Comparison of Knowledge Retention after the Use of a Virtual Patient versus a High-Fidelity Physical Simulator and Traditional Training
- 1 Medical Simulation Training Center at Research Institute of Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- 2 Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- 3 Medical Simulation Training Center at Research Institute of Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- 4 Medical Simulation Training Center at Research Institute of Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- 5 Clinic of Pediatrics, St George University Hospital, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- 6 Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- 7 Department of Midwifery Care, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- 8 Department of Pathophysiology, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- 9 Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Abstract
Aim: This research assesses the effect of a virtual patient simulation platform CyberPatient (CP) compared to a high-fidelity physical simulator SimJunior (SJ) and traditional bedside training (TBT) on knowledge retention and competencies in a health education environment. Material: A total of 143 fifth- year medical students were randomly assigned to three groups: TBT-Group (n = 55) received traditional education; CP-Group (n = 44) was trained with a virtual patient platform CyberPatient; and SJ-Group (n = 44) was trained using a high-fidelity simulator SimJunior. Educational content for all groups included competencies on pediatric asthma. Methods: Students’ level of knowledge acquisition was measured with a multiple-choice question test (MCQ) administered before the application of educational methods (Assessment I), immediately after completion of pediatric asthma training (Assessment II), and knowledge retention was measured two months later the completion of training (Assessment III). At the end of the study, student satisfaction was also measured by a survey questionnaire containing 5 questions rated on a Likert scale. Results: Assessment of acquired knowledge immediately after completion of pediatric asthma training revealed a significant difference between TBT-Group and SJ-Group ( p < 0.05) only. However, the knowledge retention score was significantly ( p < 0.05) higher for the CP-Group (91.89 ± 17.67) and SJ-Group (90.14 ± 19.48) in comparison to TBT-Group with traditional education (82.63 ± 26.22). Conclusions: Virtual training with CyberPatient and high-fidelity physical simulation had a significant ( p < 0.05) positive impact on memory retention compared to traditional clinical teaching. The possible mechanisms behind this positive impact include hands-on, active engagement, multi-sensory experience, spaced repetition, transfer of learning, and motivation. The inclusion of virtual simulation in the medical curriculum can improve the training of clinical competencies.
- Cook, D. A., Hamstra, S. J., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J. H., Wang, A. T., Erwin, P. J., & Hatala, R. (2013). Comparative Effectiveness of Instructional Design Features in Simulation-Based Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medical Teacher, 35, e867-e898. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.714886
- Custers, E. J. (2010). Long-Term Retention of Basic Science Knowledge: A Review Study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9101-y
- Derek Bok Center, Harvard University (n.d.). How Memory Works. https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/how-memory-works
- Diekelmann, S., & Born, J. (2010). The Memory Function of Sleep. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 114-126. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2762
- Farahmand, S. (2022). CyberPatient?—An Innovative Approach to Medical Education. Diss., University of British Columbia.
- Hamann, S. (2001). Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Emotional Memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 394-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01707-1
- Kurihara, Y., Kuramoto, S., Matsuura, K., Miki, Y., Oda, K., Seo, H., Watabe, T., & Qayumi, A. K. (2004). Academic Performance and Comparative Effectiveness of Computer- and Textbook-Based Self-Instruction. In MEDINFO 2004 (pp. 894-897). IOS Press.
- LeDoux, J. E. (1994). Emotion, Memory and the Brain. Scientific American, 270, 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0694-50
- Lissauer, T., & Carroll, W. (Eds.). (2021). Illustrated Textbook of Paediatrics E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
- McCrudden, M. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). Cognition in Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315389080
- Merrill, J. T., Jentsch, F. J., & Landers, M. C. (2015). The Use of Simulation in Aviation Training: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 25, 1-20.
- Miller, G. A. (1956). The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
- Mukharyamova, L., Kuznetsov, M., Izmailov, A., Koshpaeva, E., Stumborg, S., & Qayumi, K. (2020). Kazan State Medical University Survey after the Use of CyberPatientTM during COVID-19. Creative Education, 11, 2153-2175. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.1110156