The CRAFT Framework: A Pedagogical Model for Teaching Expressive Drawing and Painting with Artificial Intelligence—A Critical Integrative Review — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
The CRAFT Framework: A Pedagogical Model for Teaching Expressive Drawing and Painting with Artificial Intelligence—A Critical Integrative Review
Department of Visual Arts, College of Art and Design, Taibah University, Medina, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
1 Department of Visual Arts, College of Art and Design, Taibah University, Medina, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
This paper proposes CRAFT (Conceive, Render, Articulate, reFine, Transmit), a five-stage pedagogical framework for teaching expressive drawing and painting with generative artificial intelligence (AI), and evaluates the framework against the recent empirical literature. A critical integrative review of ten primary studies (eleven datasets, as one study reports two experiments) and three systematic reviews from 2023-2026 was conducted under a Design Science Research orientation. Reported findings from each study were mapped onto CRAFT’s five stages by a single author. Within the art-and-design education literature, prompt-engineering literacy and AI knowledge predict innovative thinking and creative self-efficacy in design students; structured AI-assisted instruction is associated with higher achievement, motivation, and self-efficacy in design and art courses; and short, unscaffolded interventions are reported to leave students frustrated with AI’s execution of nuanced artistic tasks. Adjacent creative-task evidence provides additional, though non-studio, support for co-creative interface design. Direct experimental evidence from drawing and painting studios remains thin; CRAFT is therefore presented as a candidate scaffold that motivates, but does not substitute for, direct comparative evaluation in studio art settings. The paper contributes a structured pedagogical framework, an honest synthesis of recent primary studies, and a research agenda for future direct evaluation.
KeywordsArtificial IntelligenceGenerative ArtPainting and Drawing PedagogyStudio PracticeConceptual FrameworkCritical Integrative Review
Al-Dhaqm, A., Razak, S., Othman, S. H., Ali, A., Ghaleb, F. A., Rosman, A. S., & Marni, N. (2020). Categorization and Organization of Database Forensic Investigation Processes. IEEE Access, 8, 112846-112858. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3000747
Al-Dhaqm, A., Razak, S., Othman, S. H., Choo, K. R., Glisson, W. B., Ali, A. et al. (2017). CDBFIP: Common Database Forensic Investigation Processes for Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 5, 24401-24416. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2762693
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives . Longman.
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41, 16-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x11428813
Ansone, A., Zālīte-Supe, Z., & Daniela, L. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Catalyst for Change in Higher Education Art Study Programs. Computers, 14, Article 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14040154
Boden, M.A. (1998) Creativity and Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence , 103, 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(98)00055-1
Cetinic, E., & She, J. (2022). Understanding and Creating Art with AI: Review and Outlook. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 18, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3475799
Chaseley, T. L., & Abercrombie, S. (2025). Using Scaffolds to Support Preservice Teachers’ Reflective Practice. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article ID: 1621269. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1621269
Chen, J., Mokmin, N. A. M., & Su, H. (2025). Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence into Design and Art Course: Effects on Student Achievement, Motivation, and Self-Efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62, 1431-1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2025.2503857
Chiu, M.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2025). Enhancing Student Creative and Critical Thinking in Generative Ai-Empowered Creation: A Mind-Mapping Approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 34, 869-890. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2511244
Davis, N., Hsiao, C., Yashraj Singh, K., Li, L., & Magerko, B. (2016). Empirically Studying Participatory Sense-Making in Abstract Drawing with a Co-Creative Cognitive Agent. In J. Nichols, J. Mahmud, J. O’Donovan, C. Conati, & M. Zancanaro (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 196-207). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2856767.2856795
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as Experience. Minton, Balch & Company.
Eisner, E. W. (2002). The Arts and the Creation of Mind . Yale University Press.
Fleischmann, K. (2024). Making Tacit Knowledge Explicit: The Case for Online Peer Feedback in the Studio Critique. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 35, 699-721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09911-8
Hertzmann, A. (2020). Computers Do Not Make Art, People Do. Communications of the ACM, 63, 45-48. https://doi.org/10.1145/3347092
Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. M. (2013). Studio Thinking 2: The Real Benefits of Visual Arts Education (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Hiçyilmaz, Y. (2025). An Innovative Approach in Arts Education: Student Experiences of Abstract Art Practices Supported by Generative Artificial Intelligence. SAGE Open, 15, 1-19.
