Introducing Online Learning in Higher Education: An Evaluation
- 1 St Mary’s University College, London, UK
Abstract
Traditionally, in educational contexts, learning and teaching has been seen as a direct interpersonal classroom activity. However, with the development of information technology in general and Internet and online technologies in particular, there has been an increasing emphasis on the development of distance learning methods, providing opportunities to extend boundaries of space and time. In this paper, the author sets out to present the findings of a case-study enquiry into student perceptions of the introduction of an e-learning component as part of their experience of an M.A. programme in Catholic School Leadership at St Mary’s University College, Twickenham. By engaging with online learning, students were able to participate in a “virtual classroom” through which they were able to share discussions initiated by questions that were provided online. The introduction of online learning, therefore, represents a significant development that had a potential impact on pedagogy and assessment. This paper concludes that, whilst there were some anxieties about the introduction of the facility, students acknowledged that, generally, online activities enhanced the quality of their education.
- Barnett, R., & Hallam, S. (1999). Teaching for supercomplexity: A pedagogy for higher education. In P. Mortimore (Ed.), Understand ing pedagogy and its impact on learning (pp. 137-154). London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
- Bell, J. (1996). Doing your research project. Buckingham: Open Uni versity Press.
- Bennell, P., & Pearce, T. (2003). The internationalisation of higher edu cation: Exporting education to developing and transnational econo mies. International Journal of Educational Development, 23, 215 232. doi:10.1016/S0738-0593(02)00024-X
- Briggs, A. R. J., & Coleman, M. (2007). Research methods in educa tional leadership and management (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Bridges, D. (2000) Back to the future: The higher education curriculum in the 21st century. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30, 37-55.
- Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (1999). Universities in transition: The challenge of new technologies. Cambridge Philosophy of Education Conference, 18 September 1999.
- Exley, K., & Dennick, R. (2005). Small group teaching. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
- Green, A. (1997). Education, globalisation and the nation state. New York: Macmillan Press, Basingstoke and St Martin’s Press. doi:10.1057/9780230371132
- Illich, I. (1971) Deschooling society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
- Jarvis, P., Holford, J., & Griffin, C. (2003). The theory & practice of learning. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
- Lea, M. R. (2004). Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 739-756. doi:10.1080/0307507042000287230
- Middlewood, D., & Lumby, J. (2001). Strategic management in schools and colleges. London: Paul Chapman.
- Nisbet, J. D., & Watt, J. (1978). Case study, rediguide No. 26. Nottingham: Nottingham University.
- Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
- Watkins, C. (2005). Classrooms as learning communities: A review of research. London Review of Education, 3, 47-64. doi:10.1080/14748460500036276
- Williams, P. (2005). Lessons from the future: ICT scenarios and the education of teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 31, 319 339. doi:10.1080/02607470500280209