Gender and Constructs from the Hidden Curriculum
- 1 Maestría en Educación, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit Tepic, Tepic, México
- 2 Estudios de Género, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit Tepic, Tepic, México
- 3 Secretaría de Docencia, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit Tepic, Tepic, México
Abstract
The school is a foundational instance in the constructionism of gender, because of the rationale of its purposes and the framing of its semantic intentions in organizing awareness of individuals as persons and in their participation as citizens. However, once the school has determined its interventions, it is left unchecked on the implicit or invisible contents which are structurally incorporated in the person, and without this basis, the contributions to the official curriculum would be practically null. This work addresses an integrative epistemology in both official and hidden curricula, and their impact on society. The receptors and learners become partners of the constructs that provide identity or non-identity through symbolic formations of a real culture which is internalized and exercised in everyday life. The gender aftermath of the hidden curriculum from the school curriculum contents are very important in designing the sense of living of the individuals and, in this sense, the school becomes a code of co-participatory citizenship builder. The patterns of education support the basis, out of which are built definitions of the individual identity and of the collectivity, meaning both teachers and learners, managers and actors of the differences of gender.
- Bustos, O. (1994). Gender formation, the impact of socialization through education in human sexuality (pp. 267-298). Mexico: Anthology Consejo Nacional de Población..
- Bourdieu, P. (1964). I Héritiers, Paris: Ed De Minuit.
- Et Jean-Claude, P. (1970). La Reproduction. Paris: Minuit Ed.
- Gimenez, G. (2002). Introduction to sociology (pp. 1-11). Pedagogical University Collection, No. 37-38.
- Bernstein, B. (1970). Education cannot compensate for society (pp. 344-347). London: New Society, 38.
- Fernández, A. M. (1994). Woman of the illusion. Chap. II and VI. Buenos Aires: Ed Paidós.
- Fernández-Balboa, J. M. (1993) Sociocultural characteristics of the hidden curriculum, in physical education. Quest, 45, 230-254. Freire, P. (1973). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
- Giroux, H. A. (1997). Professors as Intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Buenos Aires: Edit. Paidos,
- González Luna Corvera, T. (1994). Towards construction of values in education “My love, the last one!” Synectica, No. 5. www.educandoenigualdad.com
- Goldberg, S. (1973). The instability of patriarchy. Madrid: Alianza. Ed.
- Jackson, W. Ph. (1968). Life in classrooms (p. 215). Ed. Morata.
- Davis, J., Fuentes, J., & Sparkes, B. C. (2005) What remains hidden of the hidden curriculum?) Identities of gender and sexuality in physical education. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 39, 73-90.
- Hernández, A., Cortes, N., Rodriguez H., Menendez, M., & Barber, J. I. (1996). Teachers’ training in physical education. Gender as a differentiating factor. In S. Ricardo (Ed.), Challenges of social sciences applied to sports (pp. 161 -169). Pamplona: AEISAD.
- Jurjo Torres, S. (2011). Justice in the curriculum. The Trojan Horse in the culture of the School. Madrid: Ed. Morata.
- Lagarde, M. (1990). The captivities of women: Wives-mothers, nuns, whores, jail prisoners and insane. Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de Mexico.
- Lamas, M. (2002). Uses, difficulties and possibilities of the gender category. In Body: sexual difference and gender. Mexico: Edit. Taurus.
- Lee, J. (2000). Values education in the two year colleges. Los Angeles, CA: Eric Clearinghouse for Community Colleges. http://www.gseis.ucla.edu./ERIC/erci.html.