Team-Based Learning and Threshold Concepts in Biological Security and Dual-Use: Toward a Transformative Biological Security Pedagogy—The Game Changing Implications of CRISPR/Cas and the Design of a Novel Methodology for Influencing the Culture of Life and Associated Science through Awareness Raising and Education — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Team-Based Learning and Threshold Concepts in Biological Security and Dual-Use: Toward a Transformative Biological Security Pedagogy—The Game Changing Implications of CRISPR/Cas and the Design of a Novel Methodology for Influencing the Culture of Life and Associated Science through Awareness Raising and Education
Division of Peace Studies and International Development, Faculty of Management, Law and Social Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
,
Division of Peace Studies and International Development, Faculty of Management, Law and Social Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
,
Office of the Vice Chancellor, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
,
School of Pharmacy and Medical Science, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
1 Division of Peace Studies and International Development, Faculty of Management, Law and Social Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
2 Division of Peace Studies and International Development, Faculty of Management, Law and Social Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
3 Office of the Vice Chancellor, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
4 School of Pharmacy and Medical Science, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) gene editing technologies appear to be a game-changer and suggest great potential for genome manipulation and for developments in next-generation therapeutics. Ethical, legal and social concerns have been raised in light of recent applications in humans. Concern also arises in relation to the potential of such developments for misuse. In addressing the post-COVID19 challenges raised by responsible research innovation and in confronting what to do about the vexed question of “dual-use”, we contend that awareness-raising and education concerning the ethical, legal and social implications of scientific research innovation represents a welcome and empowering alternative to top down regulatory responses that may serve to stifle innovation. The design and subsequent implementation of a novel transformative pedagogy combining Team-Based Learning and Threshold Concepts yields both empirical evidence-based metrics for real-time learning. As well as generating novel empirical data-sets for the identification of subject-specific threshold concepts across discrete specialisms in the life sciences, we argue that this hybrid methodology can be used to engage science professionals and students alike in meaningful and much-needed dialogue about developments relating to genome manipulation. We demonstrate how evidence-based threshold concepts can inform the design of bespoke subject-specific training as we suggest was the case from our deployment of team-based learning and threshold concepts during our proof of concept application, prior to the pandemic, during the course of two European Union Human Brain Project training programmes undertaken in 2017 and 2018, with experts in neuroscience research at the Karonlinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
KeywordsCRISPRGene EditingEthicalLegalSocialResponsible Research InnovationDual-UsePedagogyNeuroscienceTeam-Based Learning
Barradell, S. (2013). The Identification of Threshold Concepts: A Review of Theoretical Complexities and Methodological Challenges. Higher Education, 65, 265-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9542-3
BWC (Biological Weapons Convention) (2012). Seventh Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction (p. 11). United Nations. https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g12/600/60/pdf/g1260060.pdf
Cello, J., Paul, A. V., & Wimmer, E. (2002). Chemical Synthesis of Poliovirus cDNA: Generation of Infectious Virus in the Absence of Natural Template. Science, 297, 1016-1018. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072266
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2019). Reconstruction of the 1918 Influenza Pandemic Virus. https://archive.cdc.gov/#/details?url= https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/qa/1918flupandemic.htm
Cooper, P. A. (1993). Paradigm Shifts in Designed Instruction: From Behaviorism to Cognitivism to Constructivism. Educational Technology, 33, 12-19.
Cyranoski, D., & Ledford, H. (2018). Genome-Edited Baby Claim Provokes International Outcry: The Startling Announcement by a Chinese Scientist Represents a Controversial Leap in the Use of Genome Editing. Nature, 563, 607-608. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-07545-0
Dando, M., & Rappert, B. (2005). Codes of Conduct for the Life Sciences: Some Insights from UK Academia . Briefing Paper No. 16 (Second Series), University of Bradford.
