On Fostering a Co-Creative Process within a CSCL Framework
- 1 Facultad de Estadística e Informática, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico
- 2 División de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tec. de Monterrey-Campus Cuernavaca, Cuernavaca, Mexico
- 3 Facultad de Estadística e Informática, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico
Abstract
In this article is introduced a co-creative process fostered by a Collaborative Learning Framework which pursues to engage peers of students in a synchronous collaborative dynamic to build the knowledge by representing it by a formal digraph called Networks of Concepts (NoC). This digraph, the NoC, allows building and representing the knowledge in a synthetic way, whilethe co-creative process aims at developing cognitive skills and collaborative attitudes as essential part of 21st century skills for students. Nowadays,the Collaborative Learning Framework has been and is currently being used in Mexican universities in different undergraduate programs such as Industrial Engineering, Computer Science, Sociology, Accounting, Business Administration, and Molecular Biology; in this article we analyze and discuss a particular case of an example in the Engineering program. Thus, the analyzed digraphs are the outcome of a co-creative process that is carried out through synchronous-mode argumentation and shared interactions by peers of students.
- Barrows, H. (1985). Designing a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical year. New York: Springer.
- Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. N. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Berlin: Springer.
- Diaz, M. (2009). Petri nets: Fundamental models, verification and applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-ISTE.
- Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Oxford: Elsevier.
- Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O'Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In P. S. Reimann (Ed.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Oxford: Pergamon.
- Garrison, D. (1992). Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: An analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly, 42, 136-148.
- Gibbons, M. (2002). The self-directed learning handbook: Challenging adolescent students to excel. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Giemza, A., & Ziebarth, S. (2008). Overview of the freestyler modeling environment. Recuperado el Noviembre de 2009, de Collide Faculty of Engineering, University of Duisburg-Essen. URL. http://www.collide.info/images/b/b1/FreeStyler_description.pdf
- Goel, V. (1992). A comparison of well-structured and ill-structured task environments and problem spaces. In Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the Cognitive science society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Goodsell, A. S., Maher, M., Tinto, V., Leigh, S. B., & MacGregor, J. (1992). Collaborative Learning: A sourcebook for higher education. University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.
- Gunasekaran, A. (1998). Agile manufacturing: Enablers and an implementation framework. International Journal of Production Research, 36, 1223-1247. dsoi:10.1080/002075498193291
- Jonassen, D. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45, 65-94.
- Koschman, T., Feltovich, P., Myers, A., & Barrows, H. (1992). Implications of CSCL for problem-based learning. ACM SIGCUE Outlook, 21, 32-35.
- Lumsden, C. (1999). Evolving creative minds: Stories and mechanisms. In R. Sternberg, & T. Lubart (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 153-168). London: Cambridge University Press.