This paper examines the contribution of classroom students’ seating positions to learning gains. Data were gathered from a sample of 1907 grade six students who sat for the same seat twice over an interval of about 10 months. They were drawn from a random selection of 72 low and high performing primary schools. Results of a multi-level regression show that seating in the front row in a classroom led to higher learning gains of between 5 percent and 27 percent compared to seating in other rows that are farther away from the chalkboard. The policy implication to education is that student’s seating position can be manipulated in a way that it optimizes learning gains for slow learners.
KeywordsClassroomAssessmentLearningSeatTeaching
Benedict, M. E., & Hoag, J. (2004). Seating location in large lectures: Are seating preferences or location related to course performance? Journal of Economic Education, 35, 215-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JECE.35.3.215-231
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 371-406. http://aerj.aera.net http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
Georges, A., Borman, K. M., & Lee, R. S. (2010). Mathematics reform and teacher quality in elementary grades: Assessments, teacher licensure, and certification. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 18, 1-36. http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/757
Glewwe, P. (2002). Schools and skills in developing countries: Education policies and socioeconomic outcomes. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 436-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161258
Goldschmidt, P., & Phelps, G. (2010). Does teacher professional development affect content and pedagogical knowledge: How much and for how long? Economics of Education Review, 29, 432-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.002
Government of Kenya (2005). Education statistical booklet 1999-2004. Nairobi: Ministry of Education Science and Technology.
Granstrom, K. (1996). Private communication between students in a classroom in relation to different classroom features. Educational Psychology, 16, 349-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144341960160401
Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2007). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. CALDER Working Paper No. 3. http://www.caldercenter.org/PDF/1001059_Teacher_Training.pdf
Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall, K., Woolner, P., & McCaughey, C. (2005). The impact of school environments: A literature review. Callaghan, NSW: University of Newcastle. http://www.cfbt.com/PDF/91085.pdf
Juhary, J. (2012). An assigned seating arrangement based on students’ performance: A critical review. Journal of Education and Practice, 3. (Online) http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/3414/3441
Kalinowski, S., & Taper, M. L. (2007). The effect of seat location on exam grades and student perceptions in an introductory biology class. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36, 54-57.
Kaya, N., & Burgess, B. (2007). Territoriality seat preferences in different types of classroom arrangements. Environment and Behaviour, 39, 859-879. http://eab.sagepub.com http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298798
Levine, D. W., O’Neal, E. C., Garwood, S. G., & McDonald, P. J. (1980). Classroom ecology: The effects of seating position on grades and participation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 409-412. http://psp.sagepub.com/content/6/3/409.abstract
Marshall, J. H. (2009). School quality and learning gains in rural Guatemala. Economics of Education Review, 28, 207-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.10.009
Martin, S. H. (2002). The classroom environment and its effect on the practice of teachers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 139156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0239
Marx, A., Fuhrer, U., & Hartig, T. (2006). Effects of classroom seating arrangements on children’s question-asking. Learning Environment Research, 2, 249-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009901922191
McCaffrey, D. F., Lockwood, J. R., Koretz, D., Louis, T. A., & Hamilton, L. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 67-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/10769986029001067
Morrison, F. J., Bachman, H. J., & Connor, C. M. (2005). Improving literacy in America: Guidelines from research. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Moore, D. W., & Glynn, T. (1984). Variations in question rate as a function of position in the classroom. Educational Psychology, 4, 233-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144341840040304
Ngware, M. W., Oketch, M., & Ezeh, A. C. (2011). Quality of primary education inputs in urban schools: Evidence from Nairobi. Education and Urban Society, 43, 91-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124510379131
Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. (2005). The surprising impact of seat location on student performance. The Physics Teacher, 43, 30-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1845987
Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the prospects study of elementary schools. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Research Report Series RR-051. http://www.americancivil.literacy.org/sites/default/files/researchreport/791_rr51.pdf
Siang, T. K. (1991). The effects of seat location on students’ learning behaviour in the classroom. Singapore Journal of Education, 11, 7175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02188799108547675
Tagliacollo, V. A., Volpato, G. L., & Pereira Jr., A. (2010). Association of student position in classroom and school performance. Educational Research, 1, 198-201. http://interesjournal.org/ER/Abstracts/2010%20abstract/July/Tagliacollo%20et%20al.htm
Thomas, B. (2003). Take my chair (please). Chronicle of Higher Education, 49, 36-38.
Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2000). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York: Springer,
Wannarka, R., & Ruhl, K. (2008). Seating arrangements that promote positive academic and behavioural outcomes: A review of empirical research. Support for Learning, 23, 89-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9604.2008.00375.x