Social Capital and Student Achievement: Exploring the Influence of Social Relationships on School Success in Norway and Romania — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Social Capital and Student Achievement: Exploring the Influence of Social Relationships on School Success in Norway and Romania
NOVA—Norwegian Social Research, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway
,
Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
,
Centre for Research and Studies in Sociology, University Institute of Lisbon, Avenida das Forças Armadas, ISCTE, Lisbon, Portugal
1 NOVA—Norwegian Social Research, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway
2 Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3 Centre for Research and Studies in Sociology, University Institute of Lisbon, Avenida das Forças Armadas, ISCTE, Lisbon, Portugal
This paper investigates student social relationships in secondary schools and its relationship with student achievement in Norway and Romania. Using data from national youth surveys (“Young in Norway 2010” for Norway and “School Success Profile Survey 2010” for Romania), we explore the concept and measurement of social capital in the school context by applying factor analysis. The paper also tests an analytical model that links student home background, student social capital and student academic achievement, using a structural equation modelling technique (LISREL). Control variables in the analysis are student gender and ethnicity. Testing the analytical model with the two datasets respectively, the results show that student social capital, generated from student social relations with parents, teachers and peers, has a significant influence on student achievement in both countries. Analysis also confirms differences between the two countries in respect to the effect of home background variables and social capital on achievement.
Agabrian, M. (2007). Relationships between School and Family: The Adolescents' Perspective. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8, Art. 20. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0701208 .
Astone, N. M., Constance, A. N., Schoen, R., and Kim, Y. J. (1999). Family Demography, Social Theory, and Investment in Social Capital. Population and Development Review, 25, 1-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.1999.00001.x
Bourdieu, P. (1997). The Forms of Capital. In A.H. Halsey (Ed.), Education: Culture, Economy and Society (pp. 241-258). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bowen, G. L., & Richman, J. M. (2001). School Success Profile. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina, School of Social Work, Jordan Institute for Families.
Bowen, G. L., Rose, R. A., & Bowen, N. K. (2005). The Reliability and Validity of the School Success Profile. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris Press.
Buru-Bellat, M. (2004). Social Inequality at School and Educational Policy. Fundamentals of Educational Planning. Paris: IIEP, UNESCO.
Cabrera, A. F., & La Nasa, S. M. (2001). On the Path to College: Three Critical Tasks Facing America’s Disadvantaged. Research in Higher Education, 42, 119-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026520002362
Cairns, D. (2014). Youth Transitions, International Student Mobility and Spatial Reflexivity: Being Mobile? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137388513
Cairns, D., Growiec, K., & Smyth, J. (2013). Leaving Northern Ireland: The Youth Mobility Field, Habitus and Recession among Undergraduates in Belfast. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34, 544-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2012.723869
Choy, S. P., Horn, L. J., Nuñez, A., & Chen, X. (2000). Transition to College: What Helps At-Risk Students and Students Whose Parents Did Not Attend College? In A. F. Cabrera & S. M. La Nasa (Eds.), Understanding the College Choice of Disadvantaged Students (pp. 241-258). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 94-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228943
Dâmean, D., Roth, M., & Hârâgus, T. P. (2010). Social Dimensions of School Success in Romania: A Comparison with USA Data. The International Journal of Learning, 17, 367-380.
Desjardins, R. (2003). Determinants of Economic and Social Outcomes from a Life-Wide Learning Perspective in Canada. Education Economics, 11, 11-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09645290210127462
Erikson, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (1998). Social Origin as an Interest-Bearing Asset: Family Background and Labour-Market Rewards among Employees in Sweden. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University.
Field, J. (2003). Social Capital. London: Routledge.
Güzel, C. I., & Berberoglu, G. (2005). An Analysis of the Programme for International Student Assessment 2000 (PISA 2000) Mathematical Literacy Data for Brazilian, Japanese and Norwegian Students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 283-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.11.006
Harding, D. J. (2003). Counterfactual Models of Neighborhood Effects: The Effects of Neighborhood Poverty on Dropping out and Teenage Pregnancy. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 368-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/379217
Hatos, A. (2008). The Impact of Segregation and Differentiation on School Performance in Grades 10-12: A Multi-Level Analysis (Impactul segregârii si diferentierii asupra performantelor scolare ale elevilor din clasele 10-12: O analizâ multinivel). Quality of Life / Calitatea Vieti, 19, 141-158.
Hill, P. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1996). Multilevel Modeling in School Effectiveness Research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 1-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0924345960070101
Hill, P. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1998). Modeling Educational Effectiveness in Classrooms: The Use of Multilevel Structural Equations to Model Students’ Progress. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4, 307-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/edre.4.4.307.6953
Hoyle, R. H., & Pantere, A. T. (1995). Writing about Structural Equations Models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modelling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. London: Sage Publications.
Hu, S. P. (2003). Educational Aspirations and Postsecondary Access and Choices: Students in Urban, Suburban, and Rural Schools Compared. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11, 1-13. http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/242
Huang, H., & Sebastian, J. (2014). The Role of Schools in Bridging Within-School Achievement Gaps Based on Socioeconomic Status: A Cross-National Comparative Study. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45, 501-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2014.905103
Huang, L. (2008). How Different Are They? Students Receiving Learning Assistance in the Classroom in Norwegian Secondary Schools. In D. M. McInercey, & A. D. Liem (Eds.), Teaching and Learning: International Best Practice. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
Huang, L. (2009a). Gender Segregation in Student Career Aspirations in Norwegian Secondary Schools. In D. P. Baker, & A. W. Wiseman (Eds.), Gender, Equality and Education from International and Comparative Perspectives. International Perspectives on Education and Society (Vol. 10, pp. 333-357). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3679(2009)0000010013
Huang, L. (2009b). Social Capital and Student Achievement in Norwegian Secondary Schools. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 320-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.004
Huang, L. (2010). Peer Relations and Student Achievement in the Norwegian Secondary Schools. The International Journal of Learning, 16, 295-306.
