An Approach to Enhancing Continuous Evaluation through Self-Reflection among Students of the Foundation Program in Design Course
- 1 Department of Textile Design, National Institute of Fashion Technology, Navi Mumbai, India
Abstract
Continuous evaluation and self-reflection are essential components of design education, promoting critical thinking, creativity, and self-directed learning. An engaging self-assessment is a significant process for cultivating innovative projects. It allows students to evaluate multiple stages in order to improve their comprehension and recognize the scope of improvement. An established approach is the use of design journals or sketchbooks, where students can document their design process, thoughts, and ideas. These journals function as a tool for self-reflection, allowing students to track their progress, identify the scope of improvement, and articulate their design decisions. The evaluation process also incorporates peer feedback and critique sessions, offering students a range of perspectives and insights into their work. This paper explores an approach to enhancing continuous evaluation through self-reflection among students of the Foundation Program in Design Course. The study focuses on how self-reflection can improve students’ understanding of their design processes, prepare them for improvement, and ultimately enhance their overall learning experience. The researcher conducted a systematic exploration with foundation year students from different batches and similar assignments to inculcate self-reflection as a valuable tool. This paper discusses the digital real-time feedback approach to facilitate self-reflection with specific criteria. It encourages students to consider their design decisions and iterate on their work in a focused manner. By integrating self-reflection into the continuous evaluation process, this approach aims to encourage students to share responsibility for learning. The objective is to familiarize students with the notion of self-evaluation as an initial informal experience prior to engaging in formal assessment at the foundation level.
- Baskin, M. (2010). Evaluating Creative Work. WARC Best Practice .
- Beattie, D. K. (1997). Assessment in Art Education. Assessment in the Visual Arts .
- Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a Broader Conception of Creativity: A Case for Mini-C Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and Arts , 1, 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.73
- Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the St u dent Does . McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
- Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for Mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1, 1-12.
- Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Business.
- Cambridge (2020). Developing the Cambridge Learners Attribute . Cambridge International. https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/support-and-training-for-schools/teaching-cambridge-at-your-school/cambridge-learner-attributes/
- Cross, N. (2007). Designerly Ways of Knowing . Springer Science & Business Media.
- Delerov, M. (2002). An Approach to Verification and Evaluation of Early Conceptual Design Solutions. In 7th International Design Conference Design (pp. 125-130). Dubrovnik.
- Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success . Random House.
- Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Engage the World, Change the World. In M. F. McEachen (Ed.), Deep Learning . Corwin, a Sage Company.
- Goldschmidt, G., & Tatsa, D. (2005). How Good Are Good Ideas? Correlates of Design Creativity. Design Studies, 26, 593-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.02.004
- John, H. (2016). The Components of the “Crit” in Art and Design Education. Irish Jou r nal of Academic Practice, 5 , Article No. 7.
- Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2019). Effects of Continuous Assessment on Students’ Learning Motivation and Achievement in Design Education. Sustainability, 11, Article No. 1155.
- Smith, S. V., & Brown, S. (2019). PhD by Published Work: Is It Time to Clarify and Tig h ten-Up the Ground Rules ? Association of National Teaching Fellows.
- Topping, K. (1998). Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities. R e view of Educational Research, 68, 249-276. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=623974 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249