Introduction: The Script Concordance Test (SCT) is an assessment method of clinical reasoning skills. SCT is designed to assess a candidate’s ability to reason when faced with decisions encountered in the three phases of clinical decision-making: diagnosis, investigation and treatment. Challenges have been raised related to psychometric properties of SCT scores. Data about accept- ability of the SCT method are also needed. Objectives: 1) To examine the validity of a Pediatric Script Concordance Test (PSCT) in discriminating clinical reasoning ability between junior postgraduate year (PGY) 1 - 2 and senior PGY 3 - 4 pediatric residents, and pediatricians, 2) To determine if higher reliability could be achieved by applying specific test design strategies to the PSCT and 3) To explore trainees’/physicians’ acceptability of the PSCT. Methods: A 24-case/137 question PSCT was administered to 91 residents from four Canadian training centers. Each resident’s PSCT was scored based on the aggregate responses of 21 pediatricians (Panel of Experts (POE)). ANOVA was used to compare across the 3 levels of experience. Reliability was calculated using Cronbach’s α coefficient. Participants completed a post-test survey about the acceptability of PSCT. Results: Overall, a statistical difference in performance was noted across all levels of experience, F = 22.84 (df = 2); p < 0.001. The POE had higher scores than both senior (mean difference = 9.15; p < 0.001) and junior residents (mean difference = 14.90; p < 0.001). The seniors performed better than juniors (mean difference = 5.76; p < 0.002). Reliability of PSCT scores (Cronbach’s α ) was 0.85. Participants expressed keen interest and engagement in the PSCT. Conclusions: PSCT is a valid, reliable, feasible and acceptable method to assess the core competency of clinical reasoning. We suggest the PSCT may be effectively integrated into formative residency assessment and with increasing exposure, experience and refinement may soon be ready to pilot within summative assessments in pediatric medical education.
KeywordsClinical ReasoningScript Concordance TestPost-Graduate Medical EducationAssessment
American Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AAC-GME) (2011). ACGME Outcome Project: Enhancing Residency Education through Outcomes Assessment. http://www.acgme.org/Outcome
Bland, A. C., Kreiter, C. D., & Gordon, J. A. (2005). The Psychometric Properties of Five Scoring Methods Applied to the Script Concordance Test. Academic Medicine, 80, 395-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200504000-00019
Bowen, J. L. (2006). Educational Strategies to Promote Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning. New England Journal of Medicine, 355, 2217-2225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054782
Brailovsky, C., Charlin, B., Beausoleil, S., Cote, S., & van der Vleuten, C. (2001). Measurement of Clinical Reflective Capacity Early in Training as a Predictor of Clinical Reasoning Performance at the End of Residency: An Experimental Study on the Script Concordance Test. Medical Education, 35, 430-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00911.x
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brazeau-Lamontagne, L., Charlin, B., Gagnon, R., Samson, L., & van der Vleuten, C. (2004). Measurement of Perception and Interpretation Skills during Radiology Training: Utility of the Script Concordance Approach. Medical Teacher, 26, 326-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590410001679000
Carrière, B., Gagnon, R., Charlin, B., Downing, S., & Bordage, G. (2009). Assessing Clinical Reasoning in Paediatric Emergency Medicine: Validity Evidence for a Script Concordance Test. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 53, 647-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.024
Charlin, B., Brailovsky, C. A., Brazeau-Lamontagne, L., Samson, L., & Leduc, C., (1998). Script Questionnaires: Their Use for Assessment of Diagnostic Knowledge in Radiology. Medical Teacher, 20, 567-571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421599880300
Charlin, B., Brailovsky, C. A., Leduc, C., & Blouin, D. (1998). The Diagnostic Script Questionnaire: A New Tool to Assess a Specific Dimension of Clinical Competence. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 3, 51-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009741430850
Charlin, B., Roy, L., Brailovsky, C., Goulet, F., & van der Vleuten, C. (2000). The Script Concordance Test: A Tool to Assess the Reflective Clinician. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 12, 189-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328015TLM1204_5
Charlin, B., Gagnon, R., Pelletier, J., Coletti, M., Abi-Rizk, G., Nasr, C., Sauve, E., & van der Vleuten, C. (2006). Assessment of Clinical Reasoning in the Context of Uncertainty: The Effect of Variability in the Reference Panel. Medical Education, 40, 848-854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02541.x
