A 3-cycle action research on modular instruction employing the Community of Inquiry framework overarching the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model, revealed the need for assessments in addition to the usual paper-and-pencil tests. This qualitative study explored the experience on various assessments of an intact BSE math calculus class to complement the nature of a modular instruction. The teacher-researcher administered peer, self, reflective, and democratized assessments. Data were collected through students’ unstructured interview and survey and teacher-researcher observation and reflection. The study revealed that peer and self-assessments were appropriate in determining students’ acquired competency in terms of knowledge and skills validated during group studies. Reflective assessment which enhances metacognition, proved to be a potent evaluation tool in determining the ability of learners to make deeper connections between the lessons and lived experiences. Democratized assessment allowed the students to showcase their understanding of a particular lesson as they desire. Calculus agency which is the ability to use calculus correctly, was demonstrated through included literary works, visual arts, and audio-visual presentations. Students felt empowered when given the opportunity to decide on how they can prove their understanding of any concept in calculus. The assessments administered throughout the semester complemented the usual paper-and-pencil tests and underscored the relevance of student-centered assessments in a fully modular class.
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The Development of a Community of Inquiry over Time in an Online Course: Understanding the Progression and Integration of Social, Cognitive and Teaching Presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks , 12 , 3-23. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3.72
Bennett, R. E. (2018). Educational Assessment: What to Watch in a Rapidly Changing World. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice , 37 , 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12231
Boe, B.L. (1994). A Democratic Assessment Strategy. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED399238.pdf
Brown, G. T. L. (2022). The Past, Present and Future of Educational Assessment: A Transdisciplinary Perspective. Frontiers in Education , 7 , Article ID: 1060633. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1060633
Chan, C. K. Y., & Yeung, N. C. J. (2021). To Assess or Not to Assess Holistic Competencies—Student Perspectives in Hong Kong SAR. Studies in Educational Evaluation , 68 , 100984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100984
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-Assessment in Higher Education: A Review. Studies in Higher Education , 24 , 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935
Domingo, L. M. S. (2023a). Surviving a Calculus Class during the Pandemic: Affordances and Constraints of a Fully Modular Instruction Class. Creative Education , 14 , 29-40. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.141004
Domingo, L. M. S. (2023b). Surviving Distance Learning Calculus: Students’ Perspective, Practices, Experience and Performance on a Modular Instruction Class. SEACE Official Conference Proceedings (pp. 515-526). The International Academic Forum (IAFOR). https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2435-5240.2023.42
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education , 2 , 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective Online Instructional and Assessment Strategies. American Journal of Distance Education , 21 , 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653
Gelter, H. (2003). Why Is Reflective Thinking Uncommon. Reflective Practice , 4 , 337-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462394032000112237
Karal, H., & Cebi, A. (2012). Views on Modular Assessment and Evaluation Process in Distance Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences , 46 , 2073-2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.430
Karal, H., & Cebi, A. (2012). Views on Modular Assessment and Evaluation Process in Distance Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 46 , 2073-2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.430
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative Assessment and Self‐Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice. Studies in Higher Education , 31 , 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Nurlatifah, L., Purnawarman, P., & Sukyadi, D. (2023). The Implementation of Reflective Assessment Using Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle in Assessing Students’ Writing Skill. AIP Conference Proceedings , 2621 , Article 070006. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0143375
Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J-W. (2016). The Future of Student Self-Assessment: A Review of Known Unknowns and Potential Directions. Educational Psychology Review , 28 , 803-830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2
Rakova, E., Ibyatova, L., & Oparina, K. (2018). Modular Approach to Teaching and Learning English Grammar in Technical Universities. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (pp. 139-148). Society Integration Education. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3229
Rogers, R. R. (2001). Reflection in Higher Education: A Concept Analysis. Innovative Higher Education , 26 , 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010986404527
Ryan, M. (2011). Improving Reflective Writing in Higher Education: A Social Semiotic Perspective. Teaching in Higher Education , 16 , 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.507311
Sagun, R. D., & Prudente, M. (2021). Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Action Research Model to Re-Structure the Science Classroom Conforming to the Metacognitive Orientation Standards. Educational Action Research , 31 , 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1894964
Shohamy, E. (2001). Democratic Assessment as an Alternative. Language Testing , 18 , 373-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800404
Simms, M., & George, B. (2014). Approaching Assessment from a Learning Perspective: Elevating Assessment Beyond Technique. Educational Assessment , Evaluation and Accountability , 26 , 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9176-8
Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2017). Integrating Assessment with Learning: What Will It Take to Make It Work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The Future of Assessment (pp. 53-82). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315086545-3
Yan, L., Firetto, C. M., Starrett, E., Kingsbury, J. S., Penkrot, T. A., & Hyatt, J. K. (2023). Exploring Supports or Incentives to Promote Undergraduate Students’ Use of Cooperative Study Groups. International Journal of Educational Research Open , 4 , Article 100252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100252
Yan, Z., & Carless, D. (2021). Self-Assessment Is about More than Self: The Enabling Role of Feedback Literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 47 , 1116-1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431
Yang, Y., Yuan, K., Feng, X., Li, X., & van Aalst, J. (2022). Fostering Low‐Achieving Students’ Productive Disciplinary Engagement through Knowledge‐Building Inquiry and Reflective Assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology , 53 , 1511-1529. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13267
Yin, S., Chen, F., & Chang, H. (2022). Assessment as Learning: How Does Peer Assessment Function in Students’ Learning? Frontiers in Psychology , 13 , Article ID: 912568. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912568
Zulkifli, Z., Kristiawan, M., & Sasongko, R. N. (2022). Improving Students’ Active Learning through Demonstration Method. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan , 14 , 6539-6550. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2313