The present article investigates the perspective of children about the institutional context, considering the physical and social aspects of the environment, taking part of the research six children from a shelter in the metropolitan region of Belém/Pará/Brazil. For the data collection were used semi structured interviews and children’s stories. The interviews were fully transcribed for content analysis from which were extracted the following categories: social aspects of the environment: interactions and activities established in the institution; and physical aspects of the environment: variety and availability of objects. To what concerns the social aspects, the main results show that the children were free to play in different areas of the institution, enabling interactions among siblings. Moreover, the activities performed outside the institutional environment, such as tours, were much appreciated by the children. Regarding the physical aspects, the institution had a great variety of objects, as toys, to which the children had access. Even though some of the objects were shared among the children, such as clothes and toys, some of the strategies of the staff were to value the individuality and subjectivity of the children. Therefore, it was possible to debate through the children’s perspective some important aspects related to the physical and social context of the residential care.
Almeida, I. G., Maehara, N. P., & Rossetti-Ferreira, M. A. (2011). Reflections on Human Development and Institutional Context. In M. A. Rossetti-Ferreira, S. A. Serrano, & I. G. Almeida (Eds.), The Institutionalcare in the Child’s Perspective (pp. 119-172). Sao Paulo: Hucitec.
Alves, H. C., & Emmel, M. L. G. (2008). Ecological Approach and Oral Narratives: A Study of Childvictims. Paidéia, 18, 85-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2008000100009
Amaral, D. C., Magalhaes, C. M. C., & Corrêa, L. S. (2015). Perceptions of Children in Institutional Sheltering: Interpersonal Relationships and Roles Played. Psychology, 6, 954-964. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2015.68094
Bardin, L. (2011). Contentanalysis. Sao Paulo: Edicoes.
Batista, C. V. M. (2012). The Place of Play in the Educational Practices with Babies. In E. Bomtempo, & L. C. Going (Eds.), Happy and Playful: A Reflection on the Playful Education (pp. 65-80). Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Wak.
Bernardi, D. C. F. (2010a). Shelters for Whom? In D. F. C. Bernardi (Eds.), Each Case Is Different—The Voice of Children and Adolescents in Residential Care (pp. 49-58). Sao Paulo: Shelters Collection Moving.
Bernardi, D. C. F. (2010b). Families in Vulnerable Situations. In D. F. C. Bernardi (Eds.), Each Case Is Different—The Voice of Children and Adolescents in Residential Care (pp. 37-43). Sao Paulo: Shelters Collection Moving.
Brazil, Child and Adolescent Statute—ECA (1990). Official Diary of the Union. Law No. 8.069, 16 July1990. Brasília: Federal Senate.
Brazil, NationalCouncil for the Rights of Children and Adolescents and the National Social Assistance Council (2009). According to the Technical Orientations for the Sheltering Services for Children and Adolescents. Brasília: Conanda.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1996). The Ecology of Human Development: Natural Experiments and Planned. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2011). The Bio-Ecology of Humandevelopment: Making the Mosthumanhumanbeings. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.
Cavalcante, L. I. C., Costa, L. N., & Magalhaes, C. M. C. (2012). Caretaking Behavior among Siblings in Children’s Shelters. Psychology: Reflection and Criticism, 25, 165-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-79722012000100020
Christensen, P., & Prout, A. (2002). Working with Ethical Symmetry in Social Research with Children. Childhood, 9, 477-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0907568202009004007
Corrêa, L. S., & Cavalcante, L. I. C. (2013). Shelter Educators: Conceptions on Development and Care Practices in Play Situation. Journal of Human Growth and Development, 23, 309-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.69506
Corrêa. L. S. (2011). Conceptions of Development and Carepractices for Children in Shelter Environment in the Developmental Niche Perspective. Unpublished Dissertation, Federal University of Pará, Belém.
Costa, L. N., Magalhaes, C. M. C., & Pedroso, J. S. (2014). Interactions between Siblings in Institutional Sheltering: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3, 155-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v3n4a14
Elage, B. (2010). Last Invaded This. In B. Elage (Ed.), Life Stories: Identity and Protection. The Story of Martin and Hisbrothers (pp. 73-85). Sao Paulo: Shelters Collection Moving.
