Analogies for Teaching Mutant Allele Dominance Concepts
- 1 Biology Department, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, USA
Abstract
Analogies connect new and familiar concepts and ideas by providing a comfortable and known framework within which students can integrate new concepts. Use of analogies to aid understanding of abstract and/or complex ideas is commonly used in molecular sciences, such as genetics, molecular biology, and biochemistry. Five analogies for different mechanisms of mutant allele dominance, a seemingly counter-intuitive idea in genetics, were designed and assessed in an upper division undergraduate/masters level course. Each of the five mechanisms, haploinsufficiency, acquired function, poison product, increased activity, and inappropriate expression, was described in the context of a human disease and molecular mechanism and followed by a descriptive analogy which mirrored the molecular mechanism using real world items or a video clip. The majority of students reported increased interest, understanding, and engagement following the analogies, as well as decreased confusion.
- Becker, M. A., Meyer, L. J., & Seegmiller, J. E. (1973). Gout with purine overproduction due to increased phosphoribosyl phosphate synthetase activity. American Journal of Medicine, 55, 232-242. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(73)90174-5 Busciglio, R. (2010). Lucy candy 3. URL. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YGF5R9i53A
- De Klein, A., Van Kessel, A. G., Grosveld, G., Bartram, C. R., Hagemeijer, A., Bootsma, D., Spurr, N. K., Heisterkamp, N., Groffen, J., & Stephenson, J. R. (1982). A cellular oncogene is translocated to the Philadelphia chromosome in chronic myelocytic leukaemia. Nature, 300, 765-767. doi:10.1038/300765a0
- Dougherty, M. J. (2009). Closing the gap: Inverting the genetics curriculum to ensure an informed public. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 85, 6-12. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.05.010
- Gericke, N. M., & Hagberg, M. (2007). Definition of historical models of gene function and their relation to students’ understanding of genetics. Science & Education, 16, 849-881. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9064-4
- Glynn, S. M. (1995). Conceptual bridges: Using analogies to explain scientific concepts. The Science Teacher, 62, 25-27.
- Glynn, S. M. (2007). Methods and strategies: The Teaching-with- analogies model. Science and Children, 44, 52-55.
- Glynn, S. M. (2008). Making science concepts meaningful to students: Teaching with analogies. In S. Mikelskis-Seifert, U. Ringelband, & M. Brückmann (Eds.), Four decades of research in science education: From curriculum development to quality improvement (pp. 113- 125). Münster: Waxmann.
- Herrick, J. B. (1910). Peculiar elongated and sickle-shaped red blood corpuscles in a case of severe anemia. Archives of Internal Medicine, 6, 517-521.
- Korkko, J., Ritvaniemi, P., Haataja, L., Kaariainen, H., Kivirikko, K. I., Prockop, D. J., & Ala-Kokko, L. (1993). Mutation in type II procollagen (COL2A1) that substitutes aspartate for glycine alpha-I-67 and that causes cataracts and retinal detachment: Evidence for molecular heterogeneity in the Wagner syndrome and the Stickler syndrome (arthro-ophthalmopathy). The American Journal of Human Genetics, 53, 55-61.
- Oliva, J. M., Axcarate, P., & Navarrete, A. (2007). Teaching models in the use of analogies as a resource in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 45-66. doi:10.1080/09500690600708444
- Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (2012). MIM Number: {108300}. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University. URL (last checked 20 January 2012). http://omim.org/