The Importance of Piagetian Reference for the Elucidation of Conceptual Development in Chemistry
- 1 Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Blumenau, Brazil
- 2 Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Blumenau, Brazil
- 3 Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Blumenau, Brazil
Abstract
Genetic epistemological studies underlie the development of methodological proposals for education. In order to reach an inference about the cognitive structure of children and adolescents, experiments based on the Piagetian clinical method are performed with infralogical operations. In achieving these inferences, it is suggested to carry out chemistry experiments seeking representation of children and adolescents with respect to the actions and reactions of said experiments. In this study, we present for the first time in the literature correlations between the Piagetian clinical method and classic experiments performed in chemistry labs. Thus seeking the contributions of chemistry to explain phenomena and support the learning of children as an alternative to the education and consequentially development of children.
- Abreu, L. C. A. et al. (2010). The Genetic Epistemology of Piaget and Constructivism. Journal of Human Growth and Development, 20, 361-366.
- Andersson, B. (1990). Pupils’ Conceptions of Matter and Its Transformations (Age 12-16). Studies in Science Education, 18, 53-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057269008559981
- Antunes, M. T. (2013). Be Protagonist (2nd Edition) Sao Paulo.
- Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., & Silverstein, J. (1986). Is an Atom of Copper Malleable? Journal of Chemical Education, 63, 64- 66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed063p64
- Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A Theory of Knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63, 873-877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed063p873
- Bou Jaoude, S. B. (1991). A Study of the Nature of Students’ Understanding about the Concept of Burning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 689-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280806
- Carmichael, P., Driver, R., Holding, B., Phillips, I., Twigger, D., & Watts, M. (1990). Research on Students’ Conceptions in Science—A Bibliography. Leeds: University of Leeds.
- Castro, E., Silva, G., Mol, G., Matsunaga, R., Farias, S., Santos, S., DIB, S., & Santos, W. (2010). Chemistry for the New Generation—Citizen Chemistry (1st Edition), Sao Paulo: New Generation.
- Chassot, A. I. (2014) For What/Who Is Useful Teaching? (3rd Edition). Ijuí: UNIJUí.
- Coutinho, M. T. C., & Moreira, M. (2001) Educational Psychology. Lê: Belo Horizonte.
- Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978) Pupils and Paradigms: A Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
- Driver, R., & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories-in-Action: Some Theoretical and Empirical Issues in the Study of Students’ Conceptual Frameworks in Science. Studies in Science Education, 10, 37-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057267808559857
- Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R. and Scott, P. (1996) Young People’s Images of Science. Buckingham: Open University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057268308559904
- Fonseca, M. R. M. (2010). Chemistry: Environment, Citizenship, Technology. Sao Paulo: FTD.
- Herron, J.D. (1978). Piaget in the Classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 55, 165-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed055p165