Beyond Problem-Solving: The Future of Learning in an AI-Driven World
- 1 Psychology Department, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan, USA
Abstract
As generative AI becomes increasingly integrated into higher education, its influence is reshaping what it means to learn, teach, and think. This paper questions whether education should continue prioritizing problem-solving in an era where machines excel at it. Drawing from constructivist theory, Bloom’s Taxonomy, and the Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence, the paper proposes a shift from utilitarian models of learning to a framework that emphasizes conceptual agility, dialectical reasoning, and meaning-making. We explore how AI may alter cognitive development, risk passive knowledge acquisition, and deepen achievement gaps—while also offering opportunities for enhanced scaffolded learning. Ultimately, this paper argues for a human-centered, inquiry-based model of education that redefines learning beyond the mastery of problems toward the cultivation of imagination, ethical reasoning, and epistemic curiosity.
- American Psychological Association, APA Board of Educational Affairs Working Group to Revise the APA Principles for Quality Undergraduate Education in Psychology (2023). Principles for Quality Undergraduate Education in Psychology . https://www.apa.org/about/policy/principles-quality-undergraduate-education-psychology.pdf
- Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.
- Arends, B. (2021). Bloom ’ s Taxonomy: Benefits and Limitations . Intentional College Teaching.
- Batista, J., Mesquita, A., & Carnaz, G. (2024). Generative AI and Higher Education: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions from a Systematic Literature Review. Information, 15, Article 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15110676
- Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Vol. 1: Cognitive Domain . McKay.
- Burns, L. R., Stephenson, P. L., & Bellamy, K. (2016). The Socratic Method: Empirical Assessment of a Psychology Capstone Course. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 15, 370-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716671824
- Dong, L., Tang, X., & Wang, X. (2025). Examining the Effect of Artificial Intelligence in Relation to Students’ Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100400
- Flanagan, D. P., & Dixon, S. G. (2014). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) Theory of Cognitive Abilities. In C. R. Reynolds, K. J. Vannest, & E. Fletcher-Janzen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Special Education . Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118660584.ese0431
- Fortner, M., & Katzarska-Miller, I. (2024). Using Generative AI to Promote the APA’s Five Goals for Undergraduate Majors. Teaching of Psychology . https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283241264793
- Fuller, R. B. (1969). Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth . Southern Illinois University Press.
- Gammoh, L. A. (2024). ChatGPT in Academia: Exploring University Students’ Risks, Misuses, and Challenges in Jordan. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 48, 608-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2024.2378298
- Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies, 15, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006