Husén, T. (1989). Higher Education and Social Stratification: An International Comparative Study. Paris: IIEP, UNESCO.
Jigâu, M. (Ed.) (2002). Rural Education in Romania: Conditions, Problems and Strategies for Development (Învâtâmantul rural din Romania. Conditii, probleme si strategii de dezvoltare). Bucuresti: MarLink.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Users’ Reference Guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.
Krange, O., & Bakken, A. (1998). School Achievement of the Immigrant Youth: Traditional Class Difference or New Dividing Line? (Innvandrerungdoms skoleprestasjoner. Tradisjonelle klasseskiller eller nye skillelinjer?) Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, 39, 381-410.
Lauglo, J. (1996). Uphill, but with More Drive? Immigrant Youth in Norwegian Schools (Motbakke, men mer driv? Innvandrerungdom i norsk skole). Rapport 6/98, Oslo: NOVA.
Lauglo, J. (2008). Family Structures and School Achievements (Familiestruktur og skoleprestasjoner). Tidsskrift for ungdomsforskning, 8, 3-29.
Lie, S., Kjærnsli, M., Roe, A., & Turmo, A. (2001). Good Results for the Future? Norwegian 15 Years Olds’ Competence in Reading and Science in an International Perspective (Godt rustet for framtida? Norske 15-åringers kompetanse i lesing og realfag i et internasjonalt perspektiv). Rapport 4/2001, Oslo: Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling, University of Oslo.
Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815447
Markussen, E., Strømstad, M., Carlsten, T. C., Hausstätter, R., & Nordahl, T. (2007). Inclusive Special Education? On Challenges within the Special Education in 2007 (Inkluderende spesialundervisning? Om utfordringer innefor spesialundervisningen i 2007). Rapport, 19, Oslo: NIFU-STEP.
McDaniel, A. (2010). Cross-National Gender Gaps in Educational Expectations: The Influence of National-Level Gender Ideology and Educational Systems. Comparative Education Review, 54, 27-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/648060
McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing Colleges: How Social Class and Schools Structure Opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Meier, A. (1999). Social Capital and Academic Achievement among Adolescents. Working Paper 99-18, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Centre for Demography and Ecology.
Miclea, M. (2005). Report on the Current Situation of the Education System (Raport asupra stârii sistemului de învâtâmant). Bucuresti. http://www.edu.ro/index.php/genericdocs/3590
Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic Principles of Structural Equation Modelling: An Introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3974-1
OECD, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2005). Education at a Glance 2005. Paris: OECD.
Olsen, R. V. (2003). Student and Teacher Behavior. In S. Lie, P. Linnakylä, & A. Roe (Eds.), Northern Lights on PISA: Unity and Diversity in the Nordic Countries in PISA 2000 (pp. 113-122). Oslo: University of Oslo.
Portes, A. (1998). Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
Ransdell, S. (2001). Chapter 4: Discussion and Implications. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 391-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(01)00035-0
Ransdell, S., Hawkins, C., & Adams, R. (2001). Chapter 2: Models, Modelling, and the Design of the Study. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 365-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(01)00033-7
Rowe, K. J. (1997). Factors Affecting Students’ Progress in Reading: Key Findings from a Longitudinal Study. In S. L. Swartz, & A. F. Klein (Eds.), Research in Reading Recovery (pp. 57-110). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Sandefur, G. D., & Wells, T. (1999). Does Family Structure Really Affect Educational Attainment. Social Science Research, 28, 331-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1999.0648
Sandefur, G. D., Meier, A., & Campbell, M. (2006) Family Resources, Social Capital and College Attendance. Social Science Research, 35, 525-553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.11.003
Sandefur, R. L., & Laumann, E. O. (1998). A Paradigm for Social Capital. Rationality and Society, 10, 481-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104346398010004005
Schoen, R., Kim, Y. J., Nathoanson, C. A., Fields, J., & Astone, N. M. (1997). Why Do Americans Want Children? Population and Development Review, 23, 333-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2137548
Silova, I., & Magno, C. (2004). Gender Equity Unmasked: Democracy, Gender, and Education in Central/South-Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Comparative Education Review, 48, 417-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/423358
Stanton-Salazar, R. D., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1995). Social Capital and the Reproduction of Inequality: Information Networks among Mexican-Origin High School Students. Sociology of Education, 68, 116-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2112778
Teachman, J., Paasch, K., & Carver, K. (1996). Social Capital and Dropping out of School Early. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 773-783. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353735
Tufis, P. A. (2008). Predictors of School Success in Romania: Family Background, School Factors, and Community Factors. Quality of Life / Calitatea Vietii, 19, 389-405.
Tuijnman, A. C., & Keeves, J. P. (1997). Path Analysis and Linear Structural Relations Analysis. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational Research Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook (2nd ed., pp. 621-633). Oxford: Pergamon Press and Elsevier Science.
UNESCO, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2012). World Atlas of Gender Equality in Education. Paris: UNESCO.
World Bank (2012). World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development. Washington DC: The World Bank.