Elbers, E. (2004). Conversational Asymmetry and the Child’s Perspective in Developmental and Education Research. International Journal Disability, Development and Education, 51, 201-215. http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/11219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10349120410001687409
Garzella, M. C. & Serrano, S. A. (2011).The Shelterunder the Lens of Children: Eyes and Voices of the Living in the Institution. In M. A. Rossetti-Ferreira, S. A. Serrano, & I. G. Almeida (Eds.), The Institutionalcare in the Child’s Perspective (pp. 199-234). Sao Paulo: Hucitec.
Groark, C. J., Mccall, R. B., & Fish, L. (2011). Characteristics of Environments, Caregivers, and Children in Three Central American Orphanages. Infant Mental Health Journal, 32, 232-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/imhj.20292
Martins, E., & Szymanski, H. (2004). House of Playing: Meaning of Family for Institutionalized Children. Psychologystudies, 9, 177-187.
Minayo, M. C. S. (2010). The Challenge of Knowledge: Qualitative Health Research. Sao Paulo: Hucitec/Abrasco.
Platilha, R. da C., Magalhaes, C. M. C., & Pedroso, J. da S. (2014). Children’s Oral Productions on Institutional Care. Perspectives of Development: A Multidimensional Approach, 2, 1-18. http://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/perspectivasdodesenvolvimento/article/view/11620/9080
Pontes, F. A. R., & Izar, P. (2005). The Study of Social Relations in the Ethological Perspective. In F. A. R. Pontes, C. M. C. Magalhaes, R. C. S. Brito, & W. L. B. Martin (Eds.), Topicsrelevant to the Construction of Contemporary Psychology (pp. 65-96). Belém: University Press-UFPA.
Prada, C. G., Williams, L. C. A., & Weber, L. N. D. (2007). Shelters for Child Victims of Domestic Violence: Functioning Reported by Children and Managers. Psychology: Theory and Practice, 9, 14-25. http://www.nac.ufpr.br/artigos_do_site/2007_Abrigos_para_criancas_vitimas_de_violencia_domestica.pdf
Rossetti-Ferreira, M. A., Serrano, S. A., & Costa do Amaral, N. R. (2011). Reflections on Human Development and Institutional Context. In M. A. Rossetti-Ferreira, S. A. Serrano, & I. G. Almeida (Eds.), The Institutional Care in the Child’s Perspective (pp. 60-85). Sao Paulo: Hucitec.
Silva, F. L., & Magalhaes, L. A. (2011). “Watch Robocop There Is Boring!” Talking to Children about Their Experiences in Institutional Shelter. In M. A. Rossetti-Ferreira, S. A. Serrano, & I. G. Almeida (Eds.), The Institutional Care in the Child’s Perspective (pp. 235-272). Sao Paulo: Hucitec.
Siqueira, A. C., & Dell’Aglio, D. D. (2006). The Impact of Institutionalization on Children and Adolescents: A Literature Review. Psychology & Society, 18, 71-80.
Souza, S. J., & Castro, L. R. (2008). Searching with Children: Child Subjectivity, Dialogism and Gender Discourse. In S. H. V. Cruz (Eds.), The Child Speaks—Listening to Children in Research (pp. 52-78). Sao Paulo: Cortez.
Thorne, B. (2002). From Silence to Voice: Bringing Children More Fully into Knowledge. Childhood, 9, 251-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0907568202009003604
Trivellato, A. J., Carvalho, C., & Vectore, C. (2013). Affective Listening: Possibilities of Use in Childcare Settings. Biannual Magazine of the Association of School and EducationalPsychology, 17, 299-307.
Vidigal, C. (2010). Shelter-Host Community and Socioeducation. In M. V. Baptista (Ed.), Shelter: Host Community and Socioeducation (pp. 84-85). Sao Paulo: Camargo Institute.