Teaching to the Test: Approaches to Teaching in Senior Secondary Schools in the Context of Curriculum Reform in China
- 1 School of Education, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China
- 2 School of Education, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China
- 3 Department of Sociology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China
Abstract
It has been proved in the past half century that high-stakes tests hinder more than promote instruction. The College Entrance Examination (CEE) in China has thus been in widely questioned. When it comes to curriculum reform this century, the question becomes how has curriculum reform been implemented in the classroom? What role does the CEE play in it? A qualitative study of three high schools of different levels in a city of central China shows that transmission classes emphasizing teachers’ cramming and students’ passive memorizing are predominant in classrooms, with about one-third of comprehensive classes based on constructivism. Transformative classes calling for students’ positive inquisition and comprehensive development are still highly unusual. The CEE is a “ferocious” controller of teaching and learning. Though instruction is, in some way, promoted by CEE reform, it still has a long way to go to break itself out from a test-oriented predicament. It is, then, necessary to launch a structural reform of the CEE, change the teachers’ beliefs and develop their competence in curriculum implementation.
- Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does Washback Exist? Applied Linguistics, 14, 115-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.2.115
- Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (2008). Globalization and Curriculum. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction (pp. 349-368). California: Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412976572.n17
- Au, W. (2007). High-Stakes Testing and Curriculum Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523
- Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the New Taylorism: High-Stakes Testing and the Standardization of the 21st Century Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43, 25-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.521261
- Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinumann.
- Chapman, D. W., & Snyder, C. W. (2000). Can High Stakes National Testing Improve Instruction: Reexamining Conventional Wisdom. International Journal of Educational Development, 20, 457-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(00)00020-1
- Cheung, D., & Wong, H. W. (2002). Measuring Teacher Beliefs about Alternative Curriculum Designs. The Curriculum Journal, 13, 225-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585170210136868
- Dewey (1966). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Free Press.
- Fenstermacher, G. D., & Soltis, J. E. (2009). Approaches to Teaching (5th ed.). New York and London: Teachers College Press.
- Fullan, M. (1998). The Meaning of Educational Change: A Quarter of a Century of Learning. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. W. Hopkins (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Change (pp. 214-228). New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4944-0_12
- Fullan, M. (2001). The New Meaning of Educational Change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College.
- Gardner, H., & Boix-Mansilla, V. (1994). Teaching for Understanding in the Disciplines and Beyond. Teachers College Record, 96, 198-218.
- Hannum, E., An, X. H., & Cherng, H. Y. (2011). Examinations and Educational Opportunity in China: Mobility and Bottlenecks for the Rural Poor. Oxford Review of Education, 37, 267-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.559387