Metaphors Used by Malaysian Teachers-in-Training: Implications for Language Teacher Education
- 1 Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- 2 Faculty of Education, Sultan Idris University of Education, Perak, Malaysia
- 3 Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
- 4 Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Abstract
Over the past 20 years, there has been increasing interest in exploring what language teachers believe (Borg, 2006). Often these beliefs are expressed in terms of metaphors (Richards, 1998; Woodward, 1991), but there has been little recent research connecting the two strands. The present study is based on the personal reflections of a group of 72 trainee teachers in a Malaysian University after a three-month practicum in local high schools. In these reflections, as well as currently fashionable constructs such as facilitator and motivator, these students often described their perceptions of the role of the language teacher using various metaphors. The wide range of metaphors volunteered by these trainee teachers were coded into various categories, such as terms relating to facilitating, mentorship, entertaining and kinship. This presentation will discuss a number of these, and also quote some of the trainees’ comments in support of their chosen metaphor, which thereby revealstheir underlying beliefs about teaching and learning. Relating their professional activity to other roles illuminates not only what teachers themselves believe, but also reinvigorates notions of (language) teaching itself. One of the implications of this study is that teacher educators, both in the specific setting and in relatable contexts elsewhere, can incorporate such metaphors into their programmes and in this way reimagine, refine and redefine the role of the language teacher for the benefit of their students, and themselves.
- Barkhuizen, G., & Wette, R. (2008) Narrative frames for investigating the experiences of language teachers. System, 36, 372-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.002
- Barnard, R., & Burns, A. (2012). Introduction. In R. Barnard, & A. Burns (Eds.), Researching language teacher cognition and practice: International case studies (pp. 1-10). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
- Barnard, R., & McLellan, J. (forthcoming-due date 2012). Introduction. In R. Barnard, & J. McLellan, J. (Eds.), Code switching in university English language classes: Case studies and perspectives from Asian contexts. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
- Borg, S. (1998). Teachers’ peda-gogical systems and grammar teaching: A qualitative study. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 9-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587900
- Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London, England: Conti-nuum.
- Braine, G. (2010), Nonnative speaker English teachers: Research, pedagogy, and professional growth. New York & London: Routledge.
- Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Brown, J. D. (2009). Open-response items in questionnaires. In J. Heigham, & R. A. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction (pp. 200-219). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Canh, L. V., & Barnard, R. (2009). Curricular innovation behind closed classroom doors: A Vietnamese case study. Prospect, 24, 20-33.
- Canh, L. V., & Maley, A. Interviews. In R. Barnard & A. Burns (Eds.), Researching language teacher cognition and practice: International case studies (pp. 90-108). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London, England: Sage.
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London, England: Routledge Falmer.
- Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and eva-luating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
- Chen, D. (2003). A classification system for metaphors about teaching. JOPERD, 74, 24-31.