Primary and Lower Secondary School Teachers: Teachers’ Attitudes and Perceptions about Traditional Teaching Methodologies and Modern Teaching Methodologies according to RWCT
- 1 University of Tirana, Tirana, Albania
Abstract
Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking (RWCT) is a modern teaching philosophy which is based on the philosophy of constructivism, according to which the students actively participate in building up knowledge through involvement in research activities ( Kosova Education Center, 2011 ). Aim of the investigation: The aim of the study was to investigate the differences between attitudes and perceptions of the teachers of primary and lower secondary schools in regard to a traditional and modern teaching methodology such as RWCT. Method: This is a quantitative and a qualitative study. Questionnaires were utilized for the quantitative data collection, whereas a focus group discussion was conducted for qualitative data collection. The study was implemented in a sample of 473 9th grade school teachers in Kosovo. The sample was selected using a random sample selection with inclusion of urban and rural areas proportionally. Results: The data suggest there is a significant difference in attitudes and perception of primary and lower secondary school teachers, in all three measured scales: attitudes about traditional methodologies (t = 2.358, p = .019); attitudes about modern methodologies as RWCT (t = 3.077, p = .002) as well as teachers’ perception about the teaching process (t = 2.981, p = .003). Differences in primary and lower secondary school teachers’ attitudes and perception were also reflected in the qualitative data findings. Conclusion: Based on the quantitative and qualitative data, it can be noted that there is a significant difference in primary and lower secondary school teachers’ attitudes and perceptions towards teaching methodologies.
- American Institute for Research (2001). The 2000-2001 Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking Project Impact and Institutionalization Study. New York: OSI.
- Barnyak, N. C., & Paquette, K. (2010). An Investigation of Elementary Preservice Teachers Reading Instruction Beliefs. Reading Improvement. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group.
- Covac, M., & Cretu, N. (2010). Critical Thinking Program Review. OSI.
- Crawford, A., Saul, W., Mathews, S., & Makinster, J. (2005). Teaching and Learning Strategies for the Thinking Classrooms. The International Debate Education Association.
- Educational Broadcasting Corporation (2004). Constructivism as a Paradigm for Teaching and Learning (30th ed.). Online.
- Kennedy, M., Fisher, M. B., & Ennis, R. H. (1991). Critical Thinking: Literature Review and Needed Research. In L. Idol, & B. P. Jones (Eds.). Educational Values and Cognitive Instruction: Implications for Reform, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Kosova Education Center (2011). Working Report 2010. Prishtinë.
- Kosovo Pedagogical Institute (2008). The Impact of Teaching Training in Education Process. Prishtinë.
- Krueger, R. A. (1998). Moderating Focus Groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- Lau, J., & Chan, J. (2004-2014). What Is Critical Thinking?
- Leach, J., & Moon, B. (1999). Learners and Pedagogy. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
- Munby, H. (1982). The Place of Teachers’ Beliefs in Research on Teacher Thinking and Decision Making, and an Alternative Methodology. The Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, 11-13 February 1982, 201-205.
- Pupovci, D., & Taylor, A. (2003). Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking. Final Evaluation Report. Prishtinë: Kosova Education Centre.
- Rado, P. (2013). The Evaluation of the Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking Program in Kosovo. Final Evaluation Report. Prishtinë: Kosova Education Center.
- Richards, J. C. (2008). Communicative Language Teaching Today. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense-Making in Mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 334-370). New York: MacMillan.