Phonics is Phondamental to Literacy Acquisition: An Examination of the Impact of Systematic Phonics-Based Instruction and Whole-Language Approaches — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Phonics is Phondamental to Literacy Acquisition: An Examination of the Impact of Systematic Phonics-Based Instruction and Whole-Language Approaches
Department of Teacher Education, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, United States
1 Department of Teacher Education, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, United States
This literature review investigates the effect of systematic phonics-based instruction and the whole language approach on early reading acquisition, specifically phonemic awareness, decoding, and orthographic mapping. Studies selected for this literature review contain empirical, qualitative, and quantitative research from 1998 to 2025, primarily focused on preschool through the primary grades and highlighting struggling readers. Theories, classical, and contemporary research consistently reveal that explicit phonics instruction is an effective instructional method to improve reading acquisition outcomes with effect sizes ranging from 1.0 to 2.0 (e.g., ; Johnston & Watson, 2005 ) and indicate that whole-language approaches lack efficacy due to English’s deep orthography. However, many studies are outdated, lack longitudinal data, and few examine implementation in preschool or bilingual settings. Survey data from Michigan educators reveal the implementation challenges contributing to the resistance in early childhood settings to systematic phonic-based instruction. This literature review highlights the necessity for classroom-based research that aligns with professional development and supports curricular decisions grounded in reading science. The results from this literature review illuminate the implications for theory, practice, and policy particularly aimed at closing the literacy gap for at-risk learners. The review concludes with a reflective application of the findings to instructional practice, offering insights for practitioners navigating the shift toward structured literacy.
Agüero, M. F. D. V., & Francioni, A. (2023). Synthetic Phonics: A Glimpse on Its Effectiveness in Teaching Young Learners to Read in English as a Foreign Language. International Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2, 20-42. https://doi.org/10.33422/ijsfle.v2i2.501
Beaven, K., Brown, S., & Carter, J. (2023). Examining the Impact of Systematic Phonics Instruction in Early Childhood Education: A Case Study. Journal of Literacy and Educational Practices, 18 , 45-62.
Bhattacharya, A., & Ehri, L. C. (2004). Graphosyllabic Analysis Helps Adolescent Struggling Readers Read and Spell Words. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370040501
Boyer, N., & Ehri, L. C. (2011). Contribution of Phonemic Segmentation Instruction with Letters and Articulation Pictures to Word Reading and Spelling in Beginners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 440-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.520778
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition from Novice to Expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19, 5-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
Contreras, S., & Parisi, J. (2024). Using Orthographic Mapping as a Routine to Improve Spelling Accuracy in Primary Grades. Illinois Reading Council Journal, 52, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.33600/ircj.52.3.2024.12
Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56, S25-S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411
Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-Phoneme Knowledge Is Essential for Learning to Read Words in English. In J. L. Metsala, & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word Recognition in Beginning Literacy (pp. 3-23). Taylor & Francis Group.
Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic Mapping in the Acquisition of Sight Word Reading, Spelling Memory, and Vocabulary Learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356
Foorman, B., Beyler, N., Borradaile, K., Coyne, M., Denton, C. A., Dimino, J., Furgeson, J., Hayes, L., Henke, J., Justice, L., Keating, B., Lewis, W., Sattar, S., Streke, A., Wagner, R., & Wissel, S. (2016). Foundational Skills to Support Reading for Understanding in Kindergarten through 3rd Grade (NCEE 2016-4008). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://whatworks.ed.gov
Hempenstall, K. (2005). The Whole Language-Phonics Controversy: A Historical Perspective. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404150509546797
Hernandez, D. J. (2011). Double Jeopardy: How Third-Grade Reading Skills and Poverty Influence High School Graduation. Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Johnston, R. S., McGeown, S., & Watson, J. E. (2011). Long-Term Effects of Synthetic versus Analytic Phonics Teaching on the Reading and Spelling Ability of 10 Year Old Boys and Girls. Reading and Writing, 25, 1365-1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9323-x
Johnston, R., & Watson, J. (2005). The Effects of Synthetic Phonics Teaching on Reading and Spelling Attainment: A Seven-Year Longitudinal Study. Scottish Executive Education Department.
Lane, H. B., Contesse, V. A., Gage, N. A., & Burns, M. K. (2025). Effect of an Instructional Program in Foundational Reading Skills on Early Literacy Development of Students in Kindergarten and First Grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 60, e607. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.607
Lexia Learning (2025). The Science of Reading vs. Balanced Literacy. https://www.lexialearning.com/blog/the-science-of-reading-vs-balanced-literacy
Moats, L. C., & Tolman, C. A. (2019). LETRS: Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling. Volume 1, Units 1-4 (2nd ed.). Voyager Sopris Learning.
Mulcahy, E., Bernardes, E., & Baars, S. (n.d.). The Relationship between Reading Age, Education, and Life Outcomes. LKMco.
National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Piasta, S. B., & Wagner, R. K. (2010). Developing Early Literacy Skills: A Meta‐Analysis of Alphabet Learning and Instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 8-38. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.45.1.2
Seidenberg, M. S. (2017). Language at the Speed of Sight: How We Read, Why So Many Can ’ t, and What Can Be Done about It. Basic Books.
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation Literacy Acquisition in European Orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143-174. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859
Shanahan, T. (2018). Which Is Best? Analytic or Synthetic Phonics? Reading Rockets. https://www.readingrockets.org/blogs/shanahan-on-literacy/which-best-analytic-or-synthetic-phonics
Shenoy, S., Iyer, A., & Zahedi, S. (2022). Phonics-Based Instruction and Improvement in Foundational Reading Skills of Kindergartners in the Indian Schooling Context. Early Childhood Education Journal, 52, 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01396-1
The Reading League (2022). Science of Reading: Defining Guide. https://www.thereadingleague.org/what-is-the-science-of-reading/
Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A. (2021). Introducing Grapheme-Phoneme Correspondences (GPCs): Exploring Rate and Complexity in Phonics Instruction for Kindergarteners with Limited Literacy Skills. Reading and Writing, 34, 109-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10064-y
Zaretsky, E. (2020). English Spelling Acquisition by English Language Learners from Spanish-Speaking Background: The Role of Cognitive and Linguistic Resources and L1 Reading Status. Cognitive Development, 55, Article ID: 100918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100918