Ho, J., Jain, A., & Abbeel, P. (2020). Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 6840-6851.
Holstein, K. and Doroudi, S. (2022) Equity and Artificial Intelligence in Education. In The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education , Routledge, 151-173. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429329067-9
Hwang, Y., & Wu, Y. (2025a). The Influence of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Creative Cognition of Design Students: A Chain Mediation Model of Self-Efficacy and Anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article ID: 1455015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1455015
Hwang, Y., & Wu, Y. (2025b). Graphic Design Education in the Era of Text‐to‐Image Generation: Transitioning to Contents Creator. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 44, 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12558
Iliasova, L., Nekrasova, I., Mena, J., & Estrada-Molina, O. (2025). Microteaching on Pre-Service Teachers’ Education: Literature Review. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article ID: 1562975. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562975
Jiang, Y., Fan, Y., & Liu, Z. (2025). Generative AI in Art Education: A Systematic Review of Research Trends, Tool Applications, and Outcomes (2019-2025). Education Sciences, 16, Article 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010047
Karras, T., Aittala, M., Lehtinen, J., Hellsten, J., Aila, T., & Laine, S. (2024). Analyzing and Improving the Training Dynamics of Diffusion Models. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 24174-24184). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02282
Lemley, M. A., & Casey, B. (2021). Fair Learning. Texas Law Review, 99, 743-785.
Liu, V., & Chilton, L. B. (2022). Design Guidelines for Prompt Engineering Text-to-Image Generative Models. In S. Barbosa, P. Lampe, P. Appert et al. (Eds.), CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-23). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501825
Manovich, L. (2018). AI Aesthetics . Strelka Press.
Manovich, L., & Arielli, E. (2024). Artificial Aesthetics: Generative AI, Art and Visual Media . https://manovich.net/index.php/projects/artificial-aesthetics
McGuire, J., De Cremer, D., & Van de Cruys, T. (2024). Establishing the Importance of Co-Creation and Self-Efficacy in Creative Collaboration with Artificial Intelligence. Scientific Reports, 14, Article No. 18525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69423-2
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108, 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Ogunleye, B., Zakariyyah, K. I., Ajao, O., Olayinka, O., & Sharma, H. (2024). A Systematic Review of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning Practice. Education Sciences, 14, Article 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060636
Park, J., & Choo, S. (2025). Generative AI Prompt Engineering for Educators: Practical Strategies. Journal of Special Education Technology, 40, 411-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434241298954
Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2022). High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models. In Proceedings of the 20 22 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 10674-10685). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01042
Sáez-Velasco, S., Alaguero-Rodríguez, M., Delgado-Benito, V., & Rodríguez-Cano, S. (2024). Analysing the Impact of Generative AI in Arts Education: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective of Educators and Students in Higher Education. Informatics, 11, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11020037
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Jossey-Bass.
Selwyn, N. (2024). On the Limits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy , 10, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v10.6062
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 356-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Tour, E., & Zadorozhnyy, A. (2025). Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Prompt Literacy for English Language Learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 69, e70020. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.70020
Vartiainen, H., Kahila, J., Tedre, M., López-Pernas, S., & Pope, N. (2025). Enhancing Children’s Understanding of Algorithmic Biases in and with Text-to-Image Generative Ai. New Media & Society, 27, 5342-5368. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241252820
Vartiainen, H., Tedre, M., & Jormanainen, I. (2023). Co-Creating Digital Art with Generative AI in K-9 Education: Socio-Material Insights. International Journal of Education Through Art, 19, 405-423. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00143_1
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The Integrative Review: Updated Methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52, 546-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Wu, F., Dang, Y., & Li, M. (2025). A Systematic Review of Responses, Attitudes, and Utilization Behaviors on Generative AI for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Behavioral Sciences, 15, Article 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15040467
Yannakakis, G. N., Liapis, A., & Alexopoulos, C. (2014). Mixed-Initiative Co-Creativity. In M. Mateas, T. Barnes, & I. Bogost (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG 2014) . Society for the Advancement of the Science of Digital Games.
Zhuang, Z., & Li, X. (2025). The Influence of Collaborative Music Creation Supported by Generative Artificial Intelligence on Students’ Creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article ID: 1709513. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1709513