In D. G. Wren, & C. R. Gareis (Ed.), Assessing Deeper Learning: Developing, Implementing, and Scoring Performance Tasks (pp. vii-ix). Rowman Littlefield.
- Baker, F. B. (2001). The Basics of Item Response Theory (2nd ed.). ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
- Balik, I. W. (2012). Pengaruh Implementasi Asesmen Autentik Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika dan Motivasi Berprestasi (Eksperimen pada Peserta Didik Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Gianyar). [The Effect of Authentic Assessment Implementation on Mathematics Learning Achievement and Achievement Motivation (Experiments on Class VIII Students of SMP Negeri 3 Gianyar)]. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 2, 1-26. https://ejournal-pasca.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_ep/article/view/380
- Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2010). Beyond Basic Skills: The Role of Performance Assessment in Achieving 21st Century Standards of Learning. Stanford University, Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/library/publications/1462
- Davey, T., Ferrara, S., Shavelson, R., Holland, P., Webb, N., & Wise, L. (2015). Psychometric Considerations for the Next Generation of Performance Assessment. Center for K-12 Assessment & Performance Management, Educational Testing Service. https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/psychometric_considerations_white_paper.pdf
- DiCerbo, K. E., Shute, V., & Kim, Y. (2016). The Future of Assessment in Technology-Rich Environments: Psychometric Considerations. In J. M. Spector, B. Lockee, & M. Childress (Eds.), Learning, Design, and Technology: An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy (pp. 1-21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_66-1