When Children Draw vs When Children Don’t: Exploring the Effects of Observational Drawing in Science
- 1 University of Houston, Victoria, Victoria, USA
- 2 University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, USA
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate how kindergarten children’s observational drawings impact their information retention. This research was conducted in an urban school in a large metropolitan area in the southwestern United States. Forty-two kindergarten children participated in this study; approximately 97% of them qualified for free and/or reduced lunch. For this study, children’s retention of factual infor mation was compared using a paired t-test of when they drew and when they didn’t. Children scored higher on all 7 items—descriptions of observation, location, action, color, size, shape, and sound—when they drew than when they didn’t. Findings were statistically significant for descriptions of observation (t = 3.08, p = .00) and location (t = 2.36, p = .02).
- Abruscato, J. (2004). Teaching children science. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
- Alden, A. (2009). What is observing? An explanation of observation. http://geology.about.com/od/ activitiesbasics/a/observation.htm
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (1997). Resources for scientific literacy: Professional development. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Bosse, S., Jacobs, G., & Anderson, T. L. (2009). Science in the air. Young Children, 64, 10-15.
- Brooks, M. (2003). Drawing to learn. NAEYC Beyond Journal. http://www.naeyc.org/files/yc/file/2003 09/DrawingtoLearn.pdf
- Brooks, M. (2009). Drawing, visualization and young children’s exploration of “Big Ideas.” International Journal of Science Education, 31, 319-341. doi:10.1080/09500690802595771
- California Department of Education (1998). Science content standards for California public schools. http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/sciencestnd.pdf
- Connecticut State Department of Education (2004). Core science curriculum framework. http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/cwp/view.asp?a=26188q=320890
- Dove, J. E., Everett, L. A., & Preece, P. F. W. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children’s drawings. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 485-497. doi:10.1080/095006999290534
- Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2009). From every day to scientific observation: How children learn to observe the biologist’s world. Re view of Educational Research, 79, 39-68. doi:10.3102/0034654308325899
- Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (1998). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach advanced reflections (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Ablex.
- Ford, D. (2005). The challenges of observing geologically: Third graders’ descriptions of rock and mineral properties. International Journal of Science, 89, 276-295.
- Fox, J. E. (2010). The role of drawing in kindergarteners’ science observations. International Research Journal for Art in Early Childhood Education, 2.
- Howes, E. V. (2007). Educative experiences and early childhood science education: A Deweyan perspective on learning to observe. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 536-549. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.03.006
- Howitt, C., Lewis, S., & Upson, E. (2011). “It’s a mystery!” a case study of implementing forensic science in preschool as scientific inquiry. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36, 45-55.