Empowering Science Teachers through Computational Thinking
- 1 The Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science (DIMACS), Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA
- 2 The Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science (DIMACS), Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA
Abstract
Teachers are often positioned as targets or agents of reform in professional development ( Sykes & Wilson, 2016 ). This paper discusses empowering high school teachers through professional development opportunities around computational thinking where the goal of integrating computational thinking (CT) into existing practice shifts attention away from a particular instructional approach to providing teachers with the opportunity to fold adapted CT materials into their existing practice, thus teachers become agents. From the participants’ perspective, DIMACS Computational Thinking Professional Development for Mathematics and Science Teachers (CTPD achieved its primary goals of expanding teachers’ abilities to think computationally, especially in terms of decomposing and testing out various solutions; and they gained familiarity with a wide range of activities and units that they could adapt for use in their classrooms ( Wilson et al., 2023 ). A number of examples of science teachers, who have invented their own additions of CT to their courses are provided, including one from a third grade teacher.
- Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational Thinking: A Digital Age. Learning & Leading with Technology , 20-23.
- Bower, M., Wood, L. N., Lai, J. W., Howe, C., Lister, R., Mason, R., Highfield, K., & Veal, J. (2017). Improving the Computational Thinking Pedagogical Capabilities of School Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42 , Article 4. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n3.4
- Caskurlu, S., Yadav, A., Dunbar, K., & Santo, R. (2021). Professional Development as a Bridge between Teacher Competencies and Computational Thinking Integration. In A. Yadav & U. D. Berthelsen (Eds.), Computational Thinking in Education: A Pedagogical Perspective (pp. 136-150). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003102991-8
- COMAP (Consortium for Mathematics and Its Applications) (2024a). PS-Future. https://www.comap.com/resources/free-resources/mathematical-and-computational-methods-for-planning-a-sustainable-future-ps-future
- COMAP (Consortium for Mathematics and Its Applications) (2024b). VCTAL. https://www.comap.com/resources/free-resources/the-value-of-computational-thinking-across-grade-levels-9-12-vctal
- Di Sessa, A. A. (2018). Computational Literacy and “the Big Picture” Concerning Computers in Mathematics Education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20, 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1403544
- DIMACS (2020). Computational Thinking Skills Help HS Seniors Develop Nanotechnology. https://ctpdonline.org/2020/12/11/computational-thinking-skills-help-hs-seniors-develop-nanotechnologies/
- Furt, T., Greenwald, S., Carrady, M., Krakowski, A., Brodsky, L., Cours, M., Montgomery, R., & Corph, R. (2023). The Computational Thinking for Science (CT-S) Framework: Operationalizing CT-S for K-12 Science Education Researchers and Educators. International Journal of STEM Education , 10, Article No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00391-7
- Hou, H. Y., Agrawal, S., & Lee, C. F. (2020). Computational Thinking Training with Technology for Non-Information Undergraduates. Thinking Skills and Creativity , 38 , Article ID: 100720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100720
- International Society for Teaching Education (ISTE), & Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA) (2011). Operational Definition of Computational Thinking fo r K‒12 Education. https://cdn.iste.org/www-root/Computational_Thinking_Operational_Definition_ISTE.pdf
- NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. The National Academies Press.