The significance of digital technology and personalization in educating digitally underrepresented students is nowadays paramount. Various documents from developed countries, with the aim of transforming teaching and learning practices in underdeveloped nations mentioned the importance of conforming education in underdeveloped countries with the one in developed countries. The purpose of this study was to find out the importance of culturally relevant teaching (CRT) and personalized learning in underdeveloped countries in this digital age, to contribute towards achieving quality education in underdeveloped communities worldwide, and to preconize effective teaching and learning of concepts. Research published on these specific topics indicated that digital technology associated with CRT and personalized learning positively impacts the lives of digitally underrepresented communities. Teaching strategies such as Adaptive Learning Technologies (ALT) and Universal Design Learning (UDL) enhance teaching and learning in digitally marginalized communities and equip technologically marginalized students with the necessary skills to thrive in the digital age. The importance of adapting the curriculum and instruction of school systems to these unique educational environments, considering the importance of culture, individualized teaching and learning emphasizing digital era application has been found indispensable. The result of this work may inform and encourage educators, policy makers and Government officials about instructional strategies to implement in the classroom to meet the learning needs of every student. This calls for adopting personalized learning and culturally responsive teaching practices for the overall performance of all students. Recommendations are included.
KeywordsCultureTeaching and LearningCurriculumThe Digital AgeStudent-Centered ApproachesInnovative Methods
Anderson, K. A., & Sadler, C. I. (2009). The Effects of School-Based Curricula on Reading Achievement of African American Males in Special Education. The Journal of Negro Education, 78, 333-346.
Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2015). The Theory and Practice of Culturally Relevant Education: A Synthesis of Research across Content Areas. Review of Educational Research, 86, 163-206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066
Au, K. H. (2011). Literacy Achievement and Diversity: Keys to Success for Students, Teachers, and Schools. Teachers College Press.
August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.) (2006). Developing Literacy in Second Language Learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language Minority Children and Youth. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bartholomew, S. R., & Reeve, E. (2018). Middle School Student Perceptions and Actual Use of Mobile Devices: Highlighting Disconnects in Student Planned and Actual Usage of Mobile Devices in Class. Educational Technology & Society, 21, 48-58.
Bui, Y. N., & Fagan, Y. M. (2013). The Effects of an Integrated Reading Comprehension Strategy: A Culturally Responsive Teaching Approach for Fifth-Grade Students’ Reading Comprehension. Preventing School Failure, 57, 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2012.664581
Byrd, C. M. (2016). Does Culturally Relevant Teaching Work? An Examination from Student Perspectives. Sage Open, 6 . https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1198295
CDC (2019). School Connectedness. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/protective/school_connectedness.htm
Christianakis, M. (2011). Hybrid Texts: Fifth Graders, Rap Music, and Writing. Urban Education, 46, 1131-1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911400326
Department of Education (2014). Personalized Learning Working Definition Fall 2014. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1311874-personalized-learning-working-definition-fall2014/
Department of Education (2017). Future Ready Learning Working : Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2015/12/NETP16.pdf
Ensign, J. (2003). Including Culturally Relevant Math in an Urban School. Educational Studies: Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 34, 414-423.
eSchool News (2024, January 3). Learning in the Digital Age. eSchool News. https://www.eschoolnews.com/digital-learning/2024/01/03/learning-in-the-digital-age
Fox, K. (2022, February 3). Building a Student-Centered Approach to Digital Learning. Tyton Partners. https://tytonpartners.com/building-a-student-centered-approach-to-digital-learning/
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally Responsive Teaching : Theory, Research , and Practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Ginting, D. et al. (2024). Student-Centered Learning in the Digital Age: In-Class Adaptive Instruction and Best Practices. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379038193_student-centered%20learning%20in%20the%20digital%20age%20in-class%20Adaptive%20Instruction%20and%20Best%20Prectices
Hammond, Z. (2015). Culturally Responsible Teaching & the Brain. Promoting Authentic Engagement and Rigor Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students. A Sage Company.
Johnson, R. (2023, July 18). Adaptive Learning: Personalized Education in the Digital Age. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/adaptive-learning-personalized-education-in-the-digital-age
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But That's Just Good Teaching! the Case for Culturally Relevant Pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34, 159-165.
Mackay, H., & Strickland, M. J. (2018). Exploring Culturally Responsive Teaching and Student-Created Videos in an At-Risk Middle School Classroom. Middle Grades Review, 4 . https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1175683
McIntyre, E., & Hulan, N. (2013). Research-based, Culturally Responsive Reading Practice in Elementary Classrooms: A Yearlong Study. Literacy Research and Instruction, 52, 28-51.
Palfrey, J., & Glasser, U. (2008). Born Digital : Understanding the First Generation of Digi tal Natives . Basic Books.
Perry, K. (2012). What Is Literacy? A Critical Overview of Sociocultural Perspectives. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 8, 50-71.
Piazza, S. V., Rao, S., & Protacio, M. S. (2015). Converging Recommendations for Culturally Responsive Literacy Practices: Students with Learning Disabilities, English Language Learners, and Socioculturally Diverse Learners. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 17, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v17i3.1023
Rivas-Drake, D., Seaton, E. K., Markstrom, C., Quintana, S., Syed, M., Lee, R. M., Schwartz, S. J., Umaña-Taylor, A. J., French, S., & Yip, T. (2014). Ethnic and Racial Identity in Adolescence: Implications for Psychosocial, Academic, and Health Outcomes. Child Development, 85 , 40-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12200
Rodriguez, J. L., Jones, E. B., Pang, V. O., & Park, C. D. (2004). Promoting Academic Achievement and Identity Development among Diverse High School Students. High School Journal, 87, 44-53.
Sleeter, C. E. (2012). Confronting the Marginalization of Culturally Responsive Pedagogy. Urban Education, 47, 562-584.
Thomas, D. (2019). What It Means to Be Human in the Digital Age . https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-means-human-digital-age-dr-thomas-juli/
Tucci, L. (2014, March). What Is Information Age? Definition from WhatIs.com. SearchCIO. https://www.techtarget.com/searchcio/definition/Information-Age
Vahey, P. (2022, July 21). Student-Centered Instructional Strategies. www.hmhco.com. https://www.hmhco.com/blog/student-centered-instructional-strategies
Will, M., & Najarro, I. (2022, April 18). What Is Culturally Responsive Teach ing? Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/culturally-responsive-teaching-culturally-responsive-pedagogy/2022/04
William, A. (Tony) (2015). Teaching in a Digital Age. Tony Bates Associates Ltd. https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage