College Students’ Perceptions: The Influence of Syllabi Structural Elements on Course Performance
- 1 Department of Educational Studies, The University of Tennessee at Martin, Martin, USA
Abstract
Course syllabi have been used in college classrooms for decades. Despite their usage, there is limited data to determine their effectiveness. There is also a lack of clarity in the most appropriate structure and elements needed to influence students’ course performance. Professors’ course syllabi tend to be the first form of communication to students to share policies, assignments, and other course materials. Syllabi often provide course outlines that include methods to communicate, topics of discussion, and expected outcomes. Some colleges use a unified template, while others allow professors to choose their structure. The purpose of this study was to investigate students, from a West Tennessee University undergraduate course, perceptions of course syllabi structure influence on their course performance. A quantitative method was used during a group approach to distribute questions that allowed the researcher to gain insight of students’ perceptions. The findings of this study found that 85% of students viewed syllabi structural elements as essential to course performance, though formatting, organization, and length could be barriers to readability and usefulness.
- Albrecht, M. L. (2009). Getting Started: Writing the Course Syllabus. HortTechnology, 19, 240-246. https://doi.org/10.21273/horttech.19.2.240
- Beatie, B. A., Martin, L., & Oberst, B. S. (1984). Reading in the First‐Year College Textbook: A Syllabus for Textbook Authors, Publishers, Reviewers, and Instructors. The Modern Language Journal, 68, 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1984.tb01565.x
- Bowers-Campbell, J. (2015). Investigating the Syllabus as a Defining Document. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 45, 106-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2015.1030240
- Calhoon, S., & Becker, A. (2008). How Students Use the Course Syllabus. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020106
- Harrington, C. M., & Gabert-Quillen, C. A. (2015). Syllabus Length and Use of Images: An Empirical Investigation of Student Perceptions. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1, 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000040
- Hess, J. L., & Whittington, M. S. (2003). Developing an Effective Course Syllabus. NACTA Journal, 47, 23-27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43765776
- Matejka, K., & Kurke, L. B. (1994). Designing a Great Syllabus. College Teaching, 42, 115-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1994.9926838
- Perrault, E. K. (2026). Syllabus Information and the Relative Importance of Content They Can Contain. College Teaching, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2026.2612968
- Smith, M. F., & Razzouk, N. Y. (1993). Improving Classroom Communication: The Case of the Course Syllabus. Journal of Education for Business, 68, 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1993.10117616
- Stevens, E. M., & Gibson, R. (2017). An Examination of Mastery-and Performance-Based Orientations in Strategic Communication Syllabi and Suggestions for Rhetorical and Pedagogical Improvement. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 28, 61-80.
- Wagner, J. L., Smith, K. J., Johnson, C., Hilaire, M. L., & Medina, M. S. (2023). Best Practices in Syllabus Design. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 87, ajpe8995. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8995
- Watts, J. (2026). “I’m Not Mean”: How the Course Syllabus Communicates Power. College Teaching, 74, 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2024.2335278
- Wheeler, L. B., Palmer, M., & Aneece, I. (2019). Students’ Perceptions of Course Syllabi: The Role of Syllabi in Motivating Students. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130307