Variables Affecting the Creativity of Undergraduate Students at Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University
- 1 Department of Educational Administration, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
- 2 DIEd Student in Curriculum Research and Development, Faculty of Industrial Education, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology, Ladkrabang, Thailand
- 3 DIEd Student in Curriculum Research and Development, Faculty of Industrial Education, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology, Ladkrabang, Thailand
Abstract
This descriptive research aims to investigate the construct validity of selected variables affecting the creativity of undergraduate students at Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University. Seven hundred and sixty students participated in this study. They were tested on items relating to their creativity. The results showed that executive administration, teaching, instructional attitudes, motivation, and personality variables affected the creativity of the undergraduates. Creativity consisted of originality, fluency, flexibility, and elaboration. All factor loadings were over 0.30. After confirmatory factor analysis on creativity, the results showed an acceptable goodness-of-fit (x 2 = 0.51, df = 1, p-value = 0.47497, RMSEA = 0.000). This shows that creativity measured by the creativity test is in accordance with the empirical data. Executive administration consists of policy, mission, and identity. Teaching consists of objectives, content, activity, and evaluation components. Instructional climate consisted of support, acceptance and participation. Motivation consists of needs, drives, and satisfaction. Personality consists of freedom, trust, and self-esteem. The results of the CFA indicated that each construct was well represented by the items used for the measurements.
- Amabile, T. (1996).Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Anderson, G. (1996). Learning Contracts: A Practical Guide. London: Kogan Page.
- Boden, M. A. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (2nd ed.). New Fetter, London: Routledge.
- Boonwan, D. (2009). Variables Influencing Creativity of Grade 6 Students under the Jurisdiction of Suphan Buri Educational Service Area Office. M.Ed. Thesis, Kanchanaburi: KanchanaburiRajabhat University.
- Dalton, D. R. (1988). Antecedents of Grievance Filing Behavior: Attitude/Behavioral Consistency and the Union Steward. The Academy of Management Journal, 25, 158-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256031
- Feist, G. J. (1999).The Influence of Personality on Artistic and Scientific Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). Handbook of Creativity. London: Cambridge University Press.
- Gardner, H. (2007). Five Minds for the Future. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review.
- Guilford, J. P. (1991). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
- Kosum, S. et al. (2006). Teaching Children to Think. Bangkok: Vichakarn Press.
- Lubart, T. I. (1999). The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity. London: Cambridge University Press.
- Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, Situation, and Creativity. New York: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_13
- Moonkam, S. (2007). Fully Equipped to Think. Bangkok: Partnership Prints.
- Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Societal and School Influences on Student Creativity: The Case of China. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 103-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.10072
- Office of the Education Council (2013). Thailand Education State for Population Report. Bangkok: Pim Dee Publishing House.
- Paksanchai, M. (2008). The Development of the Cause and Effect Model of Creativity of Junior High School Students of the Archdiocese, Bangkok. M.Ed. Thesis, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
- Panjamawat, T. (2005). Causal Model of the Variables That Influence Student Creativity. M.Ed. Thesis, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
- Panmanee, A. (2007). Psychological Creative Teaching. Bangkok: Yaimai Educated Press.