Charlin, B., Boshuizen, H. P., Custers, E. J., & Feltovich, P. J. (2007). Scripts and Clinical Reasoning. Medical Education, 41, 1178-1184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02924.x
Charlin, B., Gagnon, R., Lubarsky, S., Lambert, C., et al. (2010). Assessment in the Context of Uncertainty Using the Script Concordance Test: More Meaning for More Scores. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 22, 180-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2010.488197
Charlin, B., Lubarksy, S., & Kazatani, D. (2015). Script Concordance Test Web-Site. Center for Pedagogical Applications of Science and Health. Montreal: Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal. http://www.cpass.umontreal.ca
Elstein, A. S., Shulman, L. S., & Sprafka, S. A. (1990). Medical Problem Solving, a Ten-Year Retrospective. Evaluation and the Health Profession, 13, 5-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016327879001300102
Fournier, J. P., Demeester, A., & Charlin, B. (2008). Script Concordance Tests: Guidelines for Construction. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision-Making, 8, 18. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/8/18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-8-18
Goulet, F., Jacques, A., Gagnon, R., Charlin, B., & Shabah, A. (2010). Poorly Performing Physicians. Does the Script Concordance Test Detect Bad Clinical Reasoning? Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 30, 161-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chp.20076
Kow, N., Walters, M. D., Karram, M. M., Sarsotti, C. J., & Jelovsek, E. J. (2014). Assessing Intraoperative Judgment Using Script Concordance Testing through the Gynecology Continuum of Practice. Medical Teacher, 36, 724-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.910297
Lambert, C., Gagnon, R., Nguyen, D., & Charlin, B. (2009). The Script Concordance Test in Radiation Oncology: Validation Study of a New Tool to Assess Clinical Reasoning. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 4, 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717x-4-7
Lemay, J.-F, Donnon, T., & Charlin, B. (2010). The Reliability and Validity of a Paediatric Script Concordance Test with Medical Students, Paediatric Residents and Experienced Paediatricians. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 1, e89-e95.
Lineberry, M., Kreiter, C. D., & Bordage, G. (2013). Threats to the Validity in the Use and Interpretation of Script Concordance Test Scores. Medical Education, 47, 1175-1183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.12283
Lubarsky, S., Chalk, C., Kazitani, D., Gagnon, R., & Charlin, B. (2009). The Script Concordance Test: A New Tool Assessing Clinical Judgment in Neurology. Canadian Journal of Neurological Science, 36, 326-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S031716710000706X
Lubarsky, S., Dory, V., Duggan, P., Gagnon, R., & Charlin, B. (2013). Script Concordance Testing: From Theory to Practice. AMEE Guide No. 75. Medical Teacher, 35, 184-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.760036
Park, A. J., Barber, M. D., Bent, A. E., et al. (2010). Assessment of Intra-Operative Judgment during Gynecologic Surgery Using the Script Concordance Test. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 203, 240.e1-240.e6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.010
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) (2005). CanMEDS 2005 Framework, p. 2; c2005. http://www.ub.edu/medicina_unitateducaciomedica/documentos/CanMeds.pdf
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) (2008). Objectives of Training in Pediatrics. http://www.royalcollege.ca/cs/groups/public/documents/document/y2vk/mdaw /~edisp/tztest3rcpsced000931.pdf
Ruiz, J. G., Tunuguntla, R., Charlin, B., Ouslander, J. G., Symes, S. N., Gagnon, R., Phancao, F., & Roos, B. A. (2010). The Script Concordance Test as a Measure of Clinical Reasoning Skills in Geriatric Urinary Incontinence. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 58, 2178-2184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03136.x
See, K. C., Keng, L. T., & Lim, T. K. (2014). The Script Concordance Test for Clinical Reasoning: Re-Examining Its Utility and Potential Weakness. Medical Education, 48, 1069-1077. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.12514
Sibert, L., Charlin, B., Corcos, J., Gagnon, R., Grise, P., & van der Vleuten, C. (2002). Stability of Clinical Reasoning Assessment Results with the Script Concordance Test across Two Different Linguistic, Cultural and Learning Environments. Medical Teacher, 24, 522-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159021000012599
Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (1996). The Assessment of Professional Competence: Development, Research and Practical Implications. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 1, 41-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00596229