Doudna, J. A., & Sternberg, S. H. (2017). A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Un-thinkable Power to Control Evolution . Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Forge, J. (2013). Responsible Dual Use. In B. Rappert, & M. J. Selgelid (Eds.), On the Dual Uses of Science and Ethics: Principles, Practices, and Prospects (pp. 121-132). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/duse.12.2013.08
Higher Education Academy Paper (HEA) (2017). Transforming Teaching Inspiring Learning: Reflecting on Threshold Concepts: And Introductory Tool . https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/reflecting-threshold-concepts-introductory-tool
Hrynchak, P., & Batty, H. (2012). The Educational Theory Basis of Team-Based Learning. Medical Teacher, 34, 796-801. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2012.687120
Interacademy Partnership (IAP) (2016). Doing Global Science: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise . Princeton University Press.
Threshold Concepts
Jackson, R. J., Ramsay, A. J., Christensen, C. D., Beaton, S., Hall, D. F., & Ramshaw, I. A. (2001). Expression of Mouse Interleukin-4 by a Recombinant Ectromelia Virus Suppresses Cytolytic Lymphocyte Responses and Overcomes Genetic Resistance to Mousepox. Journal of Virology, 75, 1205-1210. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.75.3.1205-1210.2001
Kang, X. J., Caparas, C. I. N., Soh, B. S., & Fan, Y. (2017). Addressing Challenges in the Clinical Applications Associated with CRISPR/Cas9 Technology and Ethical Questions to Prevent Its Misuse. Protein & Cell, 8, 791-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-017-0477-4
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge: Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practising’ in Improving Student Learning — Ten Years On . OCSLD.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (2): Epistemological Considerations and a Conceptual Framework for Teaching and Learning. Higher Education, 49, 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5
Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2018). Threshold Concepts: Undergraduate Teaching, Postgraduate Training, Professional Development and School Education: A Short Introduction and a Bibliography f r om 2003 to 2018 . http://www.ee.ucl.ac.uk/~mflanaga/thresholds.html
National Research Council (2004). (US) Committee on Research Standards and Practices to Prevent the Destructive Application of Biotechnology .
Nixdorff, K., Borisova, T., Komisarenko, S., & Dando, M. (2018). Dual-Use Nano-Neurotechnology: An Assessment of the Implications of Trends in Science and Technology. Politics and the Life Sciences, 37, 180-202. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2018.15
Normile, D. (2018). Organizers of Gene-Editing Meeting Blast Chinese Study but Call for “Pathway” to Human Trials. Science, November 29.
Novossiolova, T., Whitman, J., & Dando, M. (2018). Altering an Appreciative System: Lessons from Incorporating Dual-Use Concerns into the Responsible Science Education of Biotechnologists. Futures, 108, 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.02.001
Pearson, G. S. (1993). Prospects for Chemical and Biological Arms Control: The Web of Deterrence. The Washington Quarterly, 16, 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01636609309443401
Reeves, R. G., Voeneky, S., Caetano-Anollés, D., Beck, F., & Boëte, C. (2018). Agricultural Research, or a New Bioweapon System? Science, 362, 35-37. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat7664
Sataline, S., & Sample, I. (2018). Chinese Scientist Faces Wrath of His Peers over Editing of Babies DNA. The Guardian, 29th November, p. 4.
Selgelid, M. J. (2016). Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 923-964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9810-1
Shinners-Kennedy, D. (2016). How Not to Identify Threshold Concepts. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & M. T. Flanagan (Eds.), Threshold Concepts in Practice: Educational Futures: Rethinking Theory and Practice (pp. 253-267, Volume 68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-512-8_19
Shinners-Kennedy, D., & Fincher, S. A. (2013). Identifying Threshold Concepts: From Dead End to a New Direction. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 9-18). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493394.2493396
Sweet, M. (2011). Team-Based Learning in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Group Work that Works to Generate Critical Thinking and Engagement (pp. 6-7). Stylus Publishing.
Walther, G. (2013). Visions beyond Control: The Role of Art in Exploring Dual-Use Bioethics Education for Scientists. Creative Education, 4, 35-41. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.412a2006