“AI Can, but Can You?” Analysing the Impact of Text Generative AI on Students’ Creativity in the EFL Writing Classroom
- 1 English Language Center, College of Liberal Arts, Shantou University, Shantou, China
- 2 English Language Center, College of Liberal Arts, Shantou University, Shantou, China
Abstract
How can students preserve their creativity and critical thinking in the ubiquitous and unstoppable, rapidly advancing age of Text Generative Artificial Intelligence (TGAI) tools like ChatGPT and DeepSeek, among others? It has become a significant instrument for English writing in an English as a Foreign Language/English as a Second Language (EFL/ESL) classroom. TGAI is pervasive and noticeable in the world of English Language Teaching (ELT), influencing the variety of ways teachers teach and the innumerable ways in which students learn from the application of various writing software and applications (apps) available online. It has been observed that there is a significant improvement in the grammar/sentence structures of the writing tasks after students use TGAI. Students appear to even learn from the considerable transformation their essays undergo once TGAI technologies have reformed their writings. Now, teachers need to ensure that students use their own creativity while applying the technology at their disposal, rather than blindly handing over the TGAI-altered output to the teacher. This research implements the rubrics to analyse the quantitative findings, along with observations, attitudinal and interview data of the stakeholders, the students, to better understand the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI), and suggest strategies to employ for writing assignments. To this effect, the paper elucidates several recommendations that could be adopted and executed by educators to investigate and create positive pathways for the application of TGAI in writing, keeping in view the predominant possible downsides, namely, lack of creativity/critical thinking skills development and ways of avoiding the damaging possibility of simply copy-pasting material from the script writing software available. The student-centred scenario in this research, supports the integration of TGAI as an effective and engaging tool to incentivize the writing assignments in an EFL/ESL classroom, provided certain strategies to overcome the shortcomings are adhered to. The outcome of this study was the development of various recommendations made through class observations, interviews and tests by the facilitators and by the users of the TGAI technology, the students themselves. These recommendations and ideas can be implemented by educators when assigning writing projects to learners. A noteworthy outcome of this research was the opportunity presented to the students and teachers, to make an estimated projection of the writing final examination scores because of the use/overuse of AI during class writing tasks. The scores received in the writing assignment during the study, corresponded largely with the final exam scores, thereby making this study a reliable predictor to help in timely alerting the teacher and the student to prepare for the final examination. This analytical study goes on to develop strategies for the effective and practical implementation of TGAI when teaching/learning writing in the EFL/ESL classroom, while encouraging students to rely on their own creativity instead of depending solely on AI.
- Amabile, T., & Pratt, M. (2016). The Dynamic Componential Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations: Making Progress, Making Meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior , 36, 157-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
- Bruffee, K. (1981). Collaborative Learning. College English, 43, 745-747. https://www.jstor.org/stable/376907 https://doi.org/10.2307/376907
- Bruffee, K. (1995). Sharing Our Toys: Cooperative Learning versus Collaborative Learning. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning , 27 , 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.9937722
- Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H. R., & Su, F. (2021). Twenty-Five Years of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: A Topic Modelling Analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 25, 151-185. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73454 https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73454
- Dictionary.com (2016). Creativity (Definition #2). http://www.dictionary.com/browse/creativity
- Duggan, S. (2020). AI in Education: Change at the Speed of Lightening. UNESCO IITE Policy Brief.
- Gandhioke, S., & Singh, C. (2024). English Through ART—Incorporating Art in the ESL/EFL Classroom through Peer Collaboration to Encourage Language Production, Acquisition and Learning Outcomes. Creative Education, 15, 1846-1864. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2024.159113
- Gupta, S., Jaiswal, A., Paramasivam, A. & Kotecha, J. (2022). Academic Writing Challenges and Supports: Perspectives of International Doctoral Students and Their Supervisors. Frontiers in Education , 7 , Article 891534. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361613196 https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.891534
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2001). Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta-Analysis. University of Minnesota, Cooperative Learning Center, Research Report. Submitted for publication. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31640337
- John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative Collaboration. Oxford University Press.
- Kalanithi, L. S. R. (2021). Reducing the Affective Filter in Tertiary Level ESL Learners— Some Effective Strategies . https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352707328
- Landa Blanco, M., & Agüero-Flores, M. & Mercado, M. (2023). Human vs. AI Authorship: Does it Matter in Evaluating Creative Writing? A Pilot Study Using ChatGPT. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369111252 https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wjsm3
- Michel, M., Bazhutkina, I., Abel, N., & Strobl, C. (2025). Collaborative Writing Based on Generative AI Models: Revision and Deliberation Processes in German as a Foreign Language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 67, Article 101185. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374325